Saturday, December 21, 2019

Steve Jones on the Paine Project and Ruth Paine

THE CONFESSIONS OF RUTH PAINE   by Steve Jones


Oswald’s family was brought to the Dallas area by Ruth Paine. Ruth Paine had been instrumental in getting Oswald a job at the Texas Book Depository. The Mannlicher-Carcano, the alleged murder rifle, had supposedly been stored in a garage of the Paines. Following the assassination, Ruth Paine was called by Oswald during his detention to have her obtain a lawyer for him, a task which she failed to complete much to the benefit of the assassins.

Once a conspiracy was deemed to exist, and even our government in the House Select Committee concluded that there was a probable conspiracy, the Paines had to be viewed as having been involved in it. An assassination Gestalt with the patsy serving as a lightning rod, cannot be successfully completed unless the patsy is delivered to the scene of the killing. Ruth Paine accomplished the crucial twin assassination tasks of getting Oswald into the Dallas area and arranging to get him a job in the Texas Book Depository Building. Therefore, the Paines, albeit on a need-to-know basis, were involved in the plot.

In whose service were the Paines? 

Michael Paine came from families which were in the Boston Brahmin society – the Cabot and Forbes families. He was an heir of his maternal grandmother, Elise Cabot Forbes. He was not likely to be controlled by the Soviets, Castro or the Mafia. He had top secret clearance in his job at Bell Helicopter despite the fact that his father, George Lyman Paine, had been a Trotskyist. In Cold War United States to get such clearance when your father had been a Trotskyist, a quid pro quo had to be provided. Ruth Paine’s father was William Avery Hyde, an official in the Agency for International Development, which frequently provided cover for overseas intelligence operations. 

According to the excellent work of Steve Jones, Barbara LaMonica and Carol Hewett, Ruth Paine’s sister, Sylvia Hoke, had CIA affiliations. Ruth Paine was friendly with George DeMohrenshildt, a sophisticated White Russian exile and CIA operative who, although thirty-five years Oswald’s senior, became Oswald’s closest friend in Dallas. According to recent research in the 1980s Ruth Paine assisted illegal anti-socialist activity in Nicaragua.

Ruth and Michael Paine could not have been Soviet, Castro or Mafia agents. They had to be agents of the killing force, our U.S. intelligence. If they had been Soviet or Castro agents, an innocent government would have swooped down on them and seen them as clear beacons leading to the killers. Our government did not cause them any trouble. The Paines are criminal co-conspirators in the killing of President Kennedy and would and should now be prosecuted by a guiltless government.

As some readers of the JFK/Deep Politics Quarterly may be aware, Carol Hewett, Barbara Lamonica, and I have been conducting research on Ruth and Michael Paine, arguably two of the most significant yet overlooked individuals in the tapestry of people, places, and events that continue to swirl around the vortex that we know as the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I would like to share with the Quarterly's readers some thoughts that Ruth Paine revealed to a close personal friend of hers. This friend subsequently discussed these thoughts with me, but sought from me a promise [being kept] never to reveal her identity in order to protect her privacy.

In the spring of 1997 Jim Douglass, a researcher and Christian peace worker, put me in contact with Ruth's friend in the hope that she might be willing to give me some valuable insights into the life of Ruth Paine, once a central figure in the lives of Lee and Marina Oswald, and, by extension, their children. When I traveled to the friend's home and knocked on her door, she greeted me by saying that we should go somewhere else to talk because she feared that her home might be subject to electronic surveillance. When we did finally sit down to talk, she apologized for seeming paranoid, but quickly gave me reason to believe that her fears were not unfounded. She explained that she had been a Christian peace worker during the turbulent Reagan-Bush years when the United States government was heavily funding the Contras in their efforts to overthrow the populist Sandanista government. Since the peace workers helped the poor and the oppressed natives who generally sided with the Sandanistas, United States intelligence agencies made life very difficult for them.

Ruth's friend explained to me that she had recently returned from her fourth (that is my best recollection of the number...) tour of duty in Nicaragua. Since she had returned to the States, she had been openly followed in the streets by federal law enforcement agents in a manner that was obviously meant to intimidate her. FBI agents had visited her home on several occasions. Her mail had been opened and her phone had been tapped. If anyone doubts that the United States government really does this sort of thing to people who openly oppose the agenda of the national security state, I highly recommend the book Resisting Reagan by Christian Smith. [ed. note: Steve's point is well taken here].

This friend got to know Ruth in 1990 when they were both working for pro-Nica, one of the various peace organizations that was involved in that beleaguered Central American country. She went on to explain to me that when Ruth first showed up at the camp, everyone began to distrust her because of her behavior, which overlapped every characteristic of a CIA infiltrator. Ruth was taking notes off of bulletin boards, asking people many personal questions, and taking photographs for supposed purposes that turned out to be false. In fact, Ruth never went anywhere without a notebook handy, ready to jot down anything and everything she saw or heard. The rest of the group had gotten very good at spotting infiltrators, because the CIA was always sending people down there either to gather information or to act as agent provocateur to disrupt their efforts.

One evening when volunteer Sue Wheaton told the group about Ruth's connection to the Kennedy assassination, the suspicion intensified to the point of paranoia. Based on what the volunteers had seen the CIA do in Nicaragua, none of these people would hesitate to question whether or not it was possible for the agency to assassinate an American president. Because of the volunteers' conviction in that regard, Ruth became ostracized except for one woman who, though she maintained a distrust for Ruth, took a personal liking toward her and began to develop a friendship with her.

The group openly confronted Mrs. Paine with their suspicions, but she would adamantly deny any connection to the CIA (or, one presumes, other 'initial' agencies), and steadfastly stuck to her Warren Commission testimony of being an innocently maligned do-gooder regarding the assassination. When confronted so openly it was common 'agent' behavior to quietly depart, based on the assumption that the 'cover' had been blown. But because of Ruth's persistent denials and the group's unwillingness to kick someone out who had been wrongfully accused, Ruth was asked to take a leave of absence from the group instead of being summarily dismissed.

Her friend was given the assignment of driving her across the border into Costa Rica to a retreat center where peace workers sometimes went for badly needed R & R. When they approached the camp and were getting out of their car, several others came up to greet them and help them with their luggage. As those people approached the car and saw who it was they started screaming, "Oh my God, it's Ruth Paine, she's CIA -- get her away from us!!" Ruth Paine's reputation had somehow preceded her and they were forced to return to the volunteer camp where Ruth bravely, and without complaint, finished out her year before returning to the United States.

Upon returning to America, Ruth and the woman-source of this story continued the friendship that they had begun in the jungles of Nicaragua. The friend explained to me what a strange feeling it is to care about someone, to find someone likable and personable yet to not completely trust them. The friend always had the feeling that Ruth Paine was hiding something, that she was holding something back and that she wasn't being totally honest about her connections to the CIA or her involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald. The two of them could sit around the kitchen table drinking coffee and discussing any topic under the sun, except for two: the CIA and the Kennedy assassination.

Yet the friend continued to gently press Ruth, reminding her that confession is good for the soul. At one point, Ruth became irritated about the constant inquiries into the assassination and told her friend, "If you want to know about the Kennedy assassination, I have old issues of Life magazine that I can give you. That will tell you everything you need to know." However, that disclaimer not withstanding, the friend did tell me that over the years there were a few times that Ruth did open up ever so slightly about both the CIA and the assassination. These comments, along with some other general information that the friend shared with me helped to both confirm and to dismiss some of the previous thoughts that we 'Paine researchers' had developed.

One hypothesis that can now be dismissed is that Ruth Paine's long vacation in the summer of 1963 had any sinister or clandestine purpose. In July, 1963, she drove her 1955 Chevy station wagon on a whirlwind tour of the eastern United States, culminating in her picking up Marina Oswald in New Orleans and bringing her and one child (Marina was expecting their second child in October) back to Texas in late September, as Lee was about to embark (unknown to them) on his adventures in Mexico. At the 1995 COPA conference, I gave a presentation in which I hypothesized that Ruth may have been involved in helping to impersonate Oswald on this trip, or even that Lee may have joined her in order to be seen at several demonstrations that Ruth attended during the trip, such as Dr. King's "I have a dream" speech/protest march in Washington in late August, 1963. But her friend informed me that Ruth takes those long cross-country journeys every summer, that she loves to drive, and that on those trips she has been visiting the same people for years, including her ex-husband Michael, whom she divorced in 1971.

What has been corroborated beyond any doubt is that Ruth has immediate family members who were employed by the CIA. Documents have been located at the Archives showing that her sister was a staff psychologist for the CIA as of 1961 and that her father had been approached by the Agency to run an educational co-operative alliance in Vietnam in 1957. 

Though refusing to admit that she herself ever had anything to do with the CIA, she admitted to her friend that her father had been in their employment. She said that while working as an insurance executive for Nationwide Insurance, and later for the Agency for International Development, her father had often gathered intelligence for the CIA. But she was quick to add that he would never have done so if "he had known what the CIA was really all about." By this she meant that her father was serving in the capacity of a genuine patriotic, anti-Communist fervor and did not really understand how the CIA used such intelligence gathering to undermine local economies and suppress indigenous people so that American corporations could move in and exploit local cheap labor. The fact that Ruth understands this showed that she was quite attuned to the motivations, methods, and purposes of the Central Intelligence Agency.

The one and only time Ruth showed any cracks at all regarding the assassination itself was when she was having difficulties with her now 40-year-old daughter. With tears in her eyes, Ruth stated that her daughter did not want to speak to her any more until she came to grips with "the evil that I have been associated with in my life." When the friend gently pushed further and asked, "What evil?" Ruth clammed up. But the friend assured me that she was convinced this was a veiled reference to the Kennedy assassination and that Ruth was not talking strictly about Lee Oswald. The friend firmly believes this because the comment was made in the context of a brief discussion about the assassination. I learned this after several lengthy visits with the friend and decided that it was time to take things one step further. I asked the friend if she would be willing to act as an intermediary between interested researchers and Ruth Paine, and the friend accepted the challenge.

Ruth was going to be making one of her yearly summer trips and would stop to visit the friend. The arrangement was that I would give her articles that Barbara, Carol, and I had written for PROBE along with some documentation. The friend was to 'confront' Ruth with the information and ask her to explain it. Depending how this went, the friend would consider arranging a meeting between the researchers cited and Mrs. Paine.

Predictably, things fell apart at this point. A week before the scheduled arrival, the friend called me and told me that Ruth had canceled out, calling and saying that she was very busy and would have to cut her trip short and thus wouldn't have time for the visit. The friend noted that this was out of character because Ruth had been especially looking forward to the visit for a reason that cannot be divulged here. I could not help but think that someone had been listening to our phone conversations and that Mrs. Paine had been tipped off.

The friend then began to distance herself from me. Phone messages were not returned and letters went unanswered. After several months, I decided to leave her alone. I determined that for her own reasons, she desired no more contact with me. But I cannot help but surmise that her abrupt dismissal of me, and the work I was seeking to enlarge or corroborate, was out of a genuine sense of fear.

This episode only served to convince me even more that Ruth Paine was, and still is, working in some type of intelligence capacity. It also showed me what a determined, poised, and tough lady she truly is. Though she was under the most intense pressure in Nicaragua and was surrounded by people who distrusted her, she kept her cool. And later, when in the relaxed company of a genuine friend who truly cared about her, Ruth still refused to let down her guard for a brief moment.

If Ruth Pain is an agent, and I still firmly believe she is, she is a damn good one.
Vincent Salandria once told me that the Paines, whether unwitting or not, played a key role in the assassination conspiracy by getting Oswald into the Texas School Book Depository. The conspirators knew that the people they chose for such a vital role had to be rock solid individuals who would never crack.

After my experience with Ruth Paine's friend, I would have to say that Salandria was absolutely right.

BILL KELLY NOTES:

 I too have talked to Sue Wheaton about the Nicaragua episodes, and Sue said that Ruth Paine traveled with a man who said he was from Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, where Ruth (and I, and Coretta Scott King and Rod Serling) attended school. 

When I was a student at nearby University of Dayton in 1969-71 I took some classes at Antioch, including a history of Vietnam that was taught by a former CIA Saigon Station Chief. 
As a graduate student at the Antioch Center for Social Research and Action in Baltimore in 1973-4 my primary professor was active in the Polish union movement, and once brought in a young guy who just returned from the Soviet Union where he traveled around video taping whatever he came across, including the May Day parade of military hardware and leadership. 

This kid showed us what he had recorded a few days after showing the CIA. 

In addition, as I worked closely with Carol Hewett and met Barbara Lamonica and Steve Jones at the COPA conferences in Washington and Dallas, I was aware of their detailed research, that Carol shared with me, as I shared with her what I learned about Michael's mom, Ruth Forbes Paine Young and my recorded interview with her husband Arthur Young, the eccentric inventor of the Bell Helicopter. 

While this article is accurate, I thought I would add the Antioch connection, and note the fact that I do take exception to Steve's determination that the summer vacation of 1963 is, as he puts it:is "one hypothesis that can now be dismissed." 

"One hypothesis that can now be dismissed is that Ruth Paine's long vacation in the summer of 1963 had any sinister or clandestine purpose. In July, 1963, she drove her 1955 Chevy station wagon on a whirlwind tour of the eastern United States, culminating in her picking up Marina Oswald in New Orleans and bringing her and one child (Marina was expecting their second child in October) back to Texas in late September, as Lee was about to embark (unknown to them) on his adventures in Mexico. At the 1995 COPA conference, I gave a presentation in which I hypothesized that Ruth may have been involved in helping to impersonate Oswald on this trip, or even that Lee may have joined her in order to be seen at several demonstrations that Ruth attended during the trip, such as Dr. King's "I have a dream" speech/protest march in Washington in late August, 1963. But her friend informed me that Ruth takes those long cross-country journeys every summer, that she loves to drive, and that on those trips she has been visiting the same people for years, including her ex-husband Michael, whom she divorced in 1971."

The reason this trip cannot be dismissed just because she took the trip every year because it was the trip that led to her meeting not Michael but Michael's mom Ruth Forbes Paine Young, who was best friends and - traveling companion of Mary Bancroft, Allen Dulles' agent and mistress, and it was on the return leg of this trip that Ruth Paine picked up Marina, the oldest daughter and the rifle and delivered them to Texas while Oswald went to Mexico. That was a significant side trip that she didn't make on any of the other trips. 

Steve Jones' article is important however, for bringing out the fact that the eldest daughter is estranged from her mother and would remain so until "she came to grips with the evil" that she was associated with in her life," presumably her role in the assassination drama. 

Friday, December 20, 2019

CAPA Disinformation Conference?

CAPA DISINFORMATION CONFERENCE ?


JOHN ORR AND ROLF MOWATT-LARSSEN RECONSIDERED

By Bill Kelly

Jim DiEugenio was the first to wonder why Rolf Mowatt-Larssen was asked to make a major presentation at CAPA, and I promised to explain it to him, as I will do now.

In addition, in response to a CAPA questionaire to all conference registrants, David Nesbitt expressed his displeasure with RM Larssen and John Orr in more detail.


“...... I appreciate the dialogue and hope my opinions will be helpful and an encouragement to the organization........ In my opinion, three disinformation agents spoke in Dallas this year:  Judyth Baker, John Orr, and Rolf Mowatt-Larssen.”

“Rolf Mowatt-Larssen's presentation was disgusting.  Why was he invited to the conference?  Is CAPA really against political assassinations?  It doesn't seem like it, if you are inviting the perpetrators of political assassinations to come and condescendingly tells us how a rogue agent might have used LHO to assassinate JFK.  What a joke.  I am tempted to ask for my money back and resign my membership from CAPA.  I also question the wisdom and integrity of Larry Schnapf in inviting John Orr to spend so much time to present the same lies and propaganda that have surrounded this case for 56 years.  What is happening to CAPA?......."

Bill Kelly:

In response to Mr. Nesbett's disinformation allegation I would like to point out that the word disinformation stems from the Russian word diz-information - and is a very specific description of intentionally false information being distributed by an intelligence agency in support of a government’s policy, and if it isn’t that it isn’t disinformation but something else – possibly misinformation.

Judy Vary Baker is not connected to an intelligence agency, as far as I know, and is a major distraction but she is not sprouting dis-information.

Both Rolf Mowatt-Larssen and John Orr are former U.S. government employees of the CIA and Justice Department, so they are certainly connected to their agency and department and could be dis-informationists, but they don’t sprout disinformation.

I once wrote an article in response to everyone who disagrees with someone calling them “disinformation agents” and focused on “The Real Disinformation Agents of Dealey Plaza” – Hugh Aynesworth, Priscilla Johnson McMillan and Gordon McLendon - the radio station owner who knew Jack Ruby. To them I would add Joseph Goulden, one of David Atlee Phillips' media assets who tried to get Oswald officially charged with "furthering a communist conspiracy." 

Besides those guys, there is an on-going psychological warfare campaign – what they call an “active measure,” that was the original cover-story for the Dealey Plaza Operation – and that is Cuban Castro Communists (CCC) were behind the conspiracy, something that was originally promoted by dozens of CIA connected agents, operatives and assets in the immediate aftermath of the murder.

House Select Committee on Assassinations(HSCA) investigator Dan Hardway asked David Atlee Phillips, one of the promotors of the CCC cover-story, why so many of his agents, operators and assets were promoting the idea Castro was behind the conspiracy to kill JFK and he said he didn’t know.

Whenever the Oswald as a Lone Wolf assassin is seriously questioned, the fall back position is always the CCC conspiracy, and even today, despite the fact that this theory has been totally discredited and debunked, there are serious attempts to revive it in books, films and TV shows, as former CIA agents Brian Latell and Bob Bair (JFK Declassiefied) have tried to do, along with CIA media assets Gus Russo (Brothers in Arms) and Phil Sheon (A Cruel and Sensless Act). 

Now that’s certified disinformaton, that is not being promoted by Rolf M.-Larssen, who does not parrot the official cover-story. Apparently he didn't get the memo. 

Larssen was a high level CIA intelligence officer who served at eight over seas posts, two as Chief of Station in Moscow – Larssen has taken a unique approach to the assassination, one that I appreciate and adopt.

John Judge once said that he worked from the streets up and Colonel Fletcher Prouty worked for the top down, and they met at the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Instead of working from the streets of Dallas and ground up – Larssen flips the conspiracy coin and says, hey – if what we are saying is true – that Oswald was set up as the Patsy, that JFK was killed by a first class sniper who wasn’t in the Sixth Floor window, and it was a successful covert intelligence operation and coup d’etat, then the suspects are limited.

If it was a coup, it is limited to those who took over the government, and if it was a covert intelligence operation – there were only a dozen individuals with the knowledge, power and capability to pull off such an operation and get away with it.

Larssen names the usual suspects – James Jesus Angleton, David Atlee Phillips, William Harvey, Allen Dulles, Ed Lansdale, and he adds a new name – Jacob Easterline. “Hiphinated Jake” – as David A. Phillips calls him, was responsible for Operation Success – the 1954 Guatemalan Coup and the Bay of Pigs, and the dissolution of the JMWAVE base.

While I disagree with Larssen in that the CIA officers involved were “renegades,” I believe they had the approval of the highest authorities in the various agencies and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

And as John Newman distinctly pointed out in his presentation after Larssen, the CIA isn’t the only covert operator in the game, and Army Intelligence can legally operate domestically, does so, and was all over the Dealey Plaza operation.

I will be devoting a specific blog post to Larssen soon, as there is much more there to digest. 

THE JUSTICE DEPT. AND JOHN ORR 

As Nesbett said:  “We should focus on getting the Justice Department to reopen the case as per the HSCA and abandon these flawed and useless exercises that further muddy the waters with lies and propaganda.”

Flawed and useless exercises, muddy waters with lies and propaganda? Wait a minute there Nelly. 

If getting the Justice Department to reopen the case is the goal, then you can’t have a more important ally than John Orr.

As a Federal Attorney in the Justice Department for many years in Atlanta, when John Orr was called to Washington D.C. to receive a special award from Attorney General Janet Reno, he used the opportunity to give the AG a special report he wrote on the ballistics of Dealey Plaza that clearly demonstrates that the head shot that killed the President was not taken from the Sixth Floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.

Orr convinced the Justice Department, the FBI and the National Archives to conduct DNA tests on the flesh matter embedded in the bullet fragments found on the floor of the limo, the only such tests ever conducted.
Both John Orr and Rolf M. Larsson are key players in this drama now, and CAPA will be working with them, and together we hope to resolve this case to a legal and moral certainty, soon.

Larry Schnapf responds to Nesbett:

Our agreement was to focus on Oswald and not address the question of the grassy knoll. John did exactly what the DA would have done-use what the WC and HSCA concluded was the evidence in the public record tying Oswald to the assassination.

This was a dry run of what would happen in a real proceeding. The petitioners had the burden of poking holes in the DA’s case.

The comments (by Nesbett) is why we did not want the mock of inquiry to be part of the program. The commentator simply fails to comprehend what the exercise was about.

I think the real value of the exercise to CAPA was the 45 minutes of questions afterwards and not one misguided person.

John stuck to the evidence linking Oswald to the shooting. He had as much time as the petitioners. There was an extensive 45 minute q/a where a full range of questions was asked. I don't remember all the questions that were asked. It is possible someone asked us about evidence that was not introduced in the proceeding. It is also possible the writer has read john's materials on the internet.

Again, John's role was to robustly push back against our presentation as the Dallas district attorney would do in any actual proceeding.  This was a practice run where we wanted to see how a judge would respond to the various arguments. John stuck to the evidence in the historical record. 

On the walker shooting, John did what the district attorney would have done. The fact is the both the WC and HSCA found this evidence credible. We of course disagree and the value of the exercise was to have a judge evaluate the opposing arguments.

I explained the purpose of the mock proceeding and offered the previously agreed disclaimer. The writer was apparently not paying attention or arrived late. In either event, he fundamentally misapprehended the purpose of the exercise.

 As far as Larsen, I have come to know him very well and like those who speculate on his motives. I believe he will prove to be the Fletcher Prouty of the CIA. His insight into the agency's inner workings are invaluable. And he admitted his is relatively new to the assassination and is willing to reconsider his views. But he was not invited to speak about whether Oswald killed the president but how a plot could have been conceived and carried out by members of the CIA.

John Orr:

Mr. Nesbitt should be careful about slinging around phrases like "Orr's lies," unless he has some proof.  I said in my presentation that everything I stated was evidence contained in the records of the official government investigations.  That was a true statement, and I challenge Mr. Nesbitt to prove otherwise. Apparently, I told Mr. Nesbitt after the program that I do not believe Oswald tried to kill Gen.
Walker.  That is also true, and I did not state otherwise in my presentation.  I said the evidence was that Oswald told Marina that he shot at Walker and that there were several pictures of Walker's house in Oswald's possession, at least one of which was taken with Oswald's camera. That too is a correct statement of the Warren Commission record. 

Bill Simpich, representing Oswald, was the movant and the State of Texas was the respondent in the Court of Inquiry.  In most courts, the movant has the burden and argues first, the respondent goes next, and the movant can choose to reserve time for a rebuttal.  Bill and I discussed this order when preparing.  We each had a total of one hour to argue.  I told Bill I assumed he would reserve time for a rebuttal.  The decision whether to give a rebuttal and, if so, how much time to reserve for it was solely Bill Simpich's. 

I believe the Court of Inquiry served a valuable purpose as a realistic dry run to see what it would be like to try to exonerate Oswald.  The intense interest shown by the attendees, with a line out the door to ask questions, bears that out.  A distinction must be made between the formal program and the Q and A afterwards.  During the Q and A, attendees asking questions and panel members alike stated their personal opinions, clearly represented as such.  When asked a question, I answered truthfully based on my beliefs, as did the other presenters.  The were many different opinions expressed by many people, and the discourse was civil and respectful, as it should be. That is what a healthy search for the truth looks like.

I did not seek out CAPA and force my way in to make speeches. CAPA sought me out and invited me to speak.  I reluctantly agreed, since I hate public speaking.  All of the CAPA leadership knew well from the beginning what my beliefs are about the assassination.  Dr. Wecht became very familiar with them in 2013 when we worked together on the Fox News 50th anniversary show.  Knowing that, CAPA has invited me three years in a row to speak at their conferences.  


I am in fact a citizen against political assassinations, in that I believe JFK was murdered because of his political office and certain official acts he and his administration had taken and were planning to take.

So, my beliefs are completely in sync with the title of the organization. Larry, I know you had a policy of welcoming speakers of differing views as long as they were serious researchers.  I think you and I agree that is the best way to move forward in a search for the greater truth.  Now that CAPA has taken over the JFK Lancer programs, presenting diverse opinions of serious researchers and scholars has become even more important. 

If CAPA is going to become an organization that allows only people who believe exactly the same thing to participate, it will become a self-affirming closed circle without push back or meaningful forward movement.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

CAPA 2019 Dallas Conference Critique

David P. Nesbitt wrote:

.......Rolf Mowatt-Larssen's presentation was disgusting.  Why was he invited to the conference?  Is CAPA really against political assassinations?  It doesn't seem like it, if you are inviting the perpetrators of political assassinations to come and condescendingly tells us how a rogue agent might have used LHO to assassinate JFK.  What a joke.  I am tempted to ask for my money back and resign my membership from CAPA.  I also question the wisdom and integrity of Larry Schnapf in inviting John Orr to spend so much time to present the same lies and propaganda that have surrounded this case for 56 years.  What is happening to CAPA?.......


...... I appreciate the dialogue and hope my opinions will be helpful and an encouragement to the organization.

Re:  "Would you mind telling me what propaganda and lies were told during this segment?"

Yes, I would be happy to address Orr's lies and propaganda.  The Warren Report conclusions are certainly not evidence and they are often demonstrably false.  The Warren Commission testimony, while given under oath, was often rehearsed, often obtained through leading questions, often steered away from crucial areas, not given publicly, not subjected to cross-examination, and evidently altered in certain circumstances.  John Orr apparently believes Oswald was firing from the 6th floor window and parrotted the Warren Commission conclusions to this end.  There is no credible evidence that places Oswald in that window at the time of the assassination and the parafin test results prove that he did not fire a rifle on that day.  To argue otherwise is to spread lies and propaganda.  The most egregious example of this behavior is Orr's assertion that Oswald attempted to assassinate General Walker, based on Marina's coerced and dubious testimony against her husband.  There is zero evidence that Oswald shot at Walker and there is ample evidence to the contrary.  Even General Walker himself did not believe that Oswald was the shooter and told the Warren Commission so.  Later in the day, I confronted Mr. Orr about this and he admitted to me that he did not himself believe that Oswald shot at Walker, but that he used the Warren Commission conclusions to indicate a predilection for violence in order to make a stronger case in the Mock inquiry.  This dissembling is patently dishonest and reprehensible.

I would like to turn the tables and ask, "Would you mind telling me what truthful and reasonable statements were told by John Orr during this segment?"

This case is not an academic exercise.  I am very disappointed in CAPA's efforts along the lines of the mock trial and this mock inquiry.  The Houston mock trial was a debacle.  It and this mock inquiry were a mockery of the actual evidence in this case after 56 years of investigation.  These activities are not helping our cause.  We should focus on getting the Justice Department to reopen the case as per the HSCA and abandon these flawed and useless exercises that further muddy the waters with lies and propaganda.  If not, CAPA should change its name to LEPG (Lawyers Engaging in Parlour Games).

I am a citizen against political assassinations.  The consequences of these assassinations have been the deaths of millions of innocent people from Vietnam to Iraq and the violation of the civil rights, privacy, and human dignity of hundreds of millions of people around the globe.  We cannot afford to play games here.

In my opinion, three disinformation agents spoke in Dallas this year:  Judyth Baker, John Orr, and Rolf Mowatt-Larssen.  CAPA cannot do anything about Judyth Baker.  I am fine if she wants to claim to be a high school cancer researcher and the New Orleans mistress of Lee Harvey Oswald, assertions which can never be corroborted.  That has zero impact on this case.  The problem with her conference is that most of the speakers believe that LBJ was the mastermind of the assassination.  This position is not only false, but harmful to history and the culture.  If LBJ had JFK murdered, then he profited by becoming president rather than going to jail for corruption, but the effects of the assassination end with his decision not to run again in 1968.  However, as Dr. Wecht often says, this was a Coup D'Etat.  It was not merely the changing of a president, but it was the changing of an entire government.  The National Security State took complete power in 1963 and has not relinquished it since.  Judyth's conference denies the true import and lasting consequences of the JFK assassination, as well as all of the others, both foreign and domestic, perpetrated by the same military-industrial complex.

Against all credible evidence, John Orr believes that Oswald shot and wounded JFK and a mafia shooter shot and killed JFK, both from behind.  What kind of organization lends approval to such a ridiculous position 56 years after the assassination?  This is not a rhetorical question.  At best, some mafia players were used as underworld mercenaries to carry out low-level aspects of the plot, but the mafia was not responsible in any way, shape, or form for the assassination.  It did not control the autopsy, the investigation, or the on-going cover-up.  Giving prominence to the likes of Orr and Curington defeats the purpose of CAPA by assigning responsibility to the wrong group and denying, as with Baker's conference, the true import and lasting consequences of the JFK assassination.

The US Government evidence that the CIA has been engaged in political assassination dating back to at least 1953 is beyond dispute.  Why on earth would an organization that is against political assassinations invite a brazen and unapogetic Larssen to speak to us for 90 minutes?  I cannot fathom the reasoning.  Did he promise to beg forgiveness for the organization and deliver the documents that are still being illegally withheld?  If not, why was he given the podium?  To smugly tell us how a rogue agent might have recruited Oswald, but that Oswald had probably just killed JFK on his own?  This presentation was contrary to everything CAPA claims to stand for.  And I personally found it sickening.

CAPA needs to do some seriouse soul-searching and figure out what it is really all about.  Is it just to make a little money and gather 200 people together for intellectual parlour games?  Or is it to unite citizens against political assassinations and disseminate truth about what has been happening since the National Security Act of 1947?  If it is the latter, then CAPA needs to figure out what it really believes and frame the conference around communicating that message.  Disinformation agents can speak at Judy's conference, but they should not be speaking at CAPA's conference.

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Open Upon My Death - AT&T in Dallas

FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22, 1963 (8:34 p.m.)

I was awakened this morning with only one thought in mind: could I afford to get excused from work to go to the parade to see the greatest man of our times, the President of the United States, John F. Kennedy.

Thinking that everyone loved him as much as I did (with the exception of a neighbor who worked in the Republican Party whom I had words with in the front yard - more on her later, and Mr. Edwin C. Clark, President of AT&T - who made a speech in Texas which was put into a pamphlet form and distributed among telephone people during the campaign trying to sway people, of which I did not appreciate.

Anyway, I decided there would be such a crowd that I could never get a glimpse of my favorite couple, much less get to shake his hand and let him know how I had fought for him in my small way.

Here are the events that happened to me, events that have caused me to count the days and hours until I became 55 years old and could retire, so I could pay a moral dept to society (as my lips have been sealed by the Federal Communications Law.)

I was on my lunch hour (12 - 1 p.m.) and Mr. Allen, Traffic Chief, District 1, 4100 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas, was also on his lunch hour. The telephone in the cafeteria rang about 12:35-40 p.m., an emergency for Mr. Clark. "The president has been shot." (silence). You could hear your heart beat.

Mr. Allen stumbled around the cash register, hitting the rail the foot trays slide on - he's a large man, about like Lyndon Johnson and sorta favors him too. (You notice these things without moving.).

District 1 had all the connections for Kennedy's speech at the Trade Mart (going to the White House, UP, API, and the FBI.

Now hen mad frustrations of switching all the connections to District II, and Mr. J. A. Potts and Mr. Paul Cheatum (over both districts) were there. Parkland Hospital's Central Office on Melrose appeared Unit II, District II. I am on District II, a service assistant. My job is training people and moving traffic.

Someone at our lunch table said we'd better go back to work, they probably need us. I did not want to go back to work for fear that I would hear that President Kennedy was dead.

I got up to go back to work about 12:50-:55. The switchboard was lit up like a Christmas tree. Everyone went to the board to help the operators, including myself. The Assistant Chief Operators and Chief Operators took our posts. Every signal I answered, there was a radio or television in the background blaring out about shooting. Over and over customers (all but one) would put us in the know by saying, "Did you know the president was shot? Have you heard the president was shot in Dallas? I can't believe it, must be a joke about the president...." -- as always when a disaster strikes.

Then I picked up an Irving signal (Blackburn exchange) about or near 2 p.m., The radio or TV was very loud.  A women placed a call to North Richland Hills (Butler Exchange) which is a fringe office of Fort Worth. I gave her the area code (817), dialed the number on a direct Fort Worth circuit and asked for her number. She evidently did not hear me for the radio was announcing the news. The number in Fort Worth answered. Again, I asked for the number.

The Irving customer said, "Just a minute." I thought she was talking to me, so I waited.

When she returned to the hone (approximately 5 - 10 seconds later) she blurted out, "Will Lee get his bonus loot?"

A man at the Fort Worth number said, "What are you calling me, and don't mention my name on the phone. Kennedy has to be dead for to get the bonus."

"He is dead," the Irving customer said. "They've just announced it on the radio."

I closed the key, stunned. I do have a witness to this, whom I did not report because I will not involved an innocent person.

I then made a call back to check on the Irving number (for the correct number charge). I monitored the connection again, not believing my ears.

"Don't you call here again. You will be contacted. They are not suspicious of him, no."

I closed the key and reported the call to the Assistant Chief Operator.

Later, I was relieved of the position and told that Mr. Anderson wanted to see me. He was behind me and walked to the district office. He had the toll ticket in his hand and told me I might be questioned by the FBI. I told him I didn't care if I lost my job, because I loved President Kennedy.

Reaching the district office, Mr. Potts was at his desk, his head lowered like he was writing. Mr. Cheatum interviewed me and all I told him were the exact words of the conversation. I also told him that the Irving caller said, "Just a minute," and that was why I was on the line. Mr. Cheatum told me the information would be given to the telephone company's investigators for the FBI.

I left the district office, escorted by Mr. Anderson. He told me to take the position with open communication from Parkland Hospital to FBI Headquarters at the White House and stay on the line and not release them - not once was there a conversation between two people. \

After I went on my break I did not take the same position.

After work I stopped at Wyatts grocery store for some kidney for our two cats. My neighbor Mrs. Norris, whom I've mentioned earlier, walked up to me and said, "Well , what do you think of your President Kennedy now?" ...........

The record of the call I took and heard part of was recorded and sealed and addressed to the FBI and placed in another envelope addressed to my attorney in case of my death. I locked the envelope in my locker at the telephone company. - I kept them there in case I was questioned again so I could easily reach it.

I talked with the Priest - Father Huber, who administered the Rite of Absolution to President Kennedy. I told him that I had information, but did not say that I had a moral obligation to society when I could talk. My attorney was told the same thing.

The telephone company, the FBI nor the Warren Commission have contacted me. I have kept this information inside of me.

The first week of July 1965, I was on vacation. Returning to work, I had no occasion to go to my locker for several days. Then I needed some training material and opened the locker (on the 5th floor) and it was empty. I asked Mrs. Smith (on the 4th floor) where my things were. She referred me that Mr. Thoru, a JFY (janitor), had ordered the lockers of those on vacation to be emptied - all of the materials were to be put into a box - so the lockers could be painted. The box was supposed to be at the end of the locker room. I searched but found no box. He told me it was probably put in one of the store rooms and he would find it the next day. I told him I had material in the locker for the FBI. (He was not in our office when the president was assassinated).

Mr. Anderson had been transferred to Arkansas, Mr. Cheatum to St. Louis. A Mr. Smith was our Traffic Manager now 

The next day, they told me that everything in the box was burned. I filed a grievance and had Mr. Smith give me a letter and one to the Union stating that I was not responsible for lost company material - dated July 12, 1965. They paid me by check for my personal belongings. I had Mr. Smith call and get Mr. Anderson in Little Rock, Ark., on the line. I talked with him and asked how to get duplicates of the material for the FBI. He said that the information was given to the telephone company's attorney's or special agents, but the FBI had never asked for any information concerning President Kennedy's death and was not volunteered. WHY?

Mr. Thon was reprimanded and sent to St. Louis. Mr. Potts retired.

My attorney advised me that my position with the company was hardly enough to try to force the company to give me a copy of the information - the clock time on the toll ticket, the length of the conversation, the number called and the calling number.

He advised me to write it all down in longhand to be opened upon my death. Maybe my debt to society will be paid someday.....

[From the effects of Larry Howard of the Dallas Assassination Information Center.]



























































Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Notes from T&RC Meeting

NOTES From Truth and Recon Committee (TRC) Board Meeting –

It was decided that:

1)      Seek more recognizable signatures on the Ten Points of Agreement document 

2)      Open a Web Site

3)      Start a petition – on line – one that we control the emails of those who sign on.

4)      Hire an attorney to incorporate and get tax-deductable status

5)      Put together four teams of two lawyers and two researchers each for the four major unresolved assassinations of the Sixties – JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X, paying the lawyers $2,000 a month (part time) and the researchers $500 a month (part time). Bill Simpich and Bill Kelly volunteered to take on the JFK case.

6)      Hire an Executive Director based in Washington D.C. at $15,000 a year (part time)

7)      Solicit sizeable tax deductable donations to pay for these expenses from wealthy supporters.


8)      Establish a permanent Washington D.C. based Think Tank – Assassination Archives, Research Center and Museum.

10) Compile a list of books and videos that can be recommended. 












Thursday, November 14, 2019

Valkyrie and Pathfinder at Dealey Plaza - garrison magazine

VALKYRIE AND PATHFINDER AT DEALEY PLAZA 
As published in garrison magazine (Vol. 3, Nov. 2019) 

Please order and subscribe to garrison: The Journal of History and Deep Politics. 













By William E. Kelly, Jr.
(609-346-0229

"We now know to a fairly good degree of certainty what happened at Dealey Plaza. The motives were piling up - the Bay of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, the back channel to Cuba,…to the point they had to assassinate him. I think…with the compilation of the information we have today, that the mechanism of the crime came out of the allegiance between the CIA and the Mafia. They already had an assassination apparatus set up for killing Castro and they just switched targets and killed Kennedy instead." 1)  - Former FBI Agent Bill Turner

After over a half-century of investigating the assassination of President Kennedy I still don’t know who killed JFK, but I am figuring out the M.O. – the Modus Operandi – how it was done, and it’s pretty obvious that it was a Covert Intelligence Operation and the key words to deciphering the details are VALKYRIE and PATHFINDER.

VALKYRIE was the code name for the German military plot that failed to kill Hitler on July 20, 1944, that the CIA said it “studied in detail” for a strategy to use against Fidel Castro. 2)

PATHFINDER was the CIA code name for a detailed tactical plan to kill Castro with a high powered rifle as he rode by in an open jeep. 3)

It appears that these were the specific plans – not plots – detailed contingency plans that were designed to kill Castro but redirected to President Kennedy in Dallas. And if they weren’t such detailed plans, we never would have figured it out.

INTRO – A Basic Research Primer

Before getting into the details of how this was done, I’d like to describe some of the research techniques that were and are being used to take this work further.

A NOTE ON RESEARCH TECHNIQUES

The Archivist of the United States David Ferriero is a blogger - and wrote about the remarkable discovery of thousands of previously unknown letters written by Walt Whitman when he was a federal secretary in the Justice Department during the Civil War. The uncovering of these records was accomplished by a lone professor who was familiar with Whitman's unique signature and went looking through the federal files where Whitman’s official correspondence would likely to be located. And he found some, thousands of them, so many it will take decades for Whitman scholars to properly review them. 4)

But the AOTUS – David Ferriero, who promotes himself as a champion of open government and records, wrote a recommendation to the President shortly before President Trump reneged on his promise to release all of the remaining JFK assassination records in full by 2017, as the JFK Act of 1992 law required. That letter of recommendation itself is still withheld in full from the public. 5)

But calling attention to how the Whitman letters were discovered in the government’s attic where they were all a long, just goes to show that new research techniques can be employed with success, as it is being done in many places on many levels.

HYPOTHESIS

Just as scientists break down complicated problems into smaller parts in order to understand it – we too must take such an approach – and develop some basic hypothesis, as John Newman has done in the course of his work, including – “The plot was designed to make it APPEAR that the Kennedy brothers’ plan to overthrow Castro had been successfully turned around by Fidel, resulting in the assassination.” Other hypothesis grow from this. 6)

ASSUMPTIONS

For starters we have to make some basic assumptions that are necessary to procede using logic and reason as our guides.

The first basic assumption is that the assassination of President Kennedy at Dealey Plaza, whatever you believe occurred there, and regardless of the role of the accused assassin and self-proclaimed Patsy Lee Harvey Oswald, the event was a covert intelligence operation and must be studied as such in order to understand it. As California attorney Bill Simpich, author of State Secret, has said, you must view the assassination as an operation in order to proceed. 7)

Another basic assumption, as the Microsoft analysis of the most recently released assassination records at the National Archives (NARA) concluded, the assassination had something to do with Cuba, as President Kennedy, his accused assassin and the killer of the accused all had ties to Cuba in common, and a large selection of official records on the assassination relate to Cuba. 8)

 RESEARCH TECHNIQUES

In the course of my half-century study of the assassination, Professor Peter Dale Scott has been a guiding light, and I utilize three of his basic research techniques and have developed some of my own.

Peter Dale Scott’s “Negative Template” thesis, Phase One and Phase Two Cover-Stories and recognizing the Psych War – Black Prop Operation to blame the conspiracy on Castro Cuban Communists are key elements in focusing on what’s important and narrowing the suspects. 

The “Negative Template” thesis is the idea that the records that are referenced and referred to elsewhere, but are missing, are the most significant records – as this report on the CIA’s “detailed study” of the Valkyrie plot and the missing Pathfinder records confirms that thesis. 9)

Scott, like Newman, also calls attention to the facts that indicate a very detailed psychological warfare – black propaganda campaign was part of the plan to kill the President, a false attempt to blame the conspiracy to kill JFK on Cuban Castro Communists, which formed the basis of what Scott calls the “Phase One” cover story that was officially and popularly rejected. Yet it continues today as an “active measure” with former CIA agents Brian Latell and Bob Baer – along with their media assets Gus Russo and Phil Shenon – actively promoting this failed thesis that Castro was behind the Dealey Plaza operation. Because this aspect of the plan failed, like all failed covert intelligence operations, it gives us an insight into those responsible. 10)

John Newman also recognized this – and wrote about it, as I have done. Newman wrote that “The plot to assassinate President Kennedy was designed to deceive both people in the government and the public at large. A convincing trail of evidence was established to make it appear that the Kennedy brothers’ plan to overthrow Castro had been turned around against them by Fidel himself, resulting in the assassination of President Kennedy.” 11)

Most successful covert intelligence operations never make the news, only those that fail, like the Bay of Pigs and Watergate, get public exposure, and the part of the plot to kill JFK that failed was the psych war aspect to blame Fidel Castro for the conspiracy, which therefore gives us some clear insight in to those responsible for the plan. (See: The Part of the Plot that Failed.  12)

MO –MODUS OPERANDI

British Major General Llewellyn W. Atcheriey developed the Modus Operandi – MO system of classification of criminals by their common traits – which leads us to the MO of what happened at Dealey Plaza. The assassination must be recognized as a Covert Intelligence Operation. (See - Modus Operandi 13)
Three Time - 3X HITS 

In the course of my research, while reading the House Select Committee on Assassination (HSCA) reports, I came up with my own research technique I call Three Time Hits.

Besides the standard research technique utilized by all journalists and investigators covering complicated stories in starting a name and subject file and chronology, I began to start files on certain subjects when they came up in three separate areas – which first led me to focus on Collins Radio, then the Pan Am Bank of Miami, and more recently Looking Glass and Silver Dollar. 14)

COP PROFILE

Covert Operational Personality Profile (COP)

When the Secret Service commissioned the Exceptional Case study of those individuals who have assassinated presidents or attacked them, they came up with psychological profiles – but neglected to include one significant category – the covert intelligence operator.

Being from New Jersey, where such criminal profiling originated, I defined the Covert Operational Personality Profile (COP) that more clearly fits known or alleged political assassins. 15)

PART 1 – THE CIA/MAFIA PLOTS TO KILL CASTRO

As Bill Turner said decades ago, we knew then that the mechanism of death was already established and in place to kill Castro – and was redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza, and we find a number of investigators and suspects who call attention to the significance of the CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro and their association with the murder of the President.

SAM STERN

Warren Commission attorney Samuel Stern (who is still alive and practicing in Washington D.C.), told the HSCA that if they had known about the CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro they would have looked into that area thoroughly. Stern stated that had the Commission learned of the CIA-Mafia conspiracies to assassinate Fidel Castro, “we would have gone much more into Cuba, the CIA, and the Mafia. We would have had a whole host of new avenues calling for investigation. And we would have obviously had to develop some new sources of information – other than the agency.”  16)

Well just because they didn’t know about it and didn’t look into it, that doesn’t mean we can’t.

DAVID ATLEE PHILLIPS – Oswald used the same plan they had devised to kill Castro.
Over drinks in Washington, Phillips told the veteran Congressional investigator Kevin Walsh that, “My private opinion is that JFK was done in by a conspiracy, likely including American intelligence officers.”
When he died on 7th July, 1988, Phillips left behind an unpublished manuscript. The novel is about a CIA officer who lived in Mexico City. In the novel the character states: "I was one of those officers who handled Lee Harvey Oswald... We gave him the mission of killing Fidel Castro in Cuba... I don't know why he killed Kennedy. But I do know he used precisely the plan we had devised against Castro. Thus the CIA did not anticipate the president's assassination, but it was responsible for it. I share that guilt." 17)

 JOHN ROSELLI and JACK ANDERSON

Mafia syndicate mobster John Roselli told Washington columnist Jack Anderson that he was recruited by the CIA to kill Fidel Castro during the Eisenhower administration, and after a number of attempts to poison Castro failed, Roselli assisted a team of anti-Castro Cuban commandos run out of the CIA’s JMWAVE station in Miami assigned to infiltrate Cuba and kill Castro.  

While both William Pawley and Clare Booth Luce also supported some of the JMWAVE maritime commandos – Roselli’s team was the one trained by U.S. Army Ranger Captain Edward Roderick at a sniper’s training base in a remote area called Point Mary, off Key Largo, Florida.

After James O’Connell, Roselli’s CIA case officer was William Harvey, head of Task Force W., that set the policies for the covert missions run out of the JMWAVE station. At Roselli’s request, Harvey and JMWAVE chief of station Ted Shackley oversaw the delivery of a U-Haul trailer full of CIA supplied arms, ammunition and explosives to Roselli’s team.

Roselli said that the last mission his team conducted was in March, 1963, the results of which were unknown to him, but he never saw them again. After Harvey was fired by RFK as head of Task Force W. and appointed CIA chief of station in Rome, he returned to meet with Roselli for one last time in June, 1963. They met in Florida, had dinner at a swanky restaurant and stayed at a first class hotel, the bill paid by Harvey with funds dedicated to the HT/RIFLE Castro assassination account.

As Anderson reported, “There were four more assassination attempts, the plotters were smuggled into Cuba with high-powered rifles. The last assassination squad, Roselli heard, made it to a Havana rooftop before they were caught….This was around March 1, 1963. Then the project was abandoned. Roselli saw (his CIA case officer William) Harvey for the last time in June, 1963. Five months later, Lee Harvey Oswald gunned down President Kennedy in Dallas. Oswald had been active in the pro-Castro movement. Shortly before that dreadful day in Dallas, Oswald had made a mysterious trip to Mexico where he visited the Cuban embassy. The Warren Commission found no evidence, however, that Oswald was in the hire of Havana…..Roselli made no apology for his CIA role. U.S. authorities call him a mobster. He regards himself as a patriot.” 18)

So in retrospect, we can say with some authority that the CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro were intimately entwined with the assassination of President Kennedy – as former FBI agent Bill Turner, former Warren Commission attorney Sam Stern, former CIA officer David Atlee Phillips and mobster John Roselli all attest. 

They are not silly conspiracy theorists, but serious investigators and a number of key players involved in the operations.

JMWAVE

Former CIA officer Rolf Mowatt-Larrsen - once the CIA chief of station in Moscow concluded that if the CIA was involved in the assassination of Presdient Kennedy, that involvement probably stemmed from the JMWAVE station, and he names Jacob Easterline as a CIA officer capable of being the mastermind of the plot. Easterline was one of the top planners of the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, and was later assigned to disolve the JMWAVE station after the assassination. 19)

General Brute Krulak assigned U.S. Army Ranger Captain Bradley Ayers to train anti-Castro Cubans at JMWAVE, along with another Ranger, Captain Edward Roderick. While Ayers trained the Cubans in small boat maneuvering and infiltration and exfiltration techniques at a remote base in the Everglades called Pirates Lair, Roderick worked with a sniper team at Point Mary, off Key Largo, that was affiliated with Colonel “Rawlins” – John Roselli – the Pathfinders.

After leaving the Army, because he didn’t officially work for the CIA and didn’t sign a secrecy agreement, Ayers wrote a book that wasn’t pre-approved by the CIA – “The War that Never Was,” which was published in Indiana by Bobs-Merrell, a school book firm that reportedly had an office in the Dallas Texas School Book Depository. The attorney for Boobs-Merrell, who edited Ayers’ manuscript, was William Harvey, the former CIA officer who ran Task Force W and was fired by Robert Kennedy for sending the Pathfinders into Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. Harvey edited out the names of a number of JMWAVE officials mentioned by Ayers, including Gordon Campbell, the director of the Maritime operations. 20)

Years later Ayers wrote another book, “The Zenith Secret,” that does mention Gordon Campbell, as well as Roderick and Roselli, and takes its name from the Zenith Technological Services – the cover companay for JMWAVE at the University of Miami, South Campus. 21)

THE TRAINERS

Taking a cue from Ayers, I thought it wise to take a closer look at the CIA trainers – and have identified a number of them who come into play.

At the top of the list is Paul Linebarger, who Joseph Smith, in his book “Portrain of a Cold Warrior,” describes as the primary CIA educator in covert intelligence operations. The former Army officer who wrote the official text book on propaganda and psychological warfare, Linebarger was a college professor who gave private classes in covert intelligence procedures and techniques at his Washington D.C.  home. Among his students Linebarger was especially proud of E. Howard Hunt and Edwin Lansdale, who he said “had black minds.” 22)

As Smith explains, Linebarger divided propaganda into different categories, with black propaganda being a very specific intelligence operation, one that perports to originate from the enemy – and is known as Black Propaganda. Besides his own book “Propaganda” – Linebarger used David Maurer’s “The Big Con,” as an example of good covert intelligence operations. Maurer, a Kentucky professor of linguistics, wrote about his unique study of the lingo and slang of confidence men, con artists and swindlers, and was the basis for the movie “The Sting.”

At a retirement party for CIA officer Haveland Smith, journalists Thomas Powers (“Intelligence Wars”) met General Odom, the former head of the National Security Agencey (NSA) and U.S. Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI), whose officers are all over Dealey Plaza. When Powers asked Odom, what makes a good case officer? Odom replied – “the movie ‘The Sting’,” clearly indicating he had taken Linebarger’s course that included “The Big Con” as part of its curriculum. 23)

Linebarger worked closely with General Edwin Lansdale in the Phillipines, where he recruited Napoleon Valeriano, who was trained in the covert black arts by Linebarger.

According to the official CIA History of the Bay of Pigs, Lansdale brought Napoleon Valeriano to Guatemala to train the anti-Castro Cuban commando crusaders in guerilla warfare. But rather late in the game, Lansdale and Valeriano were removed from the program, and the plan changed from the infiltration of small teams on the east coast of Cuba near the mountains where they would conduct a guerilla war against Castro, and instead went with a full fledged amphibious landing, at the Bay of Pigs. Those two changes in plans doomed the invasion before it could even land and the original planner – Jacob Esterline and the U.S. Marine officer responsible, tried to resign, but were persuaded to stay by Richard Bissell.  24)

Lansdale then became head of the Kennedy administration’s covert Cuban action program called Mongoose, while William Harvey was brought in to run the Cuban Task Force W out of the basement of the new CIA headquarters in Langley and took over the case officer responsibilities for John Roselli. 25)
Charles Ford was Princeton student from Atlantic City, N.J. when he joined the Army at the start of World War II and was assigned to the Office of Strategic Services. The OSS, under Gen. William Donovan, were originally trained by the British MI6 – with James Jesus Angleton being personally coached in the covert arts by British-Soviet double agent Kim Philby. 26)

Donovan adpoted the British model of training and issued training manuals to all OSS officers, and the same training manuals were adapted by the CIA for the training of the Cubans. 27)

After intense OSS training Charles Ford was sent on a special mission to China with another OSS officer – J. Walton Moore, who should become the head of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Division office for many years, while Ford was assigned to the CIA office of training, where he rose up the ranks over the years. Ford’s career remained in the Training Division except for one year when he was assigned to the Operations branch Cuban desk – Task Force W and JMWAVE. There he assumed a false Italian identity and was tasked with assisting Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, doing whatever he requested. 28)
In the course of his research for his series of books on the assassination, John Newman discovered that one of the two transcripts of HSCA interviews with Ford is missing, and that what was frequently said of Ford wasn’t true – he did not represent RFK in secret meetings with the Mafia to discuss the assassination of Castro. But he did meet with dissident Cubans on RFK’s behalf. 29)

As an Army intelligence officer Newman worked closely with General Odom at NSA, and has unmasked the CIA training officer described by Antonio Veciana as the man who took his CIA security oath and trained him in “psychological warfare,” Linebarger’s specialty. Veciana said that some of this training took place in an office in the Pan Am Bank building in Miami, Florida, which was one of the places that is mentioned more than three times in divergent areas of the JFK assassination story. 30)

After the assassination Charles Ford went back to the CIA’s Training Division, and was given custody of the CIA’s copy of the Zapruder Filim – that the Secret Service notes was to be used “for training purposes.”

NARROWING THE PLOTS TO KILL CASTRO

Cuban intelligence officer Fabian Escalante, who knew a lot about these matters, wrote a book that detailed over 600 attempts to kill Castro, but he didn’t include the ones that matter – the ones connected to the assassination of President Kennedy.

For starters there’s the plot to kill Castro that involved Antonio Veciana, that forced him to flee Cuba and led to the arrest of Sylvia Odio’s parents, who were in Cuban jails before the assassination when Sylvia wrote to her father on the Isle of Pines to tell him about the visit she received from Oswald and two Cubans. In jail Mr. Odio met John Martino, who visited Dallas to promote his book, “I Was Castro’s Prisoner,” and met Syliva and her sister and Father Walter McChann, the Catholic priest patron of the Dallas Cuban community. 31)

Besides the attempt to kill Castro that involved both Antonio Veciana and Sylvia Odio’s parents, there’s the matter of Dr. Rolando Cubella (AMLASH), who was one of the founders of the DRE and one of the Cuban military officers the CIA was trying to get to kill Castro and take over the government in a coup. 32)

THE CIA’S “DETAILED STUDY” OF VALKYRIE - Targeting disgruntled military officers to stage a coup.


As part of this project, we learn from the September 25, 1963 briefing of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, by the CIA’s Desmond FitzGerald that the CIA was “studying in detail” the failed July 20, 1944 German military officer’s plot to kill Castro that was to be adapted for use against Castro. This is all detailed in the memo prepared by Col. Walter Higgins, the adjunct to Gen. Brute Krulak – who was responsible for U.S. military support of CIA covert operations against Cuba. 33)

When Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC) director Jim Lesar recognized the significance of this memo, they cited it in an FOIA request for the CIA’s “detailed study” of the July 20th Valkyrie plot, but the CIA couldn’t find it or any CIA records at all. The CIA then belatedly claimed to have discovered just one document with a reference to it from 1954, blaming the failure of the plot on Communists. 34)

While the judge discounted the significance of these records and their connection to the CIA assassination plots to kill Castro and association with the assassination of President Kennedy, the AARC was granted an appeal of one aspect of the FOIA request for the records of the CIA’s search for the Valkyrie documents.

Oral arguments on this case were presented in Washington D.C. court with the AARC being represented by attorney Dan Alcorn. The three judges can take weeks or even months to come up with a decision.  35)

VALKYRIE at Dealey Plaza

Even without the CIA’s records that they have apparently lost or destroyed, we can study the July 20, 1944 Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler and see how it was to be adapted for use against Castro and possibly was redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza.

For starters, the CIA could have asked three key players in the Valkyrie drama who they were already working closely with – former CIA director Allen Dulles, his OSS assistant Mary Bancroft and a key player in the plot – Gestapo officer Hans Bernd Gisivious, one of the few of the primary participants to survive. Gisivious survived with the assistance of Dulles and Bancroft Bancroft went on to translate Gisivious’ history of the Third Reich. A newspaper reported that Dulles and Gisivious met for an anniversary dinner in Washington D.C. on July 20, 1954, the tenth anniversary of the failed plot to kill Hitler. 36)

As we review the story of the failed July 20, 1944 Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler, we can see how the CIA would attempt to use the same strategy against Castro, and it appears it was use against JFK at Dealey Plaza.
There are five basic aspects of the Valkyrie plot that fall into place in Dallas beginning with the use of standard covert intelligence operational techniques – i.e. - nothing is written down so there are no written records, etc., and the operation is given a code name that only direct participants know – Valkyire. 37)

Valkyrie are legendary Norse fairies that float above a battlefield and chose who will live and die, and is the operational code name for what became the July 20, 1944 coup attempt and failed assassination of Hitler. The plan was devised by high level German military officers who recognized that Germany would be totally destroyed if they didn’t kill Hitler, take over the government and surrender to the Western Allies.  

A second part of the Valkyrie plan that was adapted for use against Castro and redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza was the encouragement of disgruntled high level military officers to commit to the plan and exercise a coup to take over the government.

At his September 25, 1963 briefing of the Joint Chiefs of Staff the CIA’s Desmond Fitzgerald said this was part of the “psychological” operations, and that while they had identified some disgruntled Cuban military officers they were not confident enough to communicate with each other. While that may have been the case among the Cuban military officers, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff were united in their dissatisfaction with President Kennedy. 38)

A third key aspect of the Valkyrie plan was to get the approval of the victim, and Col. Von Staufenberg drew up the Valkyrie plan in such a way that it did get the approval and signature of Hitler. As it was explained to Hitler, the Valkyrie plan was a “continuity of government” plan that would only be put into action in the case of an emergency – the example given was that of a slave labor revolt that required the securing of key government buildings and media outlets. Not mentioned to Hitler that his own death would also kick in the operation. 39)

The forth aspect of the Valkyrie plan that was adapted to the assassination of President Kennedy was the use of the “Home Guard” to carry out the “boots on the ground” tasks that had to be accomplished. In the United States what they called the “Home Guard” in Germany is the state National Guard or Army Reserves. 40)

Many of the Dallas Police officers and most of the Dallas Police Special Services intelligence unit were also members of the National Guard, including Capt. George Lumpkin, driver of the Pilot car that proceeded a mile ahead of the motorcade looking for possible trouble, and in the back seat included Col. Whitmeyer, head of all of the U.S. Army Reserve units in North Texas.

When they got to Dealey Plaza Lumpkin pulled off to the sidewalk at Houston and Main to tell the traffic patrolman there that the motorcade was only a mile and a few minutes behind, also telling the Sixth Floor sniper sixty feet above them.

After going to Parkland Hosptial, Lumpkin returned to Dealey Plaza where he met TSBD superintendent Roy Truly. Even though Truly had seen Oswald in the second floor lunchroom with DPD motorcycle officer Marion Campbell within two minutes of the last shot, and knew he wasn’t the shooter, Truly falsely told Lumpkin that Oswald was the only missing employee – and gave Lumpkin a piece of paper with Oswald’s name and Mrs. Paine’s Irving address. Lumpkin and Truly then went to the sixth floor where Homicide Captain Will Fritz was inspecting the recently discovered rifle. Lumpkin gave Fritz Oswald’s name and address. Fritz then went across the street where he met privately with Sheriff Bill Decker, a meeting of which there is no record as to what they discussed. Back at his office Fritz ordered some of his men to go out to Irving and get Osawld – but they said “There he sits” – having just been arrested at the Texas Theater.

In the hours after the assassination the U.S. Army Reserve officers serving with the Dallas Police made major moves –especially Capt. Gannaway and Jack Revell of the Special Services unit and Col. Jack Crichton, head of the 488th Army Reserves Intelligence unit that oversaw the Dallas Emergency Communications bunker below the Science Museum at the Texas Fairgrounds, where the DPD Special Services Unit also had their headquarters. Because the DPS SSU ran undercover informants, they maintained their office outside City Hall so the informants wouldn’t be recognized.

So just as the German Home Guard were to carry out the Valkyrie plan, the US Army Reserve officers in Texas played major roles in the assassination story as it unfolded.

Then another key aspect of the Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler, that was to be adapted by the CIA for use against Castro – but redirected to JFK at Dallas, was to blame the assassination and conspiracy on communists – Castro Cuban Communists – that they did through Oswald. 41)

As Sen. Richard Schweiker (R. Pa.) of the Church Committee said, “there are the fingerprints of intelligence” all over the assassination of President Kennedy and it’s cover-up, and these five “fingerprints of intelligence” clearly place the Valkyrie plot in Dealey Plaza as the strategic backbone of the operation. 42)

While Valkyrie may have been the basic strategy that was adopted and adapted – Pathfinder was the much more specific tactical plan to kill Fidel Castro that was redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza.

And because the CIA can no longer find any records of their “detailed study” of the Valkyrie plot to be used against Castro, it fits Peter Dale Scott’s “Negative Template” thesis that there are no longer any official records of the most significant events.

PATHFINDER

Englishman Malcolm Blunt, who has spent more time roaming the JFK Records Collection at the National Archives than anyone I know, first provided me with the Pathfinder documents he uncovered. 43)

The “Pathfinder” operation would have gone the way of Jimmy Hoffa, as all documentary records of it disappeared within the purged CIA files, if it wasn’t for three – not one, or two, but three (actually eight) NPIC technicians who blew the whistle when they learned that Congress was interested in the CIA plots to kill Castro and came forward with their information.

According to the CIA no one there today heard of an operation called “Pathfinder,” and they have no records of anything called “Pathfinder,” except for one reference in a file devoted to Watergate burglar Frank Sturgis, who was heavily involved in Cuban activities, but wasn’t an agent or operative of the CIA, but rather US Air Force Intelligence. 44)

Though its significance was not recognized at the time, we first learned about the Pathfinder files from the Congressional records released under the JFK Act of 1992, when it was recorded on the official record that in 1975 Dino Brugioni of the NPIC informed the CIA top brass that three NPIC technicians who were assigned to the Miami, anti-Castro Cuban JMWAVE station recalled working on the PATHFINDER program that was an assassination plan to kill Castro. 

When the Congressional Church Committee was investigating the CIA-Mafia plot to kill Castro, these NPIC technicians, assigned to the JMWAVE station, came forward to make their superiors aware of two CIA contingency plans to kill Castro and one to kill his brother Raoul.

We first learned about Pathfinder from our old friend at NPIC - Dino Brugioni, who we know from his books on Photo Fakery and the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his work on the Zapruder film at NPIC, on the weekend of the assassination, making the first set of briefing board.

In this MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD, dated 21 March 1975,
It is noted that:

1)      On 19 March, Dino A. Brugioni, Chief, Western Geographic Division (NPIC), informed me (CIA Operational Division Chief) that three personnel assigned to his division had told him that while serving at JMWAVE, Miami, Florida or in the Imagery Analysis Service in Washington during the 1960’s, they had heard references to assassination plans on Fidel Castro.

2)      On 20 March, I met with the following NPIC personnel who had either served in the Imagery Analysis Service or at JMWAVE on Cuban related problems: Gordon Duvall, Earl Shoemaker, Tom Helmke, Bruce Barrett, Reyes Ponce, George Arthur, Eugene Lydon, and William Hanlon. The purpose of this meeting was to ascertain whether their participation was related to case officer generated materials or bona fide operations. 45)

 [Note: that's eight witnesses, not three]. 

3)      There appeared to be two plans involving Fidel Castro and an incident that may have been related to Raul Castro…….

4)      The incident involving Raul Castro was not a formalized plan. It consisted of a paramilitary raid on Santiago de Cuba harbor. There was a rumor at JMWAVE that, while exiting the harbor, Raul Castro’s home had been fired upon by a paramilitary case officer named “Rip” Robertson. 46)

5)      To the best of my knowledge these facts represent the totality of any participation by our personnel in these matters. We have no further knowledge that the Fidel Castro operation ever advanced beyond the planning stage. 

SIGNED Edward S. Cates, Chief, Imagery Exploitation Group, NPIC

While it may not have officially  “advanced beyond the planning stage” and was not implemented against the original target - Fidel Castro, Pathfinder was an off-the-shelf tactical plan that could have, and I believe was redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza, and further analysis can prove me right or wrong,

It appears that “Rip” Robertson’s ride-by shoot up of Raul Castro’s home had already taken place, and the two Fidel Castro operations were formalized into distinct plans that, according to the Imagery Exploitation Group at NPIC, didn’t advance beyond the planning stage.

And there were plans to kill Castro known to the NPIC techs – two of them specifically.

According to this NPIC chief the plans involving Fidel, to the knowledge of our people were: 

(a)    A folder stored in the Photo interpretation area at JMWAVE contained materials relating to a plan to assassinate Castro in the Bay of Pigs resort area where he maintained a yacht and was known to vacation. The plan, possibly with the code word PATHFINDER, apparently had been disapproved and was not under active consideration at the time. Our people did not participate actively in the plan in any regard. 47)

(b)   While assigned to the Imagery Analysis Service, a number of our photo interpreters supported Carl Jenkins of the DD/P concerning a plan to assassinate Castro at the DuPont Varadero Beach Estate, east of Havana. Castro was known to frequent the estate and the plan was to use a high powered rifle in the attempt. The photo interpretation support was restricted to providing annotated photographs and line drawings of the estate. To our knowledge, this plan also was never implemented. 48)

In a follow up report from Joseph Seltzer at the CIA dated 8 May 1975, in response to the NPIC inquiries regarding Carl Jenkins and PATHFINDER, Seltzer wrote:  49)

SUBJECT: Assassination Plans Against Castro
REFERENCE: Memorandum for the Record dated 21 March 1975 from Mr. Cates, NPIC 

1.      On receipt of reference memorandum, we reviewed the official folder on Mr. Carl Jenkins, a retired Agency employee, and asked the Directorate of Operations for any available information on PATHFINDER. Both efforts were fruitless – no one in the Directorate of Operations recognized the cryptonom PATHFINDER. 

2.      In our search of other files in connection with other staff activities, we came, just by chance, a reference to Pathfinder in an FBI memorandum dated 20 January 1961 concerning Frank Anthony Sturgis. We are unable to offer any speculation, reasonable or otherwise, on its significance in this memorandum or in the NPIC memorandum.

Because these were "in house" agency communications between one division of the CIA and another, and was not shared with the Church Intelligence Committee, the "official folder on Mr. Carl Jenkins" that was reviewed was not subject to the JFK Act and is not in the JFK Collection at the National Archives and available to the public. And because Jenkins is still alive, it is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). But because Jenkins is still alive, we can and will try to interview him. 50)

Three years later, on June 20, 1978, the second chief counsel to the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) G. Robert Blakey, wrote to Mr. Scott Brekenridge, Principal coordinator between the HSCA and the Office of Legislative Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, asking a series of requests for documentary records. 51)

“In connection with its investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of President Kennedy, the House Select Committee on Assassinations requests access to the following information:…..6.      Any and all documents concerning or referring to OPERATION PATHFINDER, including all indices…..”

Signed: Sincerely, G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director HSCA

On 14 July, 1978, Marvin L. Smith, Chief, Operations Group, responded to the HSCA Requests of 20 June 1978. 53)

“A.    (S) An intensive search of the files and indices of this Directorate revealed the following information on the individuals and organizations listed in the referenced request, which, unless otherwise indicated, is being forwarded to your Office. Since birthdates were not provided on the individuals, some of the information may not pertain to them…..

6.      Operation Pathfinder – No information

C.     (U) It has been determined that none of the individuals listed in the referenced request has been the subject of an FOIA or PA request.”

SIGNED Marvin L. Smith

To dispense with the Raoul plot first, it was, according to the NPIC technicians, a “drive by” maritime speed boat attack on a Cuban North Shore estate where Fidel Castro’s brother Raoul ostensibly lived, hoping he was in residence, and that mission may have even taken place. The NPIC JMWAVE techs said that “Rip Robertson,” one of only two American to go ashore at the Bay of Pigs, was connected to this operation. 53)

The other two contingency plans are much more relevant to the assassination of President Kennedy, and according to the JMWAVE NIPIC techs, was given the code name PATHFINDER.

The NPIC technicians said that they not only assisted in the contingency plan for “PATHFINDER,” supplying photos and maps of the target areas, but the PATHINDER files were kept in the NPIC section of the JMWAVE station, rather than in the station’s Operational Files, where they would normally be kept. (See: 48)

According to the NPIC technicians stationed at JMWAVE, PATHFINDER was a contingency plan to kill Castro with high powered rifles when he drove by in an open jeep near the Bay of Pigs, which apparently became somewhat of a tourist attraction and resort area after the failed invasion in April 1961. It was reported that Castro kept a boat docked there. 

While the PATHFINDER plan was, according to the NPIC techs, “disapproved by higher authority” (aka JFK and RFK), another, similar plan was devised to kill Castro in a sniper attack when he drove by in an open jeep to Xandau, the former North Shore Dupont estate, once owned by the Delaware Dupont family, but frequented by Castro near Varadero on the north Shore. 54)

“I was given a weapon… a beautiful German bolt-action rifle with a powerful telescopic sight, all neatly packed in a custom-made padded carrying case… a box of ammo, twenty rounds. I was told that I wouldn't have to sight the rifle, as it had already been zeroed in. Apparently the resistance had obtained a building facing a location that Castro frequented at the time....We were supposed to debark onto a Cuban boat near Varadero Beach, an area I knew from my childhood. From there we would be taken to rendezvous with members of the anti-Castro resistance…..We would be provided a safe house, then move to the room where we'd be able to shoot Fidel….”

- Bay of Pigs Pathfinder Felix Rodriguez  55)

GENE WHEATON

Then along came Gene Wheaton, a former policeman, Marine, Air Force and Army investigator who received a presidential citation for his security work in the Middle East.

When the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) was established Wheaton contacted the chairman Judge John Tunheim and said he might have some information that could lead the Review Board to relevant JFK assassination records. He was contacted by a ARRB attorney and met with her in Washington, D.C., gave them dozens of documents and explained to them how he came to know deep background on the assassination from Carl Jenkins, his partner in a national cargo airlines that was owned by the CIA. 56)

Although Weaton didn’t know that the NPIC employees had already dropped a dime on Jenkins, Wheaton explained that he learned details of the assassination from Jenkins and the Cubans he trained at JMWAVE over the course of their association over years, as he lived at Jenkins house when he worked in Washington D.C.

Although the ARRB did not follow up on the leads Wheaton provided, he did talk on camera to two documentary film makers, the first one from Minnesota who was more interested in Wheaton’s knowledge of the Iran-Contra deal sell military missiles to Iran to free American hostages and financially support CIA covert intelligence operations that Congress refused to approve. 57)

The second filmed interview with Wheaton done in 2005 by William Matson Law deals with his knowledge of the assassination of JFK and was shown at the JFK Lancer conference in Dallas that year, but few took serious notice until after Wheaton died, and excerpts were more recently posted on the internet. 58)

In that second interview Wheaton is quoted as saying: “The straight story is that there was a CIA fronted program to assassinate Castro and Carl (Jenkins) was in charge of training the Cubans in Miami to assassinate Castro and it was paid for by the CIA. They would go from Texas down to Mexico and take some convertibles and things into the hills and rocky areas and set watermelons up in the back seat and they had what they called a triangulation shooting team. And they were according to THEM, THEY were the ones that diverted the Castro funds and training for their own agenda to snuff Kennedy. It was a paid element and they were CIA people. They were training to assassinate Castro, but if you are trained to assassinate one person, you can use that training to assassinate anybody with that same training. That’s what they were using – the paid training program to get Castro. The Cubans, because of the imprisonment of those guys and JFK backing off at the last moment in support of the Bay of Pigs invasion, they were still angry, still are to this day. There was another clique above them that was worried about Kennedy not increasing the program for escalating the hostilities in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. So at an extremely high level, I’m talking about the political elite level, the shakers and movers of the country – the top guys in the Pentagon and White House, did not want Kennedy to shut down that war because they were just getting it warmed up and wanted to escalate.”

Wheaton: “Chi Chi (Quintero) was a shooter, he was trained by I.F. Harper…Jenkins was from Louisiana and was the CIA’s liaison with  Carlos Marcello, the mafia boss connected in with Sam Giancana and John Roselli who are on the public record as being part of that crowd – the Mafia guys they say were connected to the Kennedy assassination. …I had been working with Sen. (Hugh) Scott (Rep. Pa.) to see if we could get the record set straight on the Kennedy assassination – get total immunity for those involved. I talked to Senator Scott about it and I told them if you guys just tell the whole straight story you can get immunity.”

“Chi Chi and Carl Jenkins were in charge of the main team.  Carl Jenkins was training Chi Chi (Quintero) and several other shooters, about five of them – and I.F. Harper helped train these guys to assassinate Castro. According to THEM, they just went off and decided to get their revenge on Kennedy for his failure to support the invasion of Cuba.”

“Lee Harvey Oswald was just a stooge that Carl and his friends…... Carl you see, back in the early 1950s, when he came back from Korea, he formed the first US Marine Corps Reserve unit in New Orleans. Carl was a Captain in the Marine Corps, and a CIA officer. He formed the first US Marine Corps reserve unit in New Orleans, La., and he was the CIA liaison between CIA Headquarters and Carlos Marcello, the organized crime boss there.”

“Lee Harvey Oswald was a young guy, and because of Carl’s connection with the US Marine Corps reserve, and his involvement in the CIA, helped recruit Lee Harvey Oswald while he was a Marines. Keep in mind this is not somebody sitting down and telling me this, this is over months and years of talking with them and them talking to each other in my presence. It was obvious Lee was a stooge that they set up. You always have what they call an 'Operational Security Plan' for deniability, - something that they put in the plan when they put the covert operation in place.”

Wheaton also gave a number of relevant documents to the Minnesota film maker, who posted them on line – including a copy of Carl Jenkins’ passport and a vita – resume that Jenkins himself had written that itimizes his role in the CIA assassination plots to kill Castro. 60)

In the early 1960s Jenkins notes that he was “Chief of Base for Cuban project, first in Florida, then in Guatemala; responsible for selection and training of cadre, assignment of officers for invasion brigade, maritime infiltration and operational management of small teams and individual agents.” In the mid-1960s Jenkins wrote that he was a “Senior Operations Adviser for a still-sensitive Cuban project” with a handwritten notation on the side that reads: “Castro assassination program.”

In the 1980s Soldier of Fortune Magazine wrote an article about the CIA trainers involved with the Contras in Nicaragua, among them the “legendary” CIA trainer John “I.F.” Harper, who was training the Contras to fight the Sandinistas just as he had trained the anti-Castro Cubans in the 1960s. 60)

Just as the there are no records today of the CIA’s “detailed study” of the Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler, to be used against Castro, the Pathfinder Files have also fallen into Peter Dale Scott’s “Negative Template,” but at least we know what was in it as we have the NPIC employees descriptions of it. We also know that the Pathfinder file was delibaratly kept in the NPIC section of the JMWAVE station instead of the Operational Files, where it belonged. Then we learn that the 1975 NPIC memo was burried in Frank Sturgis’ CIA Security File, where it was inadvertatedly discovered.

Then when the Assassinations Records Review Board (ARRB) went looking for these records in the early 1990s, a former NPIC secretary told them that sometime in 1964, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy ordered the NPIC records on the assassination to be boxed and sent to the Smithsonian Institute, rather than the National Archives, where they belong. 61)

So we have three distinct instances where the Pathfinder files were deliberately misfiled – and we are still trying to locate them.

CONCLUSION

As this is still a work in progress, there is no definitive conclusion, other than the leads presented are panning out, both in records at the National Archives and with interviews with the known participants.

One of the Pathfinders trained by Ayers, Roderick, Jenkins and Harper – Chi Chi Quintero, before he died, was asked about Wheaton’s allegations, and said he was only saying what he knew, and “If I were ever granted immunity, and compelled to testify about past actions, about Dallas and the Bay of Pigs, it would be the biggest scandal ever to rock the United States.” 62)

Both Carl Jenkins and John Harper are still alive, and have been located and attempts are being made to get them to tell what they know about these affairs.

In an email, Harper said Wheaton “was a two faced son of a bitch,” but he didn’t say he was lying. 63)

So as we proceed to research both the Valkyrie plan to kill Hitler that was being adapted by the CIA for use against Castro, and the Pathfinder plan to kill Castro with a high powered rifle as he rode in an open jeep, that I believe was redirected to JFK at Dealey Plaza, we can be confident that the assassination of the President will not forever remain a mystery, as we can and are figuring it out. 64)

If you can please support JFKCountercoup: Thank You.