Jeff Morley wrote: "...We can likewise treat with skepticism the CIA's latest interpretation of Kennedy's murder, proposed by Brian Latell, a former
John McAdams asks: "Where did Morley get the CIA
"put out the Castro did it" theory?"
I have been writing about this subject for years. Here's a few of the articles:
Black Propaganda & the JFK Assassination
THE PROOF IN THE PROPAGANDA – Black Prop Ops and the
Assassination of JFK
Actually there were two conspiracies associated with the assassination of
President Kennedy – the first was the arrangement of his murder, the second
concerns the cover-up and thwarting of justice. The second conspiracy continues
today.
The evidence in both cases is in the form of fingerprints – the fingerprints of
distinct intelligence techniques at work. Evidence of the first conspiracy
comes in the form of foreknowledge, individuals who had knowledge of the
assassination before it occurred and expressed this knowledge to others. [See:
List A
Fifth century Chinese philosopher and author of the classic manual “The Art of
War” said that foreknowledge cannot be elicited by spirits or obtained by magic
but rather can only be acquired from an operational network of spies.
“Foreknowledge,” he said, “is the reason the enlightened prince and the wise
general conquer the enemy whenever they move.”
Proof of the second conspiracy stems from the fact that black propaganda
operations were utilized before the assassination, and continue to operate
today to maintain security and protect those responsible for the first
conspiracy.
That people had foreknowledge of the assassination before it occurred and black
propaganda operations were conducted in concert with the murder indicates that
the assassination was carried out by trained covert intelligence operatives and
not by a lone, deranged nut case or the Mafia. This does not preclude however,
members of organized crime or crazy people from being involved in the
operation.
That Fidel Castro and Cuba
were behind the assassination is disinformation and the deception plan behind
the black propaganda operation conducted in concert with the President’s
murder. Over a dozen incidents, most if not all of which can be traced back to
the same source, attempt to portray the assassination as the work of Castro or
his G2. [See: List – Below]
Tracing the deceptive disinformation back to its source should also give us the
source of the operation that resulted in what happened at Dealey
Plaza .
Since disinformation, propaganda and psychological warfare operations utilize
explicit techniques, they can be identified, isolated and studied as to their
content, intention and source, and thus provide a window into the nest of the
responsible party.
According to Ladislas Farago such, “Black Propaganda is a fundamental
intelligence operation,…because it never identifies its real source and
pretends to originate within or close to the enemy.”
Paul Linebarger, a professor at the School for Advanced International Studies
at John Hopkins
University , also taught the black
arts of propaganda and psychological warfare operations at his Washington
D.C. home. Every Friday evening student
spys would take round-a-bout means to unobtrusively get to his house where they
learned the secret techniques of propaganda and deception.
One of his students, Joseph Burkholder Smith (“Portrait of a Cold Warrior” G.
Putnam/s Sons, N.Y., 1976), relates how Linebarger explained that Black
Propaganda is “carefully labeled to be acts of the enemy.”
Not a subject found in the curriculum of most colleges, the textbook is rare,
Linebarger’s “Psychological Warfare – International Propaganda and
Communications” (Arno Press, 1948, 1952, 1972, Duell, Sloan and Pearce, N.Y.)
is a still used by today’s psychological warriors.
According to Linebarger, “Psychological warfare, in the broad sense, consists
of the application of parts of the science called psychology to the conduct of
war; psychological warfare comprises the use of propaganda against the enemy,
together with such military operational measures as may supplement the
propaganda. Propaganda may be described in turn, as organized persuasion by
non-violent means. War itself may be considered to be, among other things, a
violent form of persuasion. War is waged against the minds, not the bodies of
the enemy.”
The term propaganda stems from the name of the department of the Vatican
which had the duty of propagating the faith.
Specifically defined, propaganda consists of the planned use of any form of
public or mass produced communication designed to affect the minds and emotions
of a given group for a specific public purpose, whether military, economic or
political. Military propaganda consists of the planned use of any form of
communications designed to affect the minds and emotions of a given enemy,
neutral or friendly foreign group for a specific strategic or tactical purpose.
Note that if the communication is not planned, it cannot be called propaganda,
and that if does not originate from an intelligence agency or service, it is
not disinformation.
Linebarger developed the STASM formula for spot analysis, in which propaganda
can be distinguished by the consideration of five elements – 1) Source, 2)
Time, 3) Audience, 4) Subject, 5) Mission .
According to Linebarger, this formula works best in the treatment of monitored
materials of which the source is known. First point to note is the character of
the source – the true source (who really got it out?), the ostensible source
(whose name is signed to it?); also the first use source (who used it the first
time?) and the second source (who claims merely to be using it as a
quotation?).
It is soon evident that the mere attribution of source is a job of high
magnitude. A systematic breakdown of the STASM formula produces the following
analysis outline: applicable to any single propaganda item, civil or military,
in war or peace, spoken, visual or printed. There are five kinds of propaganda:
Defense – maintains an accepted form of social action; Offensive – interrupts
social action not desired; Conversionary – change allegiance; Divisive – split
apart enemy compoents; Consolidation – insure compliance of occupied civilians;
Counterpropaganda – refutes.
Security is designed to deep useful information from reaching the enemy, while
propaganda operations are designed to get information to him.
According to Smith, “Linebarger’s two leading operational heroes whose
activities formed the basis for lessons he wished us to learn and whose
examples he thought we should follow were Lt. Col. Edward G. Lansdale and E.
Howard Hunt,” who had what Linebarger called “black minds.”
Besides his own textbook, Linebarger used another book in his classes, “The Big
Con” by David W. Maurer (Pocket Books, N.Y., 1949), which is the story used as
the basis for the screenplay of the movie “The Sting.” Maurer, a Kentucky
linguistics professor, began to study the unique slang of confidence men, but
developed that interest into a unique analysis of the Big Con confidence games
that proliferated during the early part of the last century.
That book, “gives ideas on how to recruit agents, how to handle them and how to
get rid of them peacefully when they’re no use to you any longer.” As
Linebarger concluded, “Believe me, that last one is the toughest job of all,”
as David A. Phillips learned with Antonio Vechina.
“The big time confidence games are in reality, only carefully rehearsed plays
in which every member of the cast EXCEPT THE MARK knows his part perfectly,”
wrote Maurer.
“Propaganda is directed to the subtle niceties of thought by which people
maintain their personal orientation in an unstable interpersonal world,” wrote
Linebarger. “Propaganda must use the language of the mother, the schoolteacher,
the lover, the bully, the policeman, the actor, the ecclesiastic, the buddy,
the newspaperman, all of them in turn. And propaganda analysis, in weighing and
evaluating propaganda, must be even more discriminating whether the propaganda
is apt to hit its mark or not.”
Black Propaganda Operations affiliated with the
Assassination of JFK:
1) A leaflet was
distributed to the Florida Cuban community in November, 1963 that warned of an
“Act of God” that would put a “Texan in the White House.”
2) Lee Harvey Oswald’s
Fair Play for Cuba Committee activities in New Orleans
in the summer of 1963.
3) Oswald’s visit to the
Cuban and Russian embassies in Mexico City
in Sept., 1963.
4) The photographs of
Oswald brandishing a rifle and pistol and copies of two leftest but
contradictory magazines in his back yard.
5) The last two issues
President Kennedy dealt with before leaving the White House for Texas
concerned his backchannel negotiations with Fidel Castro at the UN and the
discovery of a cache of weapons in Venezuela
that appeared to have come from Cuba .
The weapons story was later discovered to be over a year old and planted by the
CIA to falsely implicate Cuba .
6) Julio Fernandez, one
of three anti-Castro Cubans whose boat was financially supported by Clair Booth
Luce, called Luce, wife of the publisher of Time-Life on the evening of the
assassination to report information on Oswald’s activities in New
Orleans . Fernandez, a former Cuban publisher,
was married to an attorney who worked for Catholic Welfare Services in Miami .
7) In Miami ,
shortly after the assassination, Dr. Jose Ignorzio, the chief of clinical
psychology for the Catholic Welfare Services, contacted the White House to
inform the new administration that Oswald had met directly with Cuban
ambassador Armas in Mexico .
8) In Mexico
City , David Atlee Philips of the CIA
debriefed a Nicaraguan intelligence officer, code named “D,” who claimed to
have seen Oswald take money from a Cuban at the Cuban embassy.
9) In New
Zealand , U.S.A.F. Col. Fletcher Prouty read
complete biographies of Oswald in the local papers hours after the
assassination, indicating to him that a bio of Oswald was pre-prepared.
10) Brothers Jerry and James Buchanan, CIA
propaganda assets, began promoting the Castro-did-it theme immediately.
According to Donald Freed and Jeff Cohen (in Liberation Magazine), the source
of the Buchanan’s tales was the leader of the CIA
supported International Anti-Communist Brigade (IAB). “Back in Miami ,”
they wrote, “a high powered propaganda machine was cranking out stories that
Oswald was a Cuban agent…” Sturgis is quoted in the Pampara Beach Sun-Sentinel
as saying that Oswald had talked with Cuban G-2 agents and fracassed with IAB
members in Miami in 1962.
11) Jack Anderson used Sturgis and mobster John
Rosselli to keep the Castro plot propaganda story going well into the 1970s.
12) The same “propaganda machine” was still
pumping out the same lines in 1976 when Gaeton Fonzi interviewed Sturgis, who
said that he had recently ran into a friend who worked for the “company” who
reminded him of an incident he had completely forgotten about. Sturgis suddenly
recalled, “that he had heard about a meeting in Havana
about two months before the Kennedy assassination. At the meeting there were a
number of high-ranking men, including Castro, hs brother Raul, Ramiro Valdez,
the chief of Cuban intelligence, Che Guevara and his secretary Tanya, another
Cuban officer, an American known as ‘El Mexicano,’ and,…oh, yea; Jack Ruby. And
the meeting dealt with plotting the assassination of President Kennedy.”
13) Seith Kantor, a Scripps-Howard News
Service Reporter in Dallas during
the assassination, couldn’t understand why his telephone call records from Parkland
Hospital were being withheld
because “disclosure would reveal confidential source of information.” When
Kantor checked his own records he discovered his editor had told him to call
another reporter in Florida or
some deep background on Oswald. The reporter in Florida
had everything on Oswald, FPFCC, Russian defection, New
Orleans radio debate, etc., but instead of using it
himself, fed it to Kantor. The reporter was Hal “the Spook” Hendrix, who won
the Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Cuban Missile Crisis and earned his
nickname when he “reported” on the Dominican Republic Coup on September 24,
1963, the day before it happened. His CIA
affiliations became better known when he went to work for ITT
in Chile and
was found guilty of withholding information from a Congressional committee
concerning his role in the Chilean coup.
14) While other major news organizations
have been exposed as CIA media assets, such
as CBS News, Life Magazine, the North American Newspaper Alliance and the
Copley Newspaper chain, the Scripps-Howard News Service (SHNS) stands out not
only because of the Kantor-Hendrix connection, but because of the March 12 news
report out of Washington . An
obvious black propaganda operation that stems from NSA intercepts (note that
the NSA does not issue press releases), and continues to implicate Castro in
not only the assassination of President Kennedy, but in the planning of an
assassination on President Reagan. This story is remarkably similar to the one
that Sturgis tells [in #12] and includes many of the same conspirators. [See:
SHNS Story]. Also please note that two weeks after this obvious piece of black
propaganda disinformation was published, President Reagan was shot in front of
the Washington Hilton by John Hinkley.
Example of Black Prop Op and JFK Assassination.
Why weren’t the records of this incident released by the NSA
under the JFK Act?
Scripps-Howard News Service – By R. H. Boyce. Thursday, March 12, 1981
The NSA, which monitors published and broadcast information around the globe,
does not makes such “alert” messages available to the press. But SHNS obtained
a copy, which was marked “for official use only.” It included the text of the
newspaper report as well as a garbled message about the news story directed to
the head of Castro’s controlled news agency, Presna Latina.
Without revealing its sources, the news report, published yesterday in the Caracas ,
Venezuela ,
newspaper El Mundo, asserted the assassination plot called for the slaying to
be carried out by Illich Ramirez Sancho, an international terrorists known as
Carlos the Jackal. Carlos is said to have organized the massacre of Israeli
athletes at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich , West
Germany , and has been involved in dozens of
terrorists acts.
The Caracas newspaper story said
the assassination plan, “was discussed in a meeting of the International Trust
of Crime in Cojimar, an exclusive beach club east of Havana ,
with the participants of Montonero and Tupamaro thugs, Illich Ramirez, Ramiro
Valdez, Cuban Police Minister Carlos Rafael Rodriguez and Fidel Castro.”
No identification was found of Ramiro Valdez. Montonero “thugs” are terrorists
operating primarily in Argentina
while Tupumaros thugs operate in Uruguay .
The article said Palestine Liberation Organization chief Yasir Arafat also
participated in the plan.
Presna Latina (Latin Press) often has been used by Castro for political ends.
The Pressa Latina correspondent in Caracas ,
at 9:47 a.m. EST yesterday, began
transmitting the El Mundo article by cable to Prensa Latina headquarters in Havana .
NSA monitored it. At the close of the text, Prensa Latina Caracas began adding
what appears to be commentary on the El Mundo report. It reads:
“Everything seems to indicate that Fidel Castro is planning the assassination
of U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the same way that he previously ordered the
assassination of John F. Kennedy and whose participation the high-ranking U.S.
government circles hid…”
There the Prensa Latina cable transmission stopped. Had it been ordered broken
off by the Venezuela
government, say U.S.
officials, NSA would have added the words: “transmission interrupted,” to show Venezuela ’s
action. There was no such NSA notation. Officials provided no explanation of
why the transmission ended in mid-sentence.
Scripps-Howard News Service – By R. H. Boyce. Thursday, March 12, 1981
No comments:
Post a Comment