A Cautionary Tale About Why Congressional Oversight Is
Needed
• In
January of 1995, the U.
S. Secret
Service destroyed two boxes of JFK
assassination
records willfully, in violation of the law (specifically, in violation
of the
JFK
Records Act). The records had been labeled for permanent retention, and the
National
Archives staff had briefed the Secret Service (and all other key Executive
Branch
agencies) after passage of the JFK Records Act that no records were to be
destroyed.
• The
records destroyed were protective survey reports on visits
President Kennedy
made, or
planned to make, to twenty-three (23) different locations between September 24, 1963 to November 8, 1963 ,
inclusive—as well as the normal protective procedures
employed
whenever President Kennedy visited 19 various locations throughout
• Among
the records destroyed were three folders pertaining to President Kennedy’s
cancelled
trip to Chicago , which
was to have taken place on November
2, 1963 —but
which was apparently
cancelled at the last minute due to an assassination attempt.
(See JFK
and the Unspeakable, by Jim Douglass, for details.)
• The
Secret Service withheld the fact that the records had actually been destroyed
for
about six
months; instead, in response to repeated requests for the records from the
ARRB
staff, they dissembled and told the ARRB staff that the records “could not be
located.”
Only when the Secret Service realized that the Review Board was not going to
stop
asking for the records, did it admit that the records had been destroyed.
•
Initially, there was great rage and consternation within the Review Board about
the
destruction
of these potentially vital records. That action ran contrary to the very
purposes
of the JFK Records Act, which was to make all assassination records possible
available
for direct inspection by the American people, and thereby not only help us
understand
our own history better, but increase trust in government.
• The
Review Board and the Senior Staff of the ARRB considered holding public
hearings to castigate and censure the Secret Service officials responsible, but
after an unusually frank and tense exchange of correspondence between the ARRB
and the Secret Service, nothing happened. Private
meetings were held between senior officials on both sides, but no public
hearings were held; no one was admonished or punished; and the problem was
barely acknowledged—indeed, was under-reported—in the ARRB’s Final Report. (See
Volume V of Inside the Assassination Records
Review Board, by Douglas Horne, pp. 1451-1458, for more details about this
incident.)
Prepared by: Douglas P. Horne, Former Chief Analyst for Military
Records, ARRB
One More Reason to Have JFK Oversight Hearings
• Section
6103 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits Federal government agencies that
possess
tax return information from disclosing that information. Prior to passage of
the JFK Records Act, the IRS requested that the JFK Act
“trump” current Federal law
concerning
tax return information, and allow the IRS to release tax
return records
relating
to the assassination of President Kennedy. Congress took a cautious
approach to
this
matter, and refused.
• The ARRB
correctly identified tax return information (namely, both tax returns and
earnings records) for several individuals and business entities as
“assassination records.” These include records of the Warren Commission and the
House Select Committee on
Assassinations,
as well as ARRB staff analytical memos pertaining to earnings information regarding
several key individuals.
• The key
information in these records about tax returns and earnings is redacted,
and
can never be released unless or until section 6103 of the IRS Code is amended
to allow such release. Even when all other ARRB redactions are automatically
released in 2017, the redactions pertaining to tax return information will
not be lifted, unless Congress amends the
IRS Code to allow such release.
• The
redacted records include tax return and earnings and employment information
about Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby (AKA Rubenstein), Marina Oswald, Marguerite
Oswald, Nelson Bunker Hunt, Eugene Hale Brading (AKA Jack Braden), Palmer
McBride; and employment information currently in the JFK Records Collection on
any and all employees of business establishments who worked where Lee Harvey
Oswald was employed at the times Oswald was at those establishments. These
records are all in the collection already, and represent a finite universe that the Review Board
determined was relevant to the assassination. The redactions simply need to be
removed.
• The
importance of much of this information relates directly to the question of
whether or not Oswald may have been an asset of U.S. intelligence at the time
of his defection to the USSR; to allegations that his identity was assumed by
others; and to his true employment status immediately prior to the
assassination.
• In its
Final Report, the Review Board recommended (on page 75) that the IRS Code be
amended to
allow full release of these redacted assassination records, as follows: “Thus,
the Review Board recommends that Congress enact legislation exempting Lee
Harvey Oswald’s tax return information, Oswald’s employment information
obtained by the Social Security Administration, and other tax or IRS related
information in the files of the Warren Commission and the HSCA from the
protection afforded it by section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, and that
such legislation direct that these records be released to the public in the JFK
Collection.” Hearings are urgently needed on this matter.
Prepared by: Douglas Horne, Former Chief Analyst for Military
Records, ARRB
Unexpected Revelations That Resulted (Directly or
Indirectly) from the Work of the ARRB and Its Staff
• Many
autopsy photographs (at least 6, and possibly 18) are
missing.
• Two
skull x-rays are missing; and the
authenticity of three others is doubtful.
• Many
witnesses to JFK’s autopsy (including two FBI agents) have disowned
and
repudiated
certain autopsy photographs taken of the body (namely, depicting the
back
of the
head) as completely inaccurate.
• The brain
photographs in the official autopsy collection were repudiated
(i.e.,
disowned)
under oath, by the official photographer (John Stringer) and an FBI agent
(Frank
O’Neill) who was present at the autopsy.
• Sworn
testimony taken by the ARRB staff, and analysis of the testimony previously
taken by the Warren Commission, and of the interviews conducted by the HSCA,
revealed the extremely high likelihood that a fraudulent, or substitute brain
was examined after JFK’s death, and that these dishonest photographs are what
were placed into the National Archives in 1966.
• JFK’s
firm orders (issued in 1963) to withdraw all U.S. military advisors from
Vietnam
(by the
end of 1965) were conclusively proven by records obtained from the files of the
Pentagon’s
Joint Staff Secretariat.
• Other
records from the Office of the Joint Staff Secretariat revealed the active
planning
(and
lobbying for) a massive U.S. military
invasion of Cuba by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Spring of 1962 (well
before the Cuban Missile Crisis), as well as throughout much of 1963 (after
the
Cuban Missile Crisis). Both invasion plans included recommending
specific pretexts
(false justifications) for the proposed invasions. [President
Kennedy did
not follow
the advice, in either instance.]
•
Interviews of CIA employees conducted by the ARRB staff, and a limited
authenticity
study
commissioned by the ARRB, have created serious doubts about both the
provenance,
and authenticity, of the famous “Zapruder Film” of President Kennedy’s
assassination.
• This
information sheet pertains directly to why we need a “Martin Luther King”
Act;
just
as was the case for the JFK Records Act, the results that may be obtained from
such an
Act cannot be anticipated ahead of time. However, the JFK Act was predicated
upon the
proposition that the American people could handle the truth, whatever it was,
and that
they deserved the fullest possible disclosure about
their own history.
Prepared by: Douglas Horne, former Chief Analyst for Military
Records, ARRB.
No comments:
Post a Comment