Friday, June 30, 2023

Pakistan Report on Biden Dismissing JFK Act

 Biden Issues Memo Concluding Review Of JFK Assassination Records - White House

https://www.pakistanpoint.com/en/story/1716994/biden-issues-memo-concluding-review-of-jfk-assassinatio.html

 Anas Khan  4 hours ago

WASHINGTON (Pakistan Point News / Sputnik - 01st July, 2023) US President Joe Biden has issued a memorandum concluding the review of declassified records related to the 1963 assassination of former President John Kennedy, White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre announced.

"As part of the Biden-Harris administration's continued commitment to government transparency and accountability, President Biden issued a memorandum today concluding the review of records from President John F. Kennedy's assassination records collection. Under President Biden's leadership, agencies have fully declassified over 16,000 records since 2021," Jean-Pierre said on Friday.

The action reflects Biden's instruction that all information related to Kennedy's assassination should be released except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise, Jean-Pierre said.

"As a result, over 99 percent of the records in the collection are now publicly available at the National Archives," Jean-Pierre said.

In keeping with Biden's direction, the National Archives will digitize the entire collection to make it more accessible to the public, she added.

Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 while riding in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas. The president was shot by US Marine Corp veteran Lee Harvey Oswald, according to the official Warren Commission report released in 1964.

The Warren Commission's report was initially sealed until 2039 before Congress passed the so-called JFK Records Act in 1992, which directed the National Archives and Records Administration to develop a collection on the assassination.

The official narrative has been the subject of intense criticism whereby a number of alternative theories to explain Kennedy's assassination have since been offered.

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Why RFK, Jr. Will Be the 2004 Democratic nominee THE HILL

 From The Hill – Washington D.C. Capitol Hill News

Why I believe RFK Jr. will be the 2024 Democratic nominee

BY DOUGLAS MACKINNON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 05/27/23 12:00 PM ET


https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4020920-why-i-believe-rfk-jr-will-be-the-2024-democratic-nominee/

If the shocking 2016 presidential election of Donald J. Trump taught us anything, it should be that voters can still be unpredictable and unpollable, and that millions of them believe that the entrenched elites from both political parties no longer hear their voices or speak for them.

Voters are continually seeking a new champion. Will Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. become such a champion? I believe so — at least as far as the Democratic primary process is concerned.

When that process is final and all the votes from the primaries and caucuses have been tabulated, I believe Kennedy will emerge as the Democratic nominee for president in 2024.

Cue the laughter and pejoratives. Most from the left. Some from the right. In our increasingly polarized times, everything seems to be viewed through the prisms of ideology, tribalism, anger, hate and the outright dismissal of voices in opposition to our own. But if we choose to put down those often-distorted prisms and open our eyes, there are still facts, figures and pragmatic reasons as to why the less obvious (or the most ridiculed) might still be the correct answer.

My first reason for predicting a Kennedy nomination is that I am still not convinced President Joe Biden will actually run for reelection, primarily because of concerns regarding his advanced age and the perception of cognitive decline.

With regard to Biden’s age being a roadblock to a 2024 campaign, we have this from former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who was asked about it at the Financial Times Weekend Festival: “His age is an issue. And people have every right to consider it.”

In a Quinnipiac poll out this week, 65 percent of voters said they think Biden, 80, is too old for a second term. That’s a share that could very well continue to rise.

But for the moment, Biden has declared his intention to run for reelection. And therein lies reason number two why I believe Kennedy will be the eventual nominee. The longer Biden stays in the race, the more he hurts the chances of undeclared Democratic contenders such as Vice President Kamala Harris, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg or even former First Lady Michelle Obama. 

As Biden lets other potential candidates twist in the wind, Kennedy continues to crisscross the nation taking almost every media opportunity given to him — even and especially those on the right, such as Fox News and the New York Post.

Of course, one of the reasons Kennedy is appearing on conservative outlets is because many in the now-activist mainstream media refuse to give him a platform.

Back in 1975 and 1976, when former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter ran his longshot campaign for the White House, some in the media also refused to give him a platform. But they did so because they ignorantly dismissed his campaign as a joke, not because they were personally or ideologically opposed to his policies.

Today, many in the media refuse to have Kennedy on because they are outraged that he dared to question the lockdowns, masking and vaccine mandates that came in the wake of the COVID-19 virus. Additionally, I believe many of them are simply running interference for the Biden White House. 

But again, there is a real danger in viewing the political process with ideological blinders permanently attached to your face. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently used a statement in a lawsuit over the Title 42 public health order to give a scathing overview of how civil liberties were trampled during the COVID era. 

The U.S., he wrote, may “have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country….Executive officials across the country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes. They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private. They closed churches even as they allowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on. They threatened violators not just with civil penalties but with criminal sanctions too.”

Many on the left now condemning Kennedy as an “anti-vaxxer” might have no problem with these draconian actions. But guess what? Tens of millions of Americans did and still do.

These Americans are going to be very open to hearing Kennedy’s voice as he barnstorms the nation in the face of a liberal media blackout. 

The next reason why I believe Kennedy will prevail is that he is far from the “one issue” candidate some in the media believe him to be. He is speaking to multiple issues a majority of voters want addressed — issues which have been upending their quality of life for years.

Kennedy’s “ace in the hole” may very well be his simplified campaign message: “Tell the truth.” He pledges to roll up his sleeves much like his dad did in the 1960s and engage in honest conversations with the people. 

Next, because of the Kennedy name coupled with his own stated values, RFK Jr. will make tremendous inroads with Black, Hispanic and disenfranchised voters — a large part of the Democratic base.

After Kennedy met with the editorial board of the New York Post, the editors wrote: “Kennedy has real conviction and charisma, and he’s fiercely independent of many of the party’s reigning pieties — all of which should appeal.”

His message should most especially appeal considering the latest Monmouth University poll declaring that only 16 percent of respondents said the U.S. is headed in the right direction.

Biden’s drug price controls are disastrous — are they also unconstitutional?Who is lying? Merrick Garland or the whistleblowers?

Sixteen percent.

The headline for that Post editorial read: “Biden’s a fool to ignore the RFK Jr. challenge.” To that list of “fools” I would add the activist media and the Democratic Party. Despise him all you want, but Kennedy is already polling at 20 percent against Biden as his pragmatic voice continues to reach more and more Americans in search of a champion. 

Douglas MacKinnon, a political and communications consultant, was a writer in the White House for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and former special assistant for policy and communications at the Pentagon during the last three years of the Bush administration.

Randy Benson at AU on June 10, 2023

 Randolph Benson

And We Are All Mortal:

A Commemoration of the 60th anniversary of JFK’s American University “Peace Speech”

Delivered by Randolph Benson

12 Noon, June 10, 2023

We gather today to commemorate the 60th anniversary of John F. Kennedy's American University commencement address, also known as his "Peace Speech", here at the very spot of the speech.

This gathering was first held in 1999 by Coalition on Political Assassinations co-founders John Judge and Bill Kelly, and longtime COPA board member, T Carter. I first came in 2002, where I filmed the first frames of my film The Searchers. John Judge held this every year until his death in April 2014. While no one can possibly replace John, as a former member of COPA and a mentee of John’s, I felt it was important to continue this tradition, and I’ve held this every year since John’s death and will continue to do so as long as I’m able.

In the spring of 1963 President Kennedy began to feel that there was a possibility for some kind of new movement in our relations with the Soviet Union. He began to look for an opportunity to make what was described by National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy as a “peace speech.” This was a project that was kept extremely confidential in the White House. Bundy began in a quiet way to get from two or three members of the White House staff ideas which might go into such a speech. Speechwriter and presidential advisor Ted Sorensen worked on it. The president thought a great deal about it, talked with Sorensen and Bundy and made clear the point of view and the ideas that he wanted.

A draft of the speech emerged and it was shown to a small group in the White House. The president had been in Hawaii and on the Friday before the Monday commencement Ted Sorensen flew to Honolulu with the draft of the speech and the president worked on his final revisions on his way back to Washington.

According to Presidential historian Arthur Schlesinger, the speech was not shown to the State Department or to the Defense Department until two days before the speech.

At noon on Monday, June 10, 1963 Kennedy addressed the graduating class of American University delivering the following words (abridged):

There are few earthly things more beautiful than a university wrote John Masefield and his tribute to English universities and his words are equally true today. He didn't refer to spires or towers, to campus dreams and ivied walls. Masefield admired the splendid beauty of the university, he said, because it was “a place where those who hate ignorance may strive to know, for those who perceive truth may strive to make others see.”

I have therefore chosen this time in this place to discuss a topic on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely perceived. Yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace. What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana, forced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I'm talking about genuine peace. The kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living; the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children. Not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women. Not merely peace in our time, but peace for all time. I speak of peace because of the new face of war.

First let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many of us think it's impossible. Too many think it’s unreal. But that is a dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed and that we are gripped by forces we cannot control. We need not accept that view. Our problems are man-made therefore they can be solved by man; and man can be as big as he wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man's reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable and we believe they can do it again.

There is no single, simple key to this peace; no grand or magic formula to be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static, changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a process -- a way of solving problems.

No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievements in science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture, in acts of courage.

So let us not be blind to our differences, but let us also direct attention to our common interests and the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures. And we are all mortal.

We shall also do our part to build a world of peace where the weak are safe and the strong are just. We are not helpless before that task or hopeless of its success. Confident and unafraid, we must labor on -- not towards a strategy of annihilation but towards a strategy of peace.

This speech was immediately to become known around the world as JFK’s Peace Speech. This speech received very little coverage in the news here in the United States, however it was front page news in papers around the world. In fact, Soviet Premier Kruschev ordered the speech to appear of the front page of the state newspaper, Pravda.

JFK then aggressively initiated a number of unilateral policy changes in line with what he expressed in this speech:

On June 28, JFK signed and had delivered to the Joint Chiefs of Staff National Security Action Memorandums – NSAMs - 55, 56, 57, which ordered:

The Joint Chiefs of Staff would be wholly responsible for all covert and paramilitary actions in peacetime, which was effectively removing all power from the CIA and placing it within the Pentagon, who answered directly to the President, with all of the oversight of the Executive and Legislative branches.

This has been accepted as JFK’s first step in “splintering the CIA into a thousand pieces and scattering them into the winds”, as he said he would after the Bay of Pigs in 1961.

On August 5, representatives of the United States, Soviet Union and Great Britain signed the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which prohibited the testing of nuclear weapons in outer space, underwater or in the atmosphere.

On September 20, President John F. Kennedy gave a speech at the United Nations that proposed converting the “moon race” to a cooperative venture with the Soviet Union.

On September 21, JFK ordered the evaluation of massive wheat sales to the Soviet Union, and talks began between our two countries on September 30 and lasted until November 5. The agreement had then begun its process of inter- and intra-governmental review.

On October 11, he signed NSAM 263, and delivered it to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It reads, in part:

At a meeting on October 5, 1963, the President considered the recommendations contained in the report of Secretary McNamara and General Taylor on their mission to South Vietnam.

The President approved the... implementation of plans to withdraw 1,000 U.S. military personnel by the end of 1963. We recommend that:

A program be established to train Vietnamese so

that essential functions now performed by U.S. military personnel can be carried out by Vietnamese by the end of 1965. It should be possible to withdraw the bulk of U.S. personnel by that time.

President Kennedy was assassinated about six weeks later, on November 22. On November 26, just four days after the assassination, the new president, Lyndon Johnson, signed NSAM 273 which reversed Kennedy’s Vietnam withdrawal policy, approved an expansion of America’s involvement in the Vietnam war and approved covert military and non-military action into Cambodia and Laos, which put the CIA back in its pre-NSAM 263 position.

In the following months, the wheat sales were scrapped, nuclear testing re-started, the expansion of the military state accelerated as well as the war in Vietnam.

However, on this spot, at the moment, 60 years ago, President John F. Kennedy gave us his vision for peace. For that he was murdered. For that, we must find common ground, acknowledge our shared humanity, and work together. As JFK stated, “confident and unafraid, we must labor on...towards a strategy of peace”.

Thank you.

Sunday, May 21, 2023

Defense Production Act (DPA)


Defense Production Act - DPA 

OpenCongress - U.S. Congress - H.R.6894 Defense Production Act ...HR6894 Defense Production Act Extension and Reauthorization of 2008 on ... OpenCongress is a joint project of the Participatory Politics Foundation and the ...

www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6894/show - 43k - Cached - Similar pages -

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.6894:

Most recent GEO Report :
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08854.pdf


NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (64 Stat. 798; 50 U.S.C. App. 2061, et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:


PART I - PURPOSE, POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION

Section 101. Purpose. This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense industrial resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended ("the Act"), except for the amendments to Title III of the Act in the Energy Security Act of 1980 and telecommunication authorities under Executive Order No. 12472.

Sec. 102. Policy. The United States must have an industrial and technology base capable of meeting national defense requirements, and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency. The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to all threats to the national security of the United States.

Sec. 103. General Functions. Federal departments and agencies responsible for defense acquisition (or for industrial resources needed to support defense acquisition) shall:

(a) Identify requirements for the full spectrum of national security emergencies, including military, industrial, and essential civilian demand;

(b) Assess continually the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of adequate industrial resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel;

(c) Be prepared, in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States, to take actions necessary to ensure the availability of adequate industrial resources and production capability, including services and critical technology for national defense requirements;

(d) Improve the efficiency and responsiveness, to defense requirements, of the domestic industrial base; and

(e) Foster cooperation between the defense and commercial sectors for research and development and for acquisition of materials, components, and equipment to enhance industrial base efficiency and responsiveness.

Sec. 104. Implementation.

(a) The National Security Council is the principal forum for consideration and resolution of national security resource preparedness policy.

(b) The Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency ("Director, FEMA") shall:

(1) Serve as an advisor to the National Security Council on issues of national security resource preparedness and on the use of the authorities and functions delegated by this order;

(2) Provide for the central coordination of the plans and programs incident to authorities and functions delegated under this order, and provide guidance and procedures approved by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs to the Federal departments and agencies under this order;

(3) Establish procedures, in consultation with Federal departments and agencies assigned functions under this order, to resolve in a timely and effective manner conflicts and issues that may arise in implementing the authorities and functions delegated under this order; and

(4) Report to the President periodically concerning all program activities conducted pursuant to this order.

(c) The head of every Federal department and agency assigned functions under this order shall ensure that the performance of these functions is consistent with National Security Council policy and guidelines.


PART II - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

Sec. 201. Delegations of Priorities and Allocations.

(a) The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1) The Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2) The Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3) The Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4) The Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5) The Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6) The Secretary of Commerce for all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

(b) The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the heads of those departments and agencies specified in subsection 201(a) of this order, shall administer the Defense Priorities and Allocations System ("DPA") regulations that will be used to implement the authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act as delegated to the Secretary of Commerce in subsection 201(a)(6) of this order. The Secretary of Commerce will re-delegate to the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other departments and agencies as appropriate, authority for the priority rating of contracts and orders for all materials, services, and facilities needed in support of programs approved under section 202 of this order. The Secretary of Commerce shall act as appropriate upon Special Priorities Assistance requests in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the need at hand.

(c) The Director, FEMA, shall attempt to resolve issues or disagreements on priorities or allocations between Federal departments or agencies in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the issue at hand and, if not resolved, such issues will be referred to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs for final determination.

(d) The head of each Federal department or agency assigned functions under subsection 201(a) of this order, when necessary, shall make the finding required under subsection 101(b) of the Act. This finding shall be submitted for the President's approval through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. Upon such approval the head of the Federal department or agency that made the finding may use the authority of subsection 101(a) of the Act to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.

(e) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs is hereby delegated the authority under subsection 101(c)(3) of the Act, and will be assisted by the Director, FEMA, in ensuring the coordinated administration of the Act.

Sec. 202. Determinations. The authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:

(a) By the Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, stockpiling, outer space, and directly related activities;

(b) By the Secretary of Energy with respect to energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities; and

(c) By the Director, FEMA, with respect to essential civilian needs supporting national defense, including civil defense and continuity of government and directly related activities.

Sec. 203. Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies. The authority of the President to perform the functions provided by subsection 101(c) of the Act is delegated to the Secretary of Commerce, who shall redelegate to the Secretary of Energy the authority to make the findings described in subsection 101(c)(2)(A) that the materials (including equipment), services, and facilities are critical and essential. The Secretary of Commerce shall make the finding described in subsection 101(c)(2)(A) of the Act that the materials (including equipment), services, or facilities are scarce, and the finding described in subsection 101(c)(2)(B) that it is necessary to use the authority provided by subsection 101(c)(1).

Sec. 204. Chemical and Biological Warfare. The authority of the President conferred by subsection 104(b) of the Act is delegated to the Secretary of Defense. This authority may not be further delegated by the Secretary.


PART III - EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY AND SUPPLY

Sec. 301.

(a) Financing Institution Guarantees. To expedite or expand production and deliveries or services under government contracts for the procurement of industrial resources or critical technology items essential to the national defense, the head of each Federal department or agency engaged in procurement for the national defense (referred to as "agency head" in this part) and the President and Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (in cases involving capacity expansion, technological development, or production in foreign countries) are authorized to guarantee in whole or in part any public or private financing institution, subject to provisions of section 301 of the Act. Guarantees shall be made in consultation with the Department of the Treasury as to the terms and conditions thereof. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") shall be informed when such guarantees are to be made.

(b) Direct Loan Guarantees. To expedite or expand production and deliveries or services under government contracts for the procurement of industrial resources or critical technology items essential to the national defense, each agency head is authorized to make direct loan guarantees from funds appropriated to their agency for Title III.

(c) Fiscal Agent. Each Federal Reserve Bank is designated and authorized to act, on behalf of any guaranteeing agency, as fiscal agent in the making of guarantee contracts and in otherwise carrying out the purposes of section 301 of the Act.

(d) Regulations. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is authorized, after consultation with heads of guaranteeing departments and agencies, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director, OMB, to prescribe regulations governing procedures, forms, rates of interest, and fees for such guarantee contracts.

Sec. 302. Loans.

(a) To expedite production and deliveries or services to aid in carrying out government contracts for the procurement of industrial resources or a critical technology item for the national defense, an agency head is authorized, subject to the provisions of section 302 of the Act, to submit to the Secretary of the Treasury or the President and Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (in cases involving capacity expansion, technological development, or production in foreign countries) applications for loans.

(b) To expedite or expand production and deliveries or services under government contracts for the procurement of industrial resources or critical technology items essential to the national defense, each agency head may make direct loans from funds appropriated to their agency for Title III.

(c) After receiving a loan application and determining that financial assistance is not otherwise available on reasonable terms, the Secretary of the Treasury or the President and Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (in cases involving capacity expansion, technological development, or production in foreign countries) may make loans, subject to provisions of section 302 of the Act.

Sec. 303. Purchase Commitments.

(a) In order to carry out the objectives of the Act, and subject to the provisions of section 303 thereof, an agency head is authorized to make provision for purchases of, or commitments to purchase, an industrial resource or a critical technology item for government use or resale.

(b) Materials acquired under section 303 of the Act that exceed the needs of the programs under the Act may be transferred to the National Defense Stockpile, if such transfer is determined by the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager to be in the public interest.

Sec. 304. Subsidy Payments. In order to ensure the supply of raw or non-processed materials from high-cost sources, an agency head is authorized to make subsidy payments, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director, OMB, and subject to the provisions of section 303(c) of the Act.

Sec. 305. Determinations and Findings. When carrying out the authorities in sections 301 through 303 of this order, an agency head is authorized to make the required determinations, judgments, statements, certifications, and findings, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy or Director, FEMA, as appropriate. The agency head shall provide a copy of the determination, judgment, statement, certification, or finding to the Director, OMB, to the Director, FEMA, and, when appropriate, to the Secretary of the Treasury.

Sec. 306. Strategic and Critical Materials.

(a) The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager and subject to the provisions of section 303 of the Act, is authorized to encourage the exploration, development, and mining of critical and strategic materials and other materials.

(b) An agency head is authorized, pursuant to section 303(g) of the Act, to make provision for the development of substitutes for strategic and critical materials, critical components, critical technology items, and other industrial resources to aid the national defense.

(c) An agency head is authorized, pursuant to section 303(a)(1)(B) of the Act, to make provisions to encourage the exploration, development, and mining of critical and strategic materials and other materials.

Sec. 307. Government-owned Equipment. An agency head is authorized, pursuant to section 303(e) of the Act, to install additional equipment, facilities, processes, or improvements to facilities owned by the government and to install government-owned equipment in industrial facilities owned by private persons.

Sec. 308. Identification of Shortfalls. Except during periods of national emergency or after a Presidential determination in accordance with sections 301(e)(1)(D)(ii), 302(c)(4)(B), or 303(a)(7)(B) of the Act, no guarantee, loan or other action pursuant to sections 301, 302, and 303 of the Act to correct an industrial shortfall shall be taken unless the shortfall has been identified in the Budget of the United States or amendments thereto.

Sec. 309. Defense Production Act Fund Manager. The Secretary of Defense is designated the Defense Production Act Fund Manager, in accordance with section 304(f) of the Act, and shall carry out the duties specified in that section, in consultation with the agency heads having approved Title III projects and appropriated Title III funds.

Sec. 310. Critical Items List.

(a) Pursuant to section 107(b)(1)(A) of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall identify critical components and critical technology items for each item on the Critical Items List of the Commanders-in-Chief of the Unified and Specified Commands and other items within the inventory of weapon systems and defense equipment.

(b) Each agency head shall take appropriate action to ensure that critical components or critical technology items are available from reliable sources when needed to meet defense requirements during peacetime, graduated mobilization, and national emergency. "Appropriate action" may include restricting contract solicitations to reliable sources, restricting contract solicitations to domestic sources (pursuant to statutory authority), stockpiling critical components, and developing substitutes for critical components or critical technology items.

Sec. 311. Strengthening Domestic Capability. An agency head, in accordance with section 107(a) of the Act, may utilize the authority of Title III of the Act or any other provision of law, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to provide appropriate incentives to develop, maintain, modernize, and expand the productive capacities of domestic sources for critical components, critical technology items, and industrial resources essential for the execution of the national security strategy of the United States.

Sec. 312. Modernization of Equipment. An agency head, in accordance with section 108(b) of the Act, may utilize the authority of Title III of the Act to guarantee the purchase or lease of advance manufacturing equipment and any related services with respect to any such equipment for purposes of the Act.


PART IV - IMPACT OF OFFSETS

Sec. 401. Offsets.

(a) The responsibilities and authority conferred upon the President by section 309 of the Act with respect to offsets are delegated to the Secretary of Commerce, who shall function as the President's Executive Agent for carrying out this authority.

(b) The Secretary of Commerce shall prepare the annual report required by section 309(a) of the Act in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense, Treasury, Labor, State, the United States Trade Representative, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, the Director of Central Intelligence, and the heads of other departments and agencies as required. The heads of Federal departments and agencies shall provide the Secretary of Commerce with such information as may be necessary for the effective performance of this function.

(c) The offset report shall be subject to the normal interagency clearance process conducted by the Director, OMB, prior to the report's submission by the President to Congress.


PART V - VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES

Sec. 501. Appointments. The authority of the President under sections 708(c) and (d) of the Act is delegated to the heads of each Federal department or agency, except that, insofar as that authority relates to section 101 of the Act, it is delegated only to the heads of each Federal department or agency assigned functions under section 201(a) of this order. The authority delegated under this section shall be exercised pursuant to the provisions of section 708 of the Act, and copies and the status of the use of such delegations shall be furnished to the Director, FEMA.

Sec. 502. Advisory Committees. The authority of the President under section 708(d) of the Act and delegated in section 501 of this order (relating to establishment of advisory committees) shall be exercised only after consultation with, and in accordance with, guidelines and procedures established by the Administrator of General Services.


PART VI - EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL

Sec. 601. National Defense Executive Reserve.

(a) In accordance with section 710(e) of the Act, there is established in the Executive Branch a National Defense Executive Reserve ("NDER") composed of persons of recognized expertise from various segments of the private sector and from government (except full-time federal employees) for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of an emergency that requires such employment.

(b) The head of any department or agency may establish a unit of the NDER in the department or agency and train members of that unit.

(c) The head of each department or agency with an NDER unit is authorized to exercise the President's authority to employ civilian personnel in accordance with section 703(a) of the Act when activating all or a part of its NDER unit. The exercise of this authority shall be subject to the provisions of subsections 601(d) and (e) of this order and shall not be re-delegated.

(d) The head of a department or agency may activate an NDER unit, in whole or in part, upon the written determination that an emergency affecting the national security or defense preparedness of the United States exists and that the activation of the unit is necessary to carry out the emergency program functions of the department or agency.

(e) At least 72 hours prior to activating the NDER unit, the head of the department or agency shall notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs of the impending activation and provide a copy of the determination required under subsection 601(d) of this order.

(f) The Director, FEMA, shall coordinate the NDER program activities of departments and agencies in establishing units of the Reserve; provide for appropriate guidance for recruitment, training, and activation; and issue necessary rules and guidance in connection with the program.

(g) This order suspends any delegated authority, regulation, or other requirement or condition with respect to the activation of any NDER unit, in whole or in part, or appointment of any NDER member that is inconsistent with the authorities delegated herein, provided that the aforesaid suspension applies only as long as sections 703(a) and 710(e) of the Act are in effect.

Sec. 602. Consultants. The head of each department or agency assigned functions under this order is delegated authority under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations. The authority delegated by this section shall not be re-delegated.


PART VII - LABOR SUPPLY

Sec. 701. Secretary of Labor. The Secretary of Labor, identified in this section as the Secretary, shall:

(a) Collect, analyze, and maintain data needed to make a continuing appraisal of the nation's labor requirements and the supply of workers for purposes of national defense. All agencies of the government shall cooperate with the Secretary in furnishing information necessary for this purpose, to the extent permitted by law;

(b) In response to requests from the head of a Federal department or agency engaged in the procurement for national defense, consult with and advise that department or agency with respect to (1) the effect of contemplated actions on labor supply and utilization, (2) the relation of labor supply to materials and facilities requirements, and (3) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;

(c) Formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting defense and essential civilian labor requirements;

(d) Project skill shortages to facilitate meeting defense and essential civilian needs and establish training programs;

(e) Determine the occupations and skills critical to meeting the labor requirements of defense and essential civilian activities and, with the assistance of the Secretary of Defense, the Director of Selective Service, and such other persons as the Director, FEMA, may designate, develop policies regulating the induction and deferment of personnel for the armed services, except for civilian personnel in the reserves; and

(f) Administer an effective labor-management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order with the cooperation of other Federal agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.


PART VIII - DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE INFORMATION AND REPORTS

Sec. 801. Foreign Acquisition of Companies. The Secretary of the Treasury, in cooperation with the Department of State, the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Energy, the Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General, and the Director of Central Intelligence, shall complete and furnish a report to the President and then to Congress in accordance with the requirements of section 721(k) of the Act concerning foreign efforts to acquire United States companies involved in research, development, or production of critical technologies and industrial espionage activities directed by foreign governments against private U.S. companies.

Sec. 802. Defense Industrial Base Information System.

(a) The Secretary of Defense and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, shall establish an information system on the domestic defense industrial base in accordance with the requirements of section 722 of the Act.

(b) In establishing the information system required by subsection (a) of this order, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, as determined by the Secretary of Defense in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, shall consult with each other for the purposes of performing the duties listed in section 722(d)(1) of the Act.

(c) The Secretary of Defense shall convene a task force consisting of the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of each military department and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, as determined by the Secretary of Defense in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, to carry out the duties under section 722(d)(2) of the Act.

(d) The Secretary of Defense shall report to Congress on a strategic plan for developing a cost-effective, comprehensive information system capable of identifying on a timely, ongoing basis vulnerability in critical components and critical technology items. The plans shall include an assessment of the performance and cost-effectiveness of procedures specified in section 722(b) of the Act.

(e) The Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Bureau of the Census, shall consult with the Secretary of Defense and the Director, FEMA, to improve the usefulness of information derived from the Census of Manufacturers in carrying out section 722 of the Act.

(f) The Secretary of Defense shall perform an analysis of the production base for not more than two major weapons systems of each military department in establishing the information system under section 722 of the Act. Each analysis shall identify the critical components of each system.

(g) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies as appropriate, shall issue a biennial report on critical components and technology in accordance with section 722(e) of the Act.


PART IX - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 901. Definitions. In addition to the definitions in section 702 of the Act, the following definitions apply throughout this order:

(a) "Civil transportation" includes movement of persons and property by all modes of transportation in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and, without limitation, related public storage and warehousing, ports, services, equipment and facilities, such as transportation carrier shop and repair facilities. However, "civil transportation" shall not include transportation owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, use of petroleum and gas pipelines, and coal slurry pipelines used only to supply energy production facilities directly. As applied herein, "civil transportation" shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership.

(b) Energy means all forms of energy including petroleum, gas (both natural and manufactured), electricity, solid fuels (including all forms of coal, coke, coal chemicals, coal liquification, and coal gasification), and atomic energy, and the production, conservation, use, control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of energy.

(c) "Farm equipment" means equipment, machinery, and repair parts manufactured for use on farms in connection with the production or preparation for market use of food resources.

(d) "Fertilizer" means any product or combination of products that contain one or more of the elements -- nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium -- for use as a plant nutrient.

(e) "Food resources" means all commodities and products, simple, mixed, or compound, or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption. "Food resources" also means all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, cotton, tobacco, wool, mohair, hemp, flax fiber, and naval stores, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.

(f) "Food resource facilities" means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on-farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, livestock and poultry feed and seed, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer (excluding transportation thereof).

(g) "Functions" include powers, duties, authority, responsibilities, and discretion.

(h) "Head of each Federal department or agency engaged in procurement for the national defense" means the heads of the Departments of Defense, Energy, and Commerce, as well as those departments and agencies listed in Executive Order No. 10789.

(i) "Heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies" as used in part VIII of this order means the heads of such other Federal agencies and departments that acquire information or need information with respect to making any determination to exercise any authority under the Act.

(j) "Health resources" means materials, facilities, health supplies, and equipment (including pharmaceutical, blood collecting and dispensing supplies, biological, surgical textiles, and emergency surgical instruments and supplies) required to prevent the impairment of, improve, or restore the physical and mental health conditions of the population.

(k) "Metals and minerals" means all raw materials of mineral origin (excluding energy) including their refining, smelting, or processing, but excluding their fabrication.

(l) "Strategic and Critical Materials" means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national security emergency, and (2) are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.

(m) "Water resources" means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, which can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements.

Sec. 902. General.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 902(c) of this order, the authorities vested in the President by title VII of the Act may be exercised and performed by the head of each department and agency in carrying out the delegated authorities under the Act and this order.

(b) The authorities which may be exercised and performed pursuant to subsection 902(a) of this order shall include (1) the power to redelegate authorities, and to authorize the successive re-delegation of authorities, to departments and agencies, officers, and employees of the government, and (2) the power of subpoena with respect to authorities delegated in parts II, III, and IV of this order, provided that the subpoena power shall be utilized only after the scope and purpose of the investigation, inspection, or inquiry to which the subpoena relates have been defined either by the appropriate officer identified in subsection 902(a) of this order or by such other person or persons as the officer shall designate.

(c) Excluded from the authorities delegated by subsection 902(a) of this order are authorities delegated by parts V, VI, and VIII of this order and the authority with respect to fixing compensation under section 703(a) of the Act.

Sec. 903. Authority. All previously issued orders, regulations, rulings, certificates, directives, and other actions relating to any function affected by this order shall remain in effect except as they are inconsistent with this order or are subsequently amended or revoked under proper authority. Nothing in this order shall affect the validity or force of anything done under previous delegations or other assignment of authority under the Act.

Sec. 904. Effect on other Orders.

(a) The following are superseded or revoked:

(1) Section 3, Executive Order No. 8248 of September 8, 1939, (4 FR 3864).

(2) Executive Order No. 10222 of March 8, 1951 (16 FR 2247).

(3) Executive Order No. 10480 of August 14, 1953 (18 FR 4939).

(4) Executive Order No. 10647 of November 28, 1955 (20 FR 8769).

(5) Executive Order No. 11179 of September 22, 1964 (29 FR 13239).

(6) Executive Order No. 11355 of May 26, 1967 (32 FR 7803).

(7) Sections 7 and 8, Executive Order No. 11912 of April 13, 1976 (41 FR 15825, 15826-27).

(8) Section 3, Executive Order No. 12148 of July 20, 1979 (44 FR 43239, 43241).

(9) Executive Order No. 12521 of June 24, 1985 (50 FR 26335).

(10) Executive Order No. 12649 of August 11, 1988 (53 FR 30639).

(11) Executive Order No. 12773 of September 26, 1991 (56 FR 49387), except that part of the order that amends section 604 of Executive Order 10480.

(b) Executive Order No. 10789 of November 14, 1958, is amended by deleting "and in view of the existing national emergency declared by Proclamation No. 2914 of December 16, 1950,î as it appears in the first sentence.

(c) Executive Order No. 11790, as amended, relating to the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, is amended by deleting "Executive Order No. 10480" where it appears in section 4 and substituting this order's number.

(d) Subject to subsection 904(c) of this order, to the extent that any provision of any prior Executive order is inconsistent with the provisions of this order, this order shall control and such prior provision is amended accordingly.

Sec. 905. Judicial Review. This order is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.


THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 3, 1994

 

Friday, April 28, 2023

Dear David, Re: Spy Among Friends

 Dear David Talbot

Having read your recent mention of the British TV series Spy Among Friends, I realize you were judging the art and acting, however I’d like to call your attention to my reaction to the series and the possible implications for JFK research.

https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2023/03/spy-among-friends-at-dealey-plaza.html

https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2023/03/spy-among-friends-continued.html

https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2023/04/spy-among-friends-iii-more-jfk.html

I consider uncovering Philby and the Cambridge spy ring a Deep Political Event in the Peter Dale Scott mold, one that still has important implications as far as security and secrets go.

And John Newman’s Uncovering Popov’s Mole has some important things to say about it.

The duplicity between competing government intelligence agencies should be exposed because the public is also dupped as well.

Bill Kelly

April, 2023

Billkelly3@gmail.com

Sunday, March 5, 2023

12 Reasons - With Commentary

 12 Reasons Why Oswald Wasn't the 6th Floor Shooter

JFKcountercoup Thursday, March 24, 2022 

1) There is no evidence Oswald ever bought or owned bullets or ever shot that rifle at any time. 

J. r. Bonner: you buy them with cash and don't get a receipt . i do it all the time till this day .

Frank Badalson   - J.r. Bonner this nonsense of buying bullets...and having to prove someone bought bullets.......is the most ludicrous thought one can have....not surprising he thinks this way. In no case in history has it been required to prove that a suspect bought bullets for their gun that they shot someone with. Absolutely a most profound poorly informed remark.

BK: Well, former FBI agent Bill Turner said that “when investigating hired killings and political assassinations it’s not who pulled the trigger that counts, but who bought the bullets.”

Daniel Girard: There is no evidence he did not either. However, there is a testimony from a Dr Homer Wood stating that he saw Oswald practicing in the Sportdome Gun Range. So, if this story is true, it means that Oswald must have bought bullets somewhere at some time. But then, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

Girard Also says: There is no evidence he did not either. However, there is a testimony from a Dr Homer Wood stating that he saw Oswald practicing in the Sportdome Gun Range. So, if this story is true, it means that Oswald must have bought bullets somewhere at some time. But then, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

Vicente S. Velasco  - William Kelly, I read your article and your arguments are weak. Here is a rebuttal for your first five points:  The first point is very weak. As it applied to Oswald, there was no law or regulation that prohibited him from purchasing ammunition. He could buy the ammo from anywhere it was available. There would be no paper records of the purchase unlike that of firearms. He could have just bought it locally and there would be no record thereof.

 2) Oswald's brother Robert wrote in his book - "If Lee did not practice with that rifle in the days and weeks before the assassination he didn't take the shots that killed the president and wounded governor Connally." And the WC says the rifle remained in the blanket in the Paines garage from the time it was brought back from New Orleans until the morning of the assassination, and was never used for practice. 

Daniel Girard: The correct phrase in the book is:” If Lee did not practice with that rifle in the days and weeks before the assassination, then I would say that he didn't take the shots that killed the president and wounded governor Connally.” Robert says this because of the ”eagerness by the Commission to dismiss the one group of witnesses who give us a clear idea of when and where and how Lee learned to use his new rifle with the precision he displayed on November 22”. And the WC has no witness to claim the rifle did not move from the Paines garage before November 22. But then, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

Vincent Velasco:  Another weak argument. Whether Oswald found time to practice on his rifle is irrelevant. He could have just done some dry-firing on his rifle to work out the kinks, and squeeze off some rounds in some secluded area. Note that he bought the rifle because he wanted to kill General Walker and would not have seen the necessity of using it until he read about the motorcade by the 20th of November. And there was no doubt in Robert Oswald's mind that his brother did it.

 3) Both persons - the only persons to eyeball the package Oswald put in the back seat of Frazers car, Fraser and his sister said the package was too small to contain the rifle, even when broken down. 

Since neither Randle nor Frazier did precisely measure the package and the rifle, it is difficult to ascertain. Randle said the package could have measured “more than 2 feet”. This is quite crude and not explored enough in her testimony. And Frazier “did not pay much attention to it” to be able to measure its length. But then, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

VV:  Buell Frazier did not pay much attention to the package and accepted Oswald's curtain rod explanation without question. How could he know the exact dimensions of the bag?

 4) When breaking for lunch the floor laying crew raced down on both elevators and Oswald told them to send one back up for him, clearly indicating his intention to return to the lower floors. 

DG: Since both elevators were still on the upper floors after the shooting, this is an indication that Oswald did not use either of them. But then, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 5) Shelley saw Oswald on the first floor at 12 noon standing by the telephone, as if waiting for a call. 

DG: This, if true, happened 30 minutes before the shooting, therefore, it is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 6) Oswald said that while reading a newspaper in the Domino Room on the first floor, where his jacket was later found on a window sill, he noticed two black workers walk past who were on the way to the 5th floor. They later testified they did walk past the Dominio Room, so how did Oswald know they went by if he wasn't there? 

DG: The two black workers denied having seen Oswald anywhere after 11:55. So you have the choice between believing Oswald, who pathologically lied during interrogation, or two witnesses who had nothing to gain to lie. And Oswald could have deposited his jacket in the morning. The fact that he did not pick it up after the shots shows how hurried he may have been to leave the building. Still, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 7) A secretary said she saw Oswald on the lower floors at 12:15, when people on the street saw a man with a rifle on the 6th floor, a man who could not have been Oswald if he was on the lower floors. 

DG: Mrs Arnold said 12:15, then 12:25. And don’t forget that she said she “caught what she thought of a fleeting glimpse of someone looking like Oswald”. In any case, she was standing outside and had her view to the inside of the building completely blocked by the people standing in the entrance of the TSBD. She likely saw Lovelady because he was wearing a similar pattern-checked shirt. And, even if she saw someone she thought was Oswald at 12:15, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

8) After watching the motorcade from the curb, TSBD VP Ochis Campbell told a reporter that when reentering the building he saw Oswald standing next to the storage cabinet under the stairs to the second floor.

DG: This is from the New York Herald Tribune article called “Capture: It’s all over now” which contains a mashup of early reports about the assassination (no reporter names mentioned), full of mistakes. And Campbell’s report is in direct contradiction with all his other statements. This cannot be used in trying to establish that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 9) If Oswald or anyone ran down the back stairs from the 6th floor they would have had to pass Dougherty on the 5th floor landing and the secretaries supervisor on the 4th floor landing, but didn't. 

DG: If Oswald or anyone ran down the back stairs from the 6th floor they would have had to pass Dougherty on the 5th floor landing and the secretaries supervisor on the 4th floor landing, but didn't.

Dougherty’s testimony is so full of hesitations and contradictions, it cannot be considered in any serious analysis of the case. And Styles and Adams testimonies indicate that they went down the stairs later than Oswald may have done. So, this cannot be considered as proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

DG: When DPD officer Baker arrived on the 2nd floor following Roy Truly, he noticed Oswald through the window of the closed door that led to the lunchroom and investigated. If Oswald was the 6th floor shooter and came down those steps, he would have had to go through that door, but didn't or Truly, ahead of Baker would have seen him moments before Baker saw him through the window. But Truly didn't see him because Oswald entered the hallway to the lunchroom from the secretaries office, the same way he left with a coke.

 10) When DPD officer Baker arrived on the 2nd floor following Roy Truly, he noticed Oswald through the window of the closed door that led to the lunchroom and investigated. If Oswald was the 6th floor shooter and came down those steps, he would have had to go through that door, but didn't or Truly, ahead of Baker would have seen him moments before Baker saw him through the window. But Truly didn't see him because Oswald entered the hallway to the lunchroom from the secretaries office, the same way he left with a coke. 

DG: One easier explanation is that Truly did not look in that direction, he was more focussed on going up the stairs. Still, this is no proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 

 11) If Oswald had been the 6th floor gunman, blew the president's head open, ran across the 6th floor, ditched the rifle, ran down the steps in less than 90 seconds, he would have been hyperventilating and out of breath, as Marina said he was an hour after the Walker shooting. But Truly, Baker and a secretary who saw him said Oswald was cool, calm and collected, and not like anyone who just killed someone and ran across a floor and down 4 flights of steps. 

DG: If Oswald had been the 6th floor gunman, blew the president's head open, ran across the 6th floor, ditched the rifle, ran down the steps in less than 90 seconds, he would have been hyperventilating and out of breath, as Marina said he was an hour after the Walker shooting. But Truly, Baker and a secretary who saw him said Oswald was cool, calm and collected, and not like anyone who just killed someone and ran across a floor and down 4 flights of steps.

Numerous people have recreated Oswald’s flight from the sniper’s nest to the 2nd floor lunchroom, taking time to “ditch the rifle” in less than 90 seconds, less than 60 seconds actually. Without running. And none was “out of breath”. This cannot be considered as a proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting because he had plenty of time to get to the lunchroom before Baker saw him.

 12) Both eye witnesses to the 6th floor gunman said he wore a white shirt, while Oswald wore brown. 

DG: Eyewitness testimony is notoriously inaccurate, this has been proven in several experiments involving dozens of people seeing the same event perpetrated by the same individual but could not be unanimous in his description. But then, in plain daylight, if you would happen to look at someone hiding in the shadow of a window and wearing a white T-shirt, this is what would have been visible. But then, eyewitnesses did see a gunman at the window of the 6th floor. It could have been Oswald so this cannot be considered as proof that Oswald .was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

VV  he did wear a white t-shirt . that day . he was arrested with it on

BK: A white undershirt, beneith the brown open colar shirt. So he took the brown shirt off to take the shots, then put it back on while he was running down the steps? That’s Vinnie Travolta dancing around the facts.

 13) Bonus item - Amos Eunis, one eye witnesses, said numerous times in his short WC testimony, that the 6th floor gunman had a very distinctive bald spot, a characteristic not shared with Oswald. 

DG: See previous item 10 about eyewitness testimony. This cannot be considered as proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 14) Brennan, the other eyewitnesses, told a policeman that if he saw the gunman again he would recognize him. Standing at the bottom of the front stairs next to a police car Brennan saw, recognized an d pointed out to a policeman the black workers from the 5th floor window, who were taken in for questioning. Moments later however, he didn't recognize Oswald as the 6th floor shooter as he walked out the door, went down the steps and walked east on Elm. 

DG: That is because he did not look at him, so simple. Yet, this cannot be considered as proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

 15) Going against those who claim he did it for historical recognition, Oswald denied committing the deed and told his brother not to believe "the so called evidence," and I think we should take that advice.

DG: Yes, we should take advice from everything Oswald has said during his interrogation, should we not? And you seem to forget that Robert Oswald is convinced his brother is guilty. Still, this cannot be considered as proof that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

BK Notes: Those who continue to maintain that Oswald was the lone shooter and there was no conspiracy must resolve each of these items, while if one is correct, Oswald is exonerated. And these are some of the reasons why most people do not believe Oswald was the lone assassin or the assassin at all and was what he claimed to be – a Patsy.

J.r. Bonner

i have limited knowledge

BK: We recognize that.

but i'll give your 12 questions a try .🤣🤣

2. oswald's brother said he did it . there's no evidence he didn't practice with it .

3. frazier said he didn't pay much attention to the package .

true frazier didn't believe the rifle would fit in the package .

4. clearly to have the elevator to go down to escape and not be seen on the stairs .

5. president was shot at 12:30

what he was doing at 12

isn't relevant .

why is this relevant ?

6. he had been working there for months , you do a normal routine . he knew that routine . and he knew they would be there .

7. which secretary are you referring to?

you'll have to be more specific . are you saying the one that saw him with a coke ?

8. how can he be under the cabinet when the dpd saw him in the lunchroom at the coke machine ?

was this after wards?

time?

9. he took the elevator you were crying about

in #4.

10. truly was one the first floor when baker came in

neither could see oswald on the second floor or how he got there .

11. no he wouldn't be out of breath , they've done this several times in re enactments . he had plenty of time .

12.

so i answered yours

let's see if you can answer mine .

who's rifle was found on the sixth floor of the tsbd that day ?

BK: Oswalds

2. was lho an employee

of the tsbd and at work that day ?

BK: Yes

who's palm print was found on the rifle barrel of the found gun on the 6 th floor that day ?

BK: Oswalds

when oswald was arrested what clothing did he have on in his mug shot?

He was arrested with a brown open collar shirt.

brennan saw oswald fire the rifle .

his description was pretty spot on .

BK:  Brennan didn’t ID Oswald.

how did he see oswald if he was in the lunch room?

was he in on the frame up?

why did oswald leave the building and go home and get a pistol

BK: He suspected somethi ng was up. If he knew he would need it why didn’t he take it with him to work?

who was alek hidell ?

BK: One of Oswald’s aliases

who is lee harvey oswald ?

BK: You tell me.

how did the bullets match up to the rifle ?

BK: The shells matched up to the rifle, only the magic bullet and the unspent bullet were left.

how did the casings match up to the rifle?

BK: You mean the shells? They had been run through that chamber at some point in time.

how did the casings match to the pistol ?

BK:  I don’t know.

Why don’t all conspiracy theories come to the same conclusion?

BK: I don’t study silly conspiracy theories, I am trying to resolve a homicide.

why is there 25 different ones and only one ln ?

BK: Because only one of them is correct.

 

Friday, February 17, 2023

FOREKNOWLEDGE AND JFK ASSASSINATION

 Foreknowledge & JFK Assassination

FOREKNOWLEDGE AND JFK ASSASSINATION

Sun Tzu said: “Now the reason the enlightened Prince and the wise general conquer the enemy whenever they move and their achievements surpass those of ordinary men is foreknowledge.”

“What is called foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits nor from gods. Nor by analogy with past events, nor from calculations. It must be obtained from men who know the enemy situation.” – The Art of War – Chapter XII – Employment of Secret Agents.

One of the hallmarks and “fingerprints of intelligence” that makes the assassination of President Kennedy a covert intelligence operation is the foreknowledge certain people had of the event, and expressing it to others before it occurred.

– Bray – See: Bray v. Bendix trial transcripts re: JEFCOTT.

– Cambridge, England – Telephone call. See: Bowen, Howard.

– Cheramie, Rose – Jack Ruby associate. See: Louisiana State Police (HSCA)

– Dinkin, Eugene B. – American soldier in Germany, claims to have picked up on the assassination plot from Army Security Agency monitor of OAS, the Algerian French Generals, went AOL and tried to inform American ambassador. See : Russell, Dick, TMWKTM.

– Grace, William – “Shortly before the assassination an executive of the Grace Lines was found unconscious in the street. Taken to a hospital, he mumbled that the president was to be shot. He had an appointment with Army Intelligence agents before he was found.” – (Paris Flamonde, The Kennedy Conspiracy). Also : “An executive of the Grace Lines suffered a concussion after coming into contact with an Army Intelligence agent. While in a delirium he said, ‘The President is in danger!…”. [Also NoteLHO wrote to mother/brother he “made reservations on a Grace liner.” ]

– Martinez, Jorge Soto – On Nov. 1, told Lillian Springler at Parrot Jungle in Miami JFK to be killed by “Lee, been to Russia, Mexico.” JSM lived in apartment above Mike McLaney’s garage, former Cuban Customs, worked at Fountainblu Hotel.

– Martino, John – To his wife, on the morning of the assassination (See: Summers, Vanity Fair, SWHT), also Larry Hancock’s “Someone Would Have Talked.”

– Milteer, Joseph – (RIP Feb. 28, 1974) Alias Samuel Steven Story. See: William Agusta Somerset – Agent 88 – undercover conversations. NO, April 63.

– Odio, Syliva – See: Fonzi, Gaeton (HSCA; The Last Investigation)/ Russell, Dick (TMWKTM).

– Oxnard, California telephone call – See: Peter Noyes, Legacy of Doubt.

– Paine, Michael – Was talking about political assassination as JFK was being killed.

– Philbrick, Herbert – See: Jean Hill. Philbrick expressed foreknowledge of the assassination.

– Rivera, Jose, Dr. (Col. USAR) – See: Adele Edisen (ARRB). Rivera not only expressed foreknowledge of JFK’s assassination, but also of his son Patrick’s premature death and that LHO would move into the apartment on Magazine Street, New Orleans before LHO knew.

– Underhill, G. Garrett – See: Turner, William, Ramparts.