LBJ: MASTER OF DECEIT
A Review of an Incredible Book:
“The Inheritance”
THE INHERITANCE – POISONED FRUIT OF JFK’S
ASSASSINATION – HOW ONE MAN’S CUSTODY OF BOBBY KENNEDY’S HIDDEN EVIDENCE
CHANGED OUR PAST AND CONTINUES TO SHAPE OUR FUTURE. (TRINEDAY,
WALTERVILLE, OREGON, NOV. 22, 2018, BY CHRISTOPHER AND MICHELLE FULTON;
INTRODUCTION BY DICK RUSSELL).
This book is taking the “JFK Assassination Research
Community” (if one can seriously refer to it as such) by storm. Like men
scurrying around a ship in distress looking frantically for safe harbor – in
this case, words that will sustain the test of time – many old-time researchers
are scrambling with the dilemma presented to an established institution by a
“newbie” who has burst onto the scene with what appears, at least to some of
them, to be a veritable solution to a fifty-five-year-old puzzle: “Who really
killed JFK?”
For the naysayers, the vetting of Christopher and
Michelle Fulton’s story is so conflicted that even the 120 pages of photos and
documents, and as importantly, the numerous citations to sworn affidavits of
key witnesses contained within the narrative (including many verbatim copies of
other original materials) do not seem to mitigate the shock of those whose
contrary opinions have been entrenched for many decades.
But more about that aspect of the “Crime of the
Century” later.
* * *
Christopher Fulton’s life was forever altered when
he acquired, in 1995, a gold Cartier watch that was worn by JFK on the last day
of his own life.
Little did he know that the watch had once been
covered by the slain president’s blood and brain matter, nor that the finely
shattered lines – Fulton called them “striations” – on the crystal, were caused
by a shock wave impacting it from the fatal shot to JFK’s head. That occurred
just as he held his hands toward his neck, instinctively reacting to an earlier
shot to his throat, and those striations would collect not only JFK’s
bodily tissues, but traces of the mercury that had been infused into the bullet
to ensure his death (p. 119).
What Fulton would find out later, from Robert
Bouck – who, in 1963, had been in charge of the Secret Service’s
Protective Research Section – revealed that Robert F. Kennedy had
obtained absolute proof of a conspiracy with a number of shooters and many more
shots than the official reports had stated. But that information would
only come to him years later, though its provenance was a forensics examination
done in the mid-1960s that RFK had obtained from a private entity, done
specifically to keep it away from the FBI and Secret Service laboratories,
where Kennedy knew it would never be properly analyzed.
When he had originally purchased the watch, Fulton
had no reason to believe that it was material evidence directly related to the
murder of President Kennedy that would have absolutely proved the existence of
a conspiracy, had there ever been an honest investigation of the crime.
Nor did Fulton realize, until much later, that it was Robert Kennedy who had
discovered that truth and had taken steps to preserve it, and other such
incriminating evidence, out of the reach of either the government – or, to
ensure their safety, his own family – when he entrusted much of it to JFK’s
secretary Evelyn Lincoln for safe-keeping. Likewise, Fulton later discovered
that Robert Kennedy had also taken precautionary steps to ensure that other
evidence, proving the truths of his brother’s murder, would be kept safe for
discovery by future generations; he did that by burying them with JFK’s casket
when it was reinterred on March 14, 1967 at Arlington National Cemetery.
These items included photographs of the watch, the original watch strap, the
president’s brain, blood reports, and copies of the x-rays and autopsy photos.
Robert Kennedy probably selected Mrs. Lincoln’s
assistance because of his knowledge that she had already acquired, on the day
after the assassination, many other mementos of JFK and her time working in the
Oval Office (undoubtedly made more numerous due to her anger with Lyndon
Johnson, who had demanded that she complete the task of removing JFK’s property
in less than one hour; her complaint to RFK about it succeeded in extending the
deadline another two hours.[1] Johnson then claimed in his memoirs that
he didn’t take over the office until three days later [forcing his future
biographer Robert Caro to go along with it] among the many other lies contained
within Johnson’s tome).
Fulton had walked innocently into the middle of the
morass when he bought the watch from the man to whom Mrs. Lincoln had gifted it
in her will, Robert L. White of Catonsville, Maryland, a collector of
presidential memorabilia, after she had become friends with him through years
of correspondence and visits; two years after she died, once the government
discovered the existence of the hidden secrets, Fulton would begin experiencing
a decade-long, nearly unbelievable, gestapo-like government-induced torture
program including visits to some of the worst prisons in the country that
almost defies description. But Fulton attempted to do just that by
devoting nearly half of the book’s narrative to his personal long-term
nightmare that essentially destroyed his previous life, as well as his wife’s
and his mother’s, even the lives of his four rescue dogs. In all of their
cases: Literally, destroyed.
In Fulton’s writing about such painful memories, he
has laid bare the awful truth of the lengths to which the government will go to
protect the original lies – now devolved into apparently permanent myths – that
were meant to portray its own innocence as the original plotters cunningly
replaced their own blame for the assassination of the 35th president onto
a “lone nut” simpleton / malcontent.
The “lone nut malcontent” façade became another
pattern to be twice repeated five years later with similar other “misfits”
blamed for the murders of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy.
Both of them had already become national heroes yet their public popularity had
caused them to become feared by the plotters as being potential threats to the
existence of those same myths that protected the truths from being exposed.
Mr. Fulton’s travails exposed still another
long-buried, very plausible explanation for how and why JFK’s son – John F.
Kennedy, Jr. – died.
In early 1998, Fulton met with JFK Jr. in Florida
and subsequently sold the watch to him, suddenly shifting the object of the
government’s wrath with it, from one man to another, yet not releasing its grip
on the first of them. Shortly after their meeting, JFK Jr. made the
mistake of writing to President Clinton to suggest a proper forensic autopsy of
his father, to establish “the truths behind my father’s murder being released
to the public.” Those two events led to a series of others, not the least
of which was Fulton’s indictment in February, 1998 and his arrest on August 9,
1998, then the beginning of his torture and the loss of his freedom until
finally being released in February, 2007.
For JFK Jr., it appears that the interview he
conducted with Christopher Fulton at the hotel in Florida was part of his
larger plan for a major expose’ in his magazine George,but, as he
cautioned Fulton, “I want to keep this under wraps until late next year.” (p.
181). Unfortunately for him, Mr. Kennedy would not live that long.
He would die in a mysterious airplane crash on July 16, 1999. There has
been a plethora of news articles written since then which suggest still another
cover-up has been in place for two decades and counting. One such document is
headlined: “HARD EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY, COVER-UP IN JFK Jr. DEATH” and
includes the following sentences in its eleven (11) pages: [2]
JFK Jr.’s 9:39 PM radio contact was without doubt
DELIBERATELY and literally “covered up”: hours of time on the tape archive of
WCVB’s July 17 broadcast, during which information on Kennedy’s radio contact
was continually reported have been intentionally cut. The record has in fact
been FALSIFIED.
FAA Flight Specialist Edward Meyer of LaGuardia
Airport in Queens N.Y., . . . stated in the report that visibility in the
region was AT LEAST very good on the evening of July 16. Meyer himself became
SO distressed by endless spewing of erroneous disinformation about these
weather conditions by government agencies and mass media, he took the
unprecedented step of issuing a public statement ON HIS OWN–which THOROUGHLY
SLAMMED this onslaught of disinformational noise as complete, total NONSENSE. .
. . To quote from Meyer’s personal statement as released to mass media: “The
weather along his flight was just fine. A little haze over eastern
Connecticut.”
* * *
There have been many other “dots connected” within
the Fultons’ book which will be discovered by the careful reader. Ergo,
we need not tabulate all of them within this paper, however a hint at some of
them may be intuited from some of the following material as we return to the
issues raised in the opening paragraphs. They relate to the paradox of
how some of the most “experienced” researchers have not fully embraced the
revelations contained within this extraordinary personal account, and how
Christopher Fulton’s original desire to own a key piece of history, JFK’s
watch, turned his world upside-down.
The Fultons stipulated on the copyright page:
This is a memoir; it is sourced from my memories,
letters, and recollections. Dialogue is reconstructed, and some names and
identifying features have been changed to provide anonymity. There is some
informed, educated supposition about how actions affected historical event and
meetings. The underlying story is based on actual happenings and
historical personages.
These literary devices have been used by many
authors of personal-witness books in the past as a means to attract a wider
readership for their works. Authors writing to an audience more concerned
with readability than technical detail have found that people are generally
attracted to those works that utilize the novelist’s artful lilt over the scholarly
technical mechanics of a research historian.[3] Such authors face the
essential handicap of being in a position of creating a new historical record
where none previously existed, therefore normal citations to previous works
cannot be reduced to footnoted references to those other sources; they must, of
necessity, describe the pertinent facts within the narrative itself.
Which is precisely what the Fultons have done; their
book includes numerous verbatim copies of correspondence, photos and legal documents.
Finally, it should be understood that stylistic writing points do not, of
themselves, have any pertinence to the intrinsic accuracy of a book. For
example, the famed biographer of LBJ, the aforementioned Robert Caro, has
studiously appended his books with very lengthy endnotes and chapter summaries
which, to the average reader, suggests that the heavy documentation proves its
veracity. That is, unless they take note that he has omitted numerous
issues and/or persons which/whom do not comport with his narrative:
As one illustration of the point, among many, the
names and related stories of men closely associated with Johnson’s darker side,
including his aide/hitman Malcolm Wallace or Billie Sol Estes (whose name
appeared in practically every newspaper in the country, multiple times, during
1962 specifically because of his association with Johnson), and the names and
mysterious deaths of five of Estes’ associates during the previous year could
thus be ignored as well. Even his long-time aide / appointee as U.S. Attorney
in the Northern Texas District, H. Barefoot Sanders, who showed up in the
Western District, outside his normal jurisdiction, just in time to take control
of the tainted 1962 grand jury to ensure that Henry Marshall’s death certificate
would not be changed from the ludicrous “suicide”, at least for another
twenty-two (22) years – eleven years after Johnson died and was thus safely
“out of reach” of the law. None of those names appear in any of Caro’s
four tomes.
Contrast that elegant subterfuge by Caro with the
works of famed “Gonzo Journalist” Hunter S. Thompson, whose essays contain some
of the most profound truths ever written, yet seldom did he use conventional
“literary rules” to accomplish that. For example, on the very day of JFK’s
assassination, he wrote a lengthy letter to a friend that included these
excerpts, which belie his immediate knowledge that this was no act of a “lone
nut”:[4]
“No matter what, today is the end of an era.
No more fair play . . .”
“This is the end of reason, the dirtiest hour of our
time”,
“Politics will become a cockfight and reason will go
by the boards,”
“We now enter the era of the shitrain, President
Johnson and the hardening of the arteries”,
“My concept of the new novel would have fit this
situation, but now I see no hope for getting it done, if indeed, any publishing
houses survive the Nazi’s scramble that is sure to come.” (Emphasis
added, due to the profound truths he immediately predicted).
That document also contained the first use of his
“patented” term Fear and Loathingalong with those predictions of what
suddenly appeared on the horizon, the truths of which are still being
witnessed.
The Fultons’ choice of mixing “informed, educated
supposition” to explain otherwise sketchy and fragmented events and known, but
undocumented, meetings between conflicted principals and related matters –
together with numerous hard-copy memoranda, legal documents and other artifacts
– should serve them well in delivering essential truths to a larger audience
than that which might have been, had certain critics made the decision for
them.
* * *
Against that backdrop, long-time JFK researcher Bill
Kelly recently wrote a review of the book in which he objected to the use of
the literary devices the Fultons used: [5]
[The book was] “written in a novelized fashion so
while it’s an easy read, the contrived conversations and fictionalized style
takes away from the seriousness of the story and detracts from the basic facts
that should be of concern to all JFK journalists and historians . . . Instead
of novelizing this story, Fulton should have written this book with Dick
Russell as a true to life non-fictional account, and it would have served us
all much better.
What Mr. Fulton had called “reconstructed” dialog
(meaning using his original notes and memories, he paraphrased actual conversations)
Mr. Kelly has ridiculed as being “contrived,” as if his long conversation with
Robert Bouck, one which Christopher remembered so vividly, never
occurred. Having nothing to back up his rejection, Kelly forces the
reader to decide who is the more credible, a very risky act when asking the
reader to decide “who has the bigger biases.”
Kelly then lamented the fact that Evelyn Lincoln had
willed the property entrusted to her by RFK to a noted collector of JFK
memorabilia, Robert L. White, whose notability was well established in the
Baltimore-Washington area (to which I can personally attest, having seen
numerous articles about him in the local press when I lived in Catonsville and
worked in downtown Baltimore in the 1970-90s). Kelly wrote, “… instead of doing the right thing, and
turn over what she had to the Kennedy family before she died, Mrs. Lincoln
willed the whole treasure trove to a total stranger, the unassuming and typical
American Robert White.” (Emphasis added).
[BK NOTES: White was a blue collar worker from Baltimore who wrote to Mrs. Lincoln for JFK's autograph - that's how they met. He was a total nobody, and Mrs. Lincoln willed him the Oval Office memorabilia that rightly belonged to the Kennedy family when she was not invited to Caroline's wedding because she hoarded the family's personal items that truly belonged to the family, not a total stranger like White. And we only know about the watch and other items because White tried to auction them off.]
In making this rather haughty declaration about Mrs.
Lincoln’s not having done the “right thing,” Kelly indirectly denigrates Robert
Kennedy’s provable personal decision to rely on her to protect his family, not
to mention the historic truths of his brother’s murder. He also neglected
to reference the late Mrs. Lincoln’s specific written instruction furnished by
RFK’s former secretary, Angela Novello, to the probate judge explaining that
the purpose behind honoring RFK’s wishes was to “ensure the safety of the
remaining Kennedy family;” furthermore, Mrs. Lincoln’s note continued, to
ensure that the property “shall not fall under the control of the CIA, the FBI,
the NSA, the Pentagon, the National Archives and Records Administration, the
John F. Kennedy Library, the White House, or any other branch of government or
agency” (pp. 9-10).
Had he reflected on it a little more, perhaps Mr. Kelly
might have realized that, in denigrating Mrs. Lincoln, he implicitly did the
same thing to Ms. Novello, both of whom had merely served RFK’s wishes; did he
mean to denigrate him too?
[BK NOTES: Mrs. Lincoln did not serve RFK's wishes after 1968 when he was killed.]
As Robert Bouck, the Secret Service officer
who had become a trusted friend and admirer of Robert Kennedy, told Fulton (p.
129):
“Without Evelyn Lincoln and Angela Novello, the
little remaining assassination evidence, that the government was so determined
to gather up and cover up, would have disappeared, or been doctored or lost
forever. Believe me, this country owes those women a great debt.
When the truth about John F. Kennedy’s assassination is revealed, it will be
because of their faithful dedication.”
What would motivate Robert F. Kennedy to take such
profoundly unconventional actions to ensure that the secrets he had discovered
“behind the scenes” would either be buried with JFK’s casket in the 1967
reinternment or gifted by him personally to Mrs. Lincoln for safekeeping for
the rest of her life, then entrusting her to find a new, privately run entity
to preserve it into the unknown future? It is instructive to re-read the
last paragraph with the names of the various federal agencies to which the
property would never be given for an idea about how emphatic he must have been
to her when he gave her that instruction. It was those agencies
collectively (excepting the NARA and JFK Library, that he knew would always be
subject to the orders and whims of the others noted) which RFK had come to
realize had something to do with his brother’s murder.
Moreover, the book contains several descriptions of
the reasons for Robert Kennedy’s concerns that this property be kept from the
federal bureaucracy, knowing that if it were ever to fall into those hands it
would be lost forever. It becomes crystal clear that he intended to become
president and only then would he be in a position to expose the complete truth
of JFK’s assassination. That story starts on pages 117-122, within
Chapter 16, “The Secrets Man.”[6]
It is the story of how Christopher
Fulton met the aforementioned Robert Bouck, and how Bouck had patiently waited
for someone, preferably from the Kennedy family, to come to him so that he
could personally explain the complete story.
When Mr. Bouck finally received a call from
Christopher in July, 1997, he inferred that Fulton was somehow acting at the
behest of John F. Kennedy Jr., though that was never actually discussed. Bouck
agreed to meet Fulton and a few weeks later they spent the better part of an
unusually cool and rainy August day walking around Arlington National Cemetery
under umbrellas. Christopher’s bona-fides were established when he showed
Bouck the watch and the copies of Mrs. Lincoln’s letter and Bouck’s own original
affidavit. His confidence in Fulton now firmly established, Bouck did most of
the talking, covering even the most minute details of a story that he had
learned directly from RFK, including this admonition:
“Robert said if anything happened to him during his
bid for the presidency, everything he had collected should remain secret and
silent in Evelyn’s keeping for the rest of her life, for the safety of the
Kennedy family. That pledge of silence was Robert’s last request of her, and
she kept it. It must have been an incredible burden to carry her whole
life. She held true for all those years; she was so fiercely loyal.”[7]
While Bill Kelly is certainly a man of notable
accomplishments, including decades of serious research on peripheral related
matters, his comments here reveal a man who evidently missed a number of the
most salient points presented within the pages of the Fultons’ book.
[BK NOTES: The most salient points are not even in Fulton's book. Fulton is a fraud and what he doesn't tell you about himself is the most salient. Stay tuned to JFKCountercoup for the deatils.]
The
ones identified above may be the most mundane of them, considering what
follows.
Mr. Kelly then attempted to minimize the credibility
of Bouck as well as the veracity of his account, describing him – as if he knew
him personally – as “a very discrete person, not someone who would spill his
guts to a total stranger like Fulton, even if he did have JFK’s watch.”
[8]
[BK NOTES: Read Bouck's WC testimony to get an idea of his personality.]
He didn’t note that Mr. Bouck was one of the few Secret Service
officials who actually admired the Kennedys, had become very close to RFK after
his brother’s murder, and that he was quoted in the narrative as saying
(paraphrased by Christopher Fulton):
“What I’m about to share with you I’ve never shared
with anyone, not even my own family. The last time I spoke about any of
this was to Robert Kennedy. You see, Christopher, I made Robert a promise
to stand with him until he could reach the White House, take power, and give it
back to the people. He intended to set the record straight. He would have told
the world there was a conspiracy to force his brother into a corner, and there
was a coup that stole the power in this country. Robert Kennedy was the only
man who could have disclosed that, but they got to him first.”[9]
It was quite easy for Kelly to dismiss Bouck after
declaring that the book’s literary style was inauthentic, as when he stated:
“Fulton’s long and convoluted conversation with
former Secret Service Agent Robert Bouck at JFK’s graveside is total BS . . .
Nor do I believe, as Fulton attests, that LBJ had his Secret Service agents
take JFK’s St. Christopher and Miraculous medals so they wouldn’t stop the
bullets that he knew would be coming at him later that day. That’s BS. JFK
accidentally left his medals in his Fort Worth hotel shower and they were
retrieved by a Secret Service agent.”[10]
Here Mr. Kelly summarily – the term “willy-nilly”
may apply here – tosses out key evidentiary points that Fulton obtained
directly from the retired Secret Service official who had plaintively come
forward to reveal secret truths that he had lived with for over four
decades. For some reason, Kelly noted only the medals, but those items
also included a St. Christopher money clip he carried in his wallet (tucked
into his breast pocket, close to his heart), his cufflinks, tie-clip and his
watch, all taken under the pretext of having them checked for radiation, a
practice only done in Washington; there was never a real intent to do that in
Fort Worth.
As long-time researcher Edgar Tatro pointed out upon
reading Kelly’s blog:
“Are we to believe that JFK “accidentally” left all
of those items, even his wallet, in the bathroom that morning, according to
Kelly’s thesis?”
[BK NOTES: Yes, Ed. The St. Christopher clip and Miraculous medals were found in JFK's shower where he accidentally left them. The idea that the SS kept the medals from him so they would not deflect bullets is absurd.]
Maybe the real reason for the “BS” assertion was
because of the statement attributed to the highly knowledgeable Mr. Bouck, a
friend of RFK who had pledged himself to remain true to him: “Those agents’
orders came directly from Johnson”?[11]
[BK NOTES: Read Bouck's Warren Commission testimony in which he mentions a WC document that is a report on the threats from Texas made against JFK - dozens of them, when Bouck's Protective Research Section told the agents leaving on the Texas trip that there were none.]
The ease with which Kelly dismisses all of these
statements with a “BS” declaration is astonishing, given that Fulton did not
just dream up this very lengthy and detailed discourse. Clearly, he did not
think Fulton properly documented the long conversation conducted during their
walk around the massive cemetery in Arlington, Virginia. Did he expect Fulton
to document it with a portable tape recorder, equipped with dual wired mics, to
get verbatim quotes from Bouck, carrying it in his free hand as they strolled
around the huge, hilly cemetery in the rain, while holding his umbrella in the
other? Of course, such a recording would have had to be transcribed (by a
court reporter?), its accuracy legally authenticated, apparently, for even that
to be acceptable.
Why can’t Kelly simply accept the far more
reasonable premise, that Fulton would have written out contemporaneous notes
afterward to jog his memory later?
[BK NOTES: If Fulton kept contemporary notes he would have written so and printed examples in the back of his book, where he prints redacted documents - redacted to hide the names of those who can confirm or refute his story.]
If not, then what about the notarized
affidavit? He didn’t mention that, at the end of Chapter 16, where the
bulk of Bouck’s discussion appears, Fulton even states that when they returned
to the car after their long walk around the Arlington National Cemetery, Mr.
Bouck reached into the trunk and pulled out a manila envelope, saying,“This is my notarized and signed affidavit.”
And further, “It details everything we discussed today. I’m glad I was able to
pass it on in person and talk about it while I’m still here; it’s weighed on my
mind for so many years. I’m keeping the receipt that Robert Kennedy gave me for
the watch . . . if John Jr. needs it for any reason, have him contact me.”[12]
Furthermore, regarding the key piece of evidence
presented within the book, Kelly has this to say:
“Fulton says that because the watch was only inches
from his head when he was shot there, traces of the mercury coated bullet that
exploded JFK’s head could be found on the watch, proof of conspiracy. I don’t
buy that either. I just don’t get it. How is the watch is [sic] proof or
evidence of conspiracy?[13]
The obvious answer to the question is, “It’s
the mercury!” Fulton had been told by Bouck that the mercury was
consistent with top-grade U.S. military munitions, and that “the x-rays showed
fuzzy grey-clouded areas that were not caused by the minute bullet fragments,
but rather by mercury dispersion.” There was never any evidence presented that
any of Oswald’s alleged bullets contained mercury[14], so if in fact traces of
it were discovered on the watch, then there was at least one more shooter . . .
Can you say “BINGO”?
[BK NOTES: Bouck did not tell Fulton any such thing. In fact these watches contained mercury and the bullet that blew out JFK's brain need not have to contain mercury to kill him or prove conspiracy.]
All in all, Mr. Kelly’s blog post in this case
suggests that he has gone out of his way to posit a very weak and perfunctory
critique of what most objective researchers believe to be a truthful
and well documented first-hand witness account.
[BK NOTES: What objective researchers will believe Fulton when they find out who he really is - a fellon convicted of bank fraud? This is not a well documented first-hand witness account, and Fulton did not serve a lengthly time as he asserts, but three years. This is not a memoir, it is a continuation of his bank fraud conviction.]
His reaction to Mr.
Fulton’s lengthy descriptions, in painfully agonizing detail, of the incredibly
inhumane treatment he received from the time of his indictment in February,
1998 to his conviction (coerced plea deal) in August of that year, then eight
and one-half years spent under the most horrid circumstances in a series of
federal prisons (many of the “maximum security” type) was particularly bizarre,
given that the very first words, put into the copyright page at the front of
the book, were “This is a memoir.”
Yet Kelly aloofly asserted:
“Much of the book is about Fulton’s jail time and
the characters he met there, totally unrelated to the assassination story.”[15]
In a very narrow “tunnel vision” sense, that is a
correct statement.
[BK NOTES: Christopher Fulton never served eight years in federal prison as he falsely asserts. He spent three years in prison under the name Jon Dallas Holden, having changed his name. Why doesn't he tell us the names of the other prisoners he says he met - the Catholic priest, the Philly mobster? And why does he redact the name of White's Atlantic City lawyer who informed Fulton that White was breaking their book deal with him? Is that my "tunnel vision" or Fulton's?]
However, when considered in the context that Fulton’s
memoir is placed, it is really elementally critical to his story. It is
about the extremely long tentacles still in use by the government to protect
secrets related to the truths about JFK’s assassination. Let’s suppose
for a minute that the assassination had never happened and that someone simply
swiped JFK’s watch from the eponymously-named Boston library where many of his
personal effects are ensconced. Would the government have gone to such
extremes to recover the same property? Given the amount of effort
expended by the government to protect the secrets, even now (the ones that were
supposed to be released fourteen months ago, for example) it should be no
surprise to anyone that the “Cover-up Continuum” has already proven to be not
only continuous, but fierce, brutal and probably endless.
* * *
Another item from a posting by Larry P. Schnapf, a
board member of CAPA (Citizens Against Political Assassinations), on the Amazon
page for The Inheritance seemingly begs for a response, given that no
one has given him such a response to date on that website:
“somebody who read this book tell me one iota,
a single new revelation in these documents that were supposedly so important
that RFK hid them that provides evidence of a second gunman. nothing, nada,
zippo so far. it just seems to be story about Fulton’s journey along with some
JFK trickets [sic] and personal correspondence.”
Regarding that request for “one iota, a single
new revelation in these documents” — what about these gems?:
Most obviously, to anyone who has even read a few of
the reviews already published, the most notable item, the subject of the book
and the reason for the government’s wrath against author Fulton, was addressed
above in response to Bill Kelly’s confusion.
[BK NOTES: The government's wrath against author Fulton was not because he inherited Mrs. Lincoln's memorabilia, or the watch or anything. Fulton, as the evidence will show shortly, was convicted of a felony bank fraud under an assumed name, the name he served time in prison Jon Dallas Holton. Christopher Scott Fulton never served time in federal prison under that name.]
It was the revelation that the
Cartier watch worn by JFK when he was shot had been recovered outside normal
channels and was eventually given by Secret Service official Robert Bouck to
Robert F. Kennedy, who had it forensically tested, which established that it
had been contaminated not only with JFK’s biological tissues and his blood, but
the mercury encased into a bullet that was not consistent with other bullets
allegedly (but not really) fired by Lee H. Oswald. It is an elementary
exercise to deduce that this is startling new evidence never dreamed of before
this book was published, that it came from an entirely new source accompanied
by much documentation.
{BK NOTES: I am not confused. This is not a startling revelation. The true fact is that these watches have mercury in them and if it tested positive for mercury that is not proof of anything, let alone that the bullet that blew out JFK's head was laced with mercury - that's total BS.]
But beyond that essential piece, there were more
newly harvested documents brought forth in this book, including but not limited
to the following:
What about the numerous sworn affidavits and
verbatim letters, not the least of which was Evelyn Lincoln’s letter of 6/5/92
printed on pp. 81-82, which stated in part “on Nov. 20, 1963 my husband Harold
Lincoln overheard a conversation . . . Secret Service agents in in V.P.
Johnson’s detail were discussing Pres. Kennedy being shot at in Dallas”?
How about the “revelation” that answers the
long-term mystery of what happened to JFK’s brain (what was left of it) on p.
83: Ms. Lincoln explained how it was one of several items that were
placed in his new gravesite on 3/14/67?
Or the audio tapes described, of JFK’s conversations
with McCone and Taylor about getting out of Vietnam, and how he planned to
prepare for RFK to “continue” the changes he planned in his next term, and the
litany of other planned programs listed on p. 89?
[BK NOTES: All I wanted to know - my only question to Fulton was what became of these tapes? I offered to make transcripts of all of them - which alone would be a fantastic book - but Fulton won't respond to my questions. He was interviewed on video tape by Judyth Vary Baker, which might be more revealing.]
Still another assertion — made by ex-Secret Service
SAIC – PRS Robert I. Bouck, one of the few who admired JFK — that Dallas mayor
Earle Cabell and sheriff Bill Decker were CIA operatives (now proven in
Cabell’s case by recently released government documents) who purposely told
police and sheriff’s deputies to “stand down,” while a similar order was
repeated to key Secret Service agents on detail as well, to facilitate a “false
flag assassination attempt”. Asked who turned it from a “false
flag/simulated attempt” to a “real assassination,” agent Bouck stated “Lyndon
Johnson” (pp. 102-103)
* * *
The recurrent meme laid out in the book, that Lyndon
Johnson was behind it – implicitly as the single, key man who led all the
others – is obviously the real reason for the desperate attempts by some people
who claim to be “truth-seekers” to deprecate this ground-breaking book.
It is apparently a “truth” that they cannot accept, as though the rejection
of the very premise was always a given (that is, it is not something new, and
has been in place for many years), thus it can be construed to represent an
intrinsic, long-term, unending objective.
[BK NOTES: LBJ wasn't capable of pulling off the Dealey Plaza operation, that included the psychwar deception to blame the conspiracy on Fidel Castro, an active measure that continues today. That part of the plan was REJECTED by LBJ and the Lone Nut scenario was accepted instead. LBJ didn't plan an operation in which he rejected the cover-story. If you are truly interested in the TRUTH - and say that Chris Fulton is - then why is he lying about the death of his mother while he was in prison, when she was in court with him over a second controversial watch sale years later? And why would Fulton redact his middle name? Because Christopher Scott Futon, as the Washington Post reported - is a convicted bank fraud fellon. He obtained the money he gave to White for the watch through bank fraud. And that's the truth that Fulton won't tell you.]
These early reactions from these two board members of
CAPA suggest that they have concerns about how the public might react to this
news regarding the 36th President, his political party, and the “Deep State”
behind it. Moreover, it appears that those concerns are so great that
they evidently outweigh the catastrophic, permanent and continuing damage done
through the coup d’état exacted upon the country on November 22, 1963.
And that fear might further explain the real reason that the “Crime of
the Century” has remained unsolved for fifty-five years.
[BK NOTES: CAPA is exposing the coup in detail - and LBJ did not engineer it or have anything to do with it, as will be demonstrated. See: http://CAPA-US.org ]
Could it be that Lyndon B. Johnson himself had
planned for that very paradigm to protect himself, and his “legacy,” forever?
No comments:
Post a Comment