"I regard this as the best lead that we have
ever had on the Kennedy assassination as to who may have been involved in the
assassination of President Kennedy.” - Jim Lesar
At the CAPA Press
Conference over Sunshine Week 2017, Jim Lesar talked about “…..a new lawsuit
that my organization filed. It is seeking records relating to the September 25,
1963 memorandum at a meeting chaired by General Curtis LeMay - if it ever, an
opponent of president Kennedy and that meeting had detailed report by Desmond
Fitzgerald who was involved in the AMLASH business. He referred to the CIA
study of the Hitler plot, as a means to use against the Fidel Castro and his
regime.”
“The fact is that this memo would have been released by the review board but
apparently there was no investigation of this allegation that the CIA was
studying plots to, studying the Hitler plot as a means of conducting operations
against Castro. So we have asked for that information and the CIA initially
denied having any, then it said, oh wait a minute we do have some and then it
later reversed. I filed that lawsuit to see what happens with the CIA.”
“Another lawsuit that
is important for you to understand is the lawsuit brought by Carl Oglesby in
1987, Carl Oglesby, you may remember, I hope, was the leader of the Vietnam war
effort, he was a president of the students for democratic society. Early on, he
wrote an article in 1989 or so called "The Secret Treaty of Fort
Hunt", and in that he laid out the case that in a series of meetings at
the end of World War II and thereafter, top American officials made a deal with
General Reinhart Gehlen and the Gehlen organization to put Gehlen in charge of
intelligence in Eastern Europe, in fact in all of Europe it turned out. Until
such time that Germany regained its independence as a state, and then he would
become head of the Bundesnachrichtendienst the equivalent of our CIA. The
result of that, we have learned, as a result of the lawsuit which is now in its
28th or 29th year, was that we found after almost three decades of litigation
when the CIA, which had been supposed to release all the records related to
Oglesby's request including ... The CIA said that they had been forced to
release as a result of the anti-war crime disclosure act, anti-Nazi war crimes
disclosure act.”
“So, the key finding is that we found out in 2013 that, because we forced out
another 113,000 pages of documents. One of them was on OSS report, which
reported that Werner von Alvensleben, Jr. according to the OSS report, was a
former Nazi assassin, but in 1933 he headed, on behalf of Hitler, an off string
official had then been traded back to Germany, allegedly became a known agent
at that point, and went to work for the OSS. It turns out that immediately
after, near the time of JFK assassination in Dallas, Werner von Alvensleben,
Jr. was in Dallas, it further turns out that he was a long time close buddy of
D. Harold Byrd, the owner of the Texas School Book Depository Building. Byrd
was allegedly not in Dallas at the time of the assassination, allegedly he was
on a hunting safari in Mozambique. The owner of the safari the hunting
expedition and the enormous expedition site in Mozambique was Werner von
Alvensleben, Jr.”
“The story is much more complicated, we have put these facts before the court,
in our case, and asked the court to investigate. Again information on this can
be found on our website: aarclibrary.org, particularly with the case of October
with some essays that have been written by Daniel Alcorn who was done some
really splendid research investigating this lead. I regard this as the best lead that we have ever had on the Kennedy
assassination as to who may have been involved in the assassination of
President Kennedy.”
Absolutely fascinating article! I hadn't heard about this. Thank you! The part about Nazi assassin/OSS agent Werner von Alvensleben, Jr. being in Dallas at the time of the JFK assassination - and him owning the safari site where Byrd went to hide out and "hunt" during the assassination - is all just a huge coincidence, i'm sure. ;)
ReplyDelete