Thursday, May 22, 2014

John Kerry on JFK Assassination Conspiracy

John Kerry on JFK Assassination: 



“To this day I have serious doubts that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I have doubts that he was motivated by himself. I’m not sure if anyone else was involved, with respect to the Grassy Knoll theory and all that, I don’t go down that road and the Grassy Knoll thing. But I have serious questions as to if they got to the bottom of Lee Harvey Oswald’s time and influence in Cuba and Russia.” 



As a Massachusetts native, Kerry chose to volunteer for Ted Kennedy’s senatorial campaign in 1962 and they remained close for the rest of the Senator’s life.
Kerry told Brokaw about the one time that he met John F. Kennedy at the White House when he was working for his brother and got a call saying that they were all going to go out for a sail in Washington.
‘I'm in between high school and going off to college and he said "Where you going?" and I said Yale and I grimaced knowing he was a Harvard guy and he looked at me and he said "No, no that's great now because I now have a Yale degree," Kerry said.
‘He had just gotten his Yale honorary degree and he couldn't have been nicer about it and talked to me about the campaign and what Teddy was doing, and we raced off and went sailing.

‘It was totally surreal.’

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?

Assassination Records Review Board - ARRB Director Jeremy Gunn is reported to have shown the tables of contents for five volumes of a History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Board (at a December 1997?) meeting to ask them to decide which volumes are responsive to the Act.


Included were two Volumes – Volume VIII: 1961-1964, Part II: ‘The Succession of Crisis,’ and Part III: ‘The Global Challenge,’ by Walter S. Poole.

If anyone has seen these records I'd like to hear from them: 
billkelly3@gmail.com 

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

84 NSA JFK Assassination Documents

In August 1997, the now Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), in a press release, stated that they were announcing the release of documents from the National Security Agency (NSA).

It was the responsibility of the now defunct Board to determine which records are to be made public immediately and which ones will have postponed release dates.

According to the announcement, the Board reviewed 84 NSA documents related to the assassination and released 6 open in full, 75 that are postponed in part, and postponed 3 documents in full.

The original records were transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration for inclusion in the JFK Collection, which is housed at the Archives II facility in College Park, Maryland.

Has anyone read these released records? 

If so please contact me: billkelly3@gmail.com 


Monday, May 12, 2014

With John Judge at the Archives II

With John Judge at the Archives II

I went to the National Archives with John many times, first to the old, original Archives, on Pennsylvania Avenue, and then to the Archives II when it opened in the early 1990s.

On the wall just outside the original Archives is the inscription: “WHAT IS PAST IS PROLOGUE.”  We thought that Prologue was a great name for the newsletter of the Committee (for an Open Archives), but after a few issues we learned that the official publication of the NARA was already called Prologue, so once COPA got going the name of the newsletter was changed to Open Secrets.

Once the Archives II in College Park opened, that’s where all of the attention shifted because that’s where they moved all of the JFK records and began to accept millions of documents from other agencies to become part of the JFK Assassination Records Collection. 

I had been registered at the old Archives as a Research Associate, but at the Archives II you have to sit down at a computer and register all your details to get an access pass, and they are very strict about entering with pens, books, papers etc., especially after Clinton’s former national security advisor was caught lifting some of his old memos in his socks.

One memorial occasion, while I photocopied the Andrews Log for 11/22/63, John had requested a number of boxes concerning the US military response to the assassination – DEFCON status.  He was also looking for any references to missing code books aboard B-52 bombers on 11/22/63.

While John was sitting at a table, reading from a cart of document folders next to him, I photocopied the Andrews Log, and then went into a little booth to read it. After concentrating on that for awhile I sat back and stretched, and recognized the guy in the next booth a few feet away from me. It was John Dean, the former White House lawyer and Watergate whistleblower. He said he was working on a biography of President Warren G. Harding, who I also had a personal interest in. Dean autographed the back of his business card for a friend of mine named John Dean, a Jersey Shore realtor, and he walked over with me so I could introduce him to John Judge.

John was all excited, having found the DEFCON status for 11/22/63 – which showed that the DEFCON status did not change for the CONUS, only in the Southeast Asia.  He also showed me a newspaper clip – a news report that Gen. LeMay was reported to have been killed in an airplane crash that day, later proved erroneous.

I was later disappointed in John Dean’s bio of President Harding, as I suspect Harding was assassinated by his enemies, and didn’t die accidently of food poisoning while on a train trip, as Dean relates. I base my opinion, not only on the very questionable circumstances of his death, but the fact that Clarence W. Barron, the founder of the Wall Street Journal, expressed foreknowledge of Harding’s impending death, as related by Mary Bancroft in her book “Autobiography of a Spy.”

I also got a phone call a few months ago, before John died, from a guy researching the DEFCON status and the missing code books of the Cabinet Plane 86972 and the B-52 SAC bomber, as reported by John Judge. 





John Judge and the Army Inspector's Report

John Judge and the Army Inspector General’s Report

One significant event happened in the summer of 1976, the Bicentennial year in Philadelphia when Legionnaires disease struck the Belleview Stratford hotel and nation was awash in intelligence agency scandals.

John Judge was living in Philadelphia and working at a Quaker Peace action organization on Walnut Street, just a block from Rittenhouse Square, where there was an Oswald sighting in the summer of 63’ and where all the hippies hung out. It was also where the hippest radio station WMMR FM was located.

When I was in high school, MMR was by day an elevator music station, but on Sunday nights guy by the name of Dave Herman changed the world by playing entire 33 1/3 record albums – an entertaining revolution that was labeled “Album Oriented Rock – AOR.” The success of Herman’s “Marconi Experiment” show led MMR to go with AOR 24-7, and they hired University of Penn grad Bill Vitka to run the news department, and he tailored it to the young and hip target audience.

From a friend in Washington John had acquired a recently released report by the US Army Inspector General on the Use of Human Subjects in Chemical Agent Research, which documented all of the military contracts with academic institutions and corporate companies that experimented with LSD and other psychotropic chemicals, ostensibly to learn their attributes for interrogation purposes.

I recalled meeting Ken Kesey at John’s Dayton apartment a few years earlier and talking with him about his early experimentation with LSD. Kesey said he first got it from a San Francisco professor who did his experiments for the CIA and he explained that they experimented mainly on students, soldiers and prisoners, who were all paid for participating.

Among the contracts listed at the end of the Army Inspector General’s Report were some local Philadelphia institutions including the University of Pennsylvania and Ivy Labs and a Dr. Kligman was affiliated with both places.

Knowing WMMR-FM radio news director Bill Vitka was a University of Penn grad, John and I walked to Rittenhouse Square to the WMMR studios where Vitka was glad to get a copy of the report and immediately began to make some phone calls to Penn and Ivy labs and he eventually got to Kligman and interviewed him. Vitka did a segment every day for over a week on the Philly connections to the military experiments, and credited me and John Judge for supplying him with the basic research and report.

While we were working with Vitka, some bells went off and he went over to a wall of reel to reel tape recorders and turned some on, and a few moments later a major Associated Press radio wire service news report came in. Two bells, Vitka said, was important breaking news – a fire or earthquake.  He’s heard three bells but the only time he knows of five bells being used was the Kennedy assassination.

Vitka left WMMR a year or so later and began working for a San Francisco based radio syndicate before returning to Philadelphia to get married and begin working for CBS radio in New York City. He is now a radio news reporter for Fox News radio network.

Kligman later became the subject of Allen M. Hornblum’s book “Acres of Skin”  (Routledge, 1998).


Wednesday, May 7, 2014

ARRB Final Report on ONI Docs

Final Report of the ARRB:
Chapter 8 Compliance with the JFK Act by Government Offices
14. Department of the Navy

After passage of the JFK Act, the Navy's Criminal Investigative Service transferred, in 1994, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) records that had been maintained on Lee Harvey Oswald.6 In 1995, the General Counsel of the Navy directed that a further review of the Navy's files be undertaken pursuant to the JFK Act. This directive went to the Chief of Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and the Naval Historical Center. The Navy identified no additional assassination records. 

In early 1997, after the navy consulted with Review Board staff regarding categories of potentially relevant records, the General Counsel's office issued another search directive to the Chief of Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Secretary of the Navy's Administrative Division, and other components within the Navy. The Review Board asked the Navy to search for files of high-level officials of the Marine Corps, the Office of Naval Intelligence, and the Navy during the years 1959 through 1964.

The Navy conducted an extensive review of files, including a review of files from the Secretary of the Navy's Administrative Office, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Marine Corps. The Navy located miscellaneous documents relating to the Warren Commission and HSCA from files of the Administrative Office for the Secretary of the Navy as a result of this search. Among the records found was an unsigned copy of an affidavit by the Director of ONI, prepared at the time of the Warren Commission, stating that Lee Harvey Oswald was not used as an agent or informant by ONI.


The Navy confirmed that it had not, however, located the 1959 1964 files for the Director of ONI.

Office of Naval Intelligence.

The Review Board pursued the matter of ONI records separately. Accordingly, the Board requested that ONI submit its own certification of its compliance with the JFK Act. In its Final Declaration of Compliance, ONI stated that it conducted an extensive review of ONI records held at Federal Records Centers throughout the country. ONI did not identify any additional assassination records. ONI was unable to find any relevant files for the Director of ONI from 1959 to 1964.

ONI also acknowledged that there were additional ONI records that were not reviewed for assassination records, but that these records would be reviewed under Executive Order 12958 requiring declassification of government records.

Rufus Taylor Director of Naval Intelligence June 1963 - May 1966

The Review Board requested that the Navy and ONI search for the records of Director of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral Rufus Taylor. The Review Board acquired a copy of an unsigned September 21, 1964, affidavit regarding Oswald that Taylor appears to have executed and forwarded to Secretary of Defense McNamara. The affidavit states that that ONI never utilized Lee Harvey Oswald as an agent or an informant. ONI did not locate any files belonging to Taylor.



SF 135 Request Forms

SF 135 Requests
Records Transmittal and Receipt, SF-135

Agencies can store records that are covered by a NARA-approved records disposition schedule or the General Records Schedule on a reimbursable basis.

Consistent with 36 CFR 1228.154(c)(vii), NARA records center facilities can accept unscheduled record series that have a SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority, logged and pending with NARA's Records Management Services (ACNR). Please insert "pending" in block 6h on the SF 135 and cite the schedule, the item number, and the date it submitted to NARA with a copy of the schedule.
No original signature is required.

One SF 135 is suggested for each transfer of temporary records. A separate SF 135 is required for each series of permanent or unscheduled records.

The NARA records center receiving an e-mail request to transfer records will complete the SF-135 and reply back via e-mail to the original e-mail address. Approved forms returned as "undeliverable" will be mailed. Please be certain that the transferring agency's mailing and e-mail address is included on the SF 135.
Preparing the Standard Form 135 (SF 135),

Records Transmittal and Receipt
General Instructions
Filling Out the SF 135

Item 1: Enter the name and address of the FRC to which you are submitting records. See the FRC Directors page for the most current address information. 
Item 2: Enter the name of the transferring agency official. To expedite and improve the transfer process for our customer agencies, FRCs will accept SF 135s without original signatures. Please note that your agency may have internal procedures that require signatures. If you are in doubt, please contact your agency's records officer. 
Item 3: Provide the name, office, business telephone number (including area code), and e-mail address of the person to contact about the records. 
Item 4: Completed by the FRC. 
Item 5: Provide the complete address of the transferring office. If records come from one office, but the SF 135 should be sent to a different office, please include BOTH addresses. Specify where the approved SF 135 should be sent, and where the final SF 135 should be sent. 
Item 6: This three-part number comprises the transfer number (formerly known as accession number) and is completed by the FRC after they receive the transfer. 
Item 6(a): Enter the NARA record group number assigned to the records of the agency (or component) making the transfer. 
Item 6(b): Enter the last two digits of the current fiscal year. 
Item 6(c): Unless NARA has granted authorization to your agency to pre-assign numbers, FRC staff will assign a sequential number in this column. 
Item 6(d): For transfer and billing purposes, a standard-size box equals one cubic foot. Enter the total number of boxes included in this transfer. If the records do not fit in a standard records center box, leave this column blank, add the dimensions of the container to item 6(f), and contact the FRC staff to verify acceptance. 
Item 6(e): Enter the inclusive range of numbers (e.g., 1-30). 
Item 6(f): Describe the records in sufficient detail to allow FRC personnel to verify compliance with your records schedule. You may wish to use the series description provided in your Records Control Schedule or the General Records Schedule. A complete series description includes the series title and inclusive dates (start and end) of the records.
Include the organizational component that created the records if the component is other than that described in item 5.
Indicate in this section if the series of records is subject to the Privacy Act. Since SF 135s are public records, information included on SF 135s (including folder title lists) should not contain National Security Classified information or information restricted by exemption B6, the Freedom of Information Act.
If the records are scheduled for permanent retention, are unscheduled, or if disposition instructions indicate sampling records is necessary, you must include a detailed folder listing for each box in item 6(f) (if space permits) or as an attachment. If you are submitting the SF 135 electronically, you may send the listing as a separate e-mail attachment.
Special description requirements apply for certain records and should be stated in item 6(f):
Stratified Report Invoicing: For agencies participating in Stratified Report Invoicing, a caret (^) followed by a valid two-digit charge code must be placed at the beginning of the series description.
Site Audit Records: State "GAO Site Audit" if the records have been so designated by the Government Accountability Office, and indicate whether the site audit records pertain to Native Americans
Non-paper-based and special format records: These can include records such as microfilm, engineering drawings (because of their special format), electronic media, etc. Include the format type in 6(f) (see www.archives.gov/frc/codes.html for information on specific codes for non-textual record types). 
Item 6(g): Restrictions
If your records pertain to National Security Information, you must complete this section using one of the three National Security Classification codes (C=Confidential, S=Secret or T=Top Secret). Please note that the codes Q, R, or W (listed on the back of the SF 135) should no longer be used. If you designate a National Security Classification, you MUST also indicate whether the records are designated as Code E (Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted Data). For further information, please see EO 12356  (http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12356.html), later amended by EO 13292. Only the Washington National Records Center at Suitland can store classified records.
If there are no special restrictions on your records, you may designate code N or leave this section blank. In this case the default restriction (restricted to authorized agency users and researchers) will apply.
Cite the appropriate schedule identifier and item number in your agency records schedule or the General Records Schedule (GRS). For accountable officers' records, cite the appropriate item from GRS 6. You may also use the General Records Schedules (36 CFR 1228.40-46) when dealing with records common to most offices such as contracts, travel and transportation records, and similar records. If you need further assistance, contact your agency's records officer. Also indicate in this section if the records are subject to extended retention, commonly known as a "freeze" on destruction. The "freeze code" is a three-letter designation created by FRC staff to identify the freeze pertinent to the records. 
Item 6(i): Follow the instructions on your Item 6(i): Follow the instructions on your records schedule to compute the disposition date. Because disposal is accomplished in quarterly cycles (i.e., January, April, July, and October), advance the date to the beginning of the next calendar quarter to obtain the actual date of disposal. For example, if the ending date of your records is September 2006, and the retention period is three years, then the disposal date will be October 2009. Permanent records are offered to the National Archives on an annual basis; no month is shown in the disposition date field. Place "P" after the offer year. If records are unscheduled, please indicate "U" in this section.
Item 6(i), 6(k), 6(l), and 6(m) are completed by FRC personnel.
Stratified Report Invoicing refers to billing that is broken out by different functions and/or geographical locations within the same agency. If you are unsure whether your agency participates in Stratified Report Invoicing, contact your agency's records officer, or your NARA FRC account representative (www.archives.gov/frc/acct-reps.html).
SUBMITTING THE SF 135

Agencies may transmit the SF 135 to FRCs either in hard copy or electronically. Submitting the form electronically reduces mail time, is more secure, and allows revisions to be made in a timely manner. You may obtain an electronic version of the 
SF 135 online in Word or PDF format.
Before shipping records, you must send a completed SF 135 to your local FRC and receive approval of the form from the center. The "transfers" e-mail address for each FRC is available on the FRC Directors page (www.archives.gov/frc/directors.html). A separate SF 135 is required for each individual record series having the same disposition authority and disposition date. For instructions on completing the SF 135, please see page 2 of the SF 135.
Each individual record series being transferred requires a separate SF 135. See 36 CFR 1228.160 (e) for more details.
Approval of the Standard Form 135 Sean Preparation
for Transfer
After you submit the SF 135, the FRC staff will review it to ensure that it is complete and accurate. FRC staff will then assign the transfer number and will return one copy of the SF 135 to you within 10 working days, authorizing shipment of the boxes. You must include a copy of the approved SF 135 in box #1 of each transfer. If you submitted a SF 135 electronically, print out the approved copy of the SF 135 that was e-mailed back to you by the FRC and place it in the first box as the "shipment" copy. If the boxes or other containers are sealed and must not be opened by NARA staff, place this shipment copy in an envelope securely taped to the outside of box #1.
Always retain a copy of the detailed box content listing so that you may provide agency box numbers when requesting reference service. We also strongly recommend that you include a copy of the box content listing in box #1.
FRC staff can prepare detailed folder indexing for your transfers on a fee for- service basis. Please see the "Special Services" chapter for more details.
After the FRC staff shelve the records, they will issue a records center location number and will return a completed, signed copy of the SF 135 to you as an official receipt. FRC staff will add the location of the records to the receipt copy of the SF 135. Your agency staff will use this location information when requesting records. This receipt copy is your official record of the transfer and should be retained in your files.
Freeze--In records disposition, those temporary records that cannot be destroyed on schedule because of special circumstances, such as a court order or investigation, require a temporary extension of the approved retention period.
Unscheduled records are Federal records whose final disposition has not been approved by NARA in a records schedule.
An active record is a record necessary to conduct the current business of an office.

Transfers typically contain one series--the records all have one subject, function, or activity in common.

Mixed series are records grouped together into a transfer that do not have any relationship with each other, aside from being from the same agency or office. Mixed-series records may have different disposition authorities but must have the same disposition date.

Permanent records are records that warrant preservation by the Federal Government beyond the time they are needed for administrative, fiscal, or legal purposes because of their historical or other value. The National Archives makes the final determination on permanent records (see 44 USC 29).
Items to be Completed by Records Center:
NOTE: You must have a full version of Adobe Acrobat in order to save the annotations made to this electronic form.