Final Report of the ARRB:
Chapter 8 Compliance with the JFK Act by Government Offices
14. Department of the Navy
Chapter 8 Compliance with the JFK Act by Government Offices
14. Department of the Navy
After passage of the JFK Act, the Navy's Criminal
Investigative Service transferred, in 1994, the Office of Naval Intelligence
(ONI) records that had been maintained on Lee Harvey Oswald.6 In 1995, the
General Counsel of the Navy directed that a further review of the Navy's files
be undertaken pursuant to the JFK Act. This directive went to the Chief of
Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the Naval Criminal
Investigative Service, and the Naval
Historical Center .
The Navy identified no additional assassination records.
In early 1997, after the navy consulted with Review Board staff regarding categories of potentially relevant records, the General Counsel's office issued another search directive to the Chief of Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Secretary of the Navy's Administrative Division, and other components within the Navy. The Review Board asked the Navy to search for files of high-level officials of the Marine Corps, the Office of Naval Intelligence, and the Navy during the years 1959 through 1964.
The Navy conducted an extensive review of files, including a review of files from the Secretary of the Navy's Administrative Office, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Marine Corps. The Navy located miscellaneous documents relating to the Warren Commission and HSCA from files of the Administrative Office for the Secretary of the Navy as a result of this search. Among the records found was an unsigned copy of an affidavit by the Director of ONI, prepared at the time of the Warren Commission, stating that Lee Harvey Oswald was not used as an agent or informant by ONI.
The Navy confirmed that it had not, however, located the
1959 1964 files for the Director of ONI.
Office of Naval Intelligence.
The Review Board pursued the matter of ONI records separately. Accordingly, the Board requested that ONI submit its own certification of its compliance with the JFK Act. In its Final Declaration of Compliance, ONI stated that it conducted an extensive review of ONI records held at Federal Records Centers throughout the country. ONI did not identify any additional assassination records. ONI was unable to find any relevant files for the Director of ONI from 1959 to 1964.
The Review Board pursued the matter of ONI records separately. Accordingly, the Board requested that ONI submit its own certification of its compliance with the JFK Act. In its Final Declaration of Compliance, ONI stated that it conducted an extensive review of ONI records held at Federal Records Centers throughout the country. ONI did not identify any additional assassination records. ONI was unable to find any relevant files for the Director of ONI from 1959 to 1964.
ONI also acknowledged that there were additional ONI records
that were not reviewed for assassination records, but that these records would
be reviewed under Executive Order 12958 requiring declassification of
government records.
Rufus Taylor Director of Naval Intelligence June 1963 - May
1966
The Review Board requested that the Navy and ONI search for the records of Director of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral Rufus Taylor. The Review Board acquired a copy of an unsignedSeptember
21, 1964 , affidavit regarding Oswald that Taylor appears to have executed and forwarded
to Secretary of Defense McNamara. The affidavit states that that ONI never
utilized Lee Harvey Oswald as an agent or an informant. ONI did not locate
any files belonging to Taylor .
The Review Board requested that the Navy and ONI search for the records of Director of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral Rufus Taylor. The Review Board acquired a copy of an unsigned
No comments:
Post a Comment