Tom Fox/Staff Photographer
Local civic leaders including (from left) State Senator
Royce West, Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins and Dallas Mayor Mike
Rawlings attended the installation of Ronald E. Jones, mayor of Garland ,
as the 13th pastor of New Hope Baptist
Church last month.
Potential challenge suggests Dallas County DA Craig
Watkins could be vulnerable
By GROMER JEFFERS JR.
Staff Writer gjeffers@dallasnews.com
Published: 04
February 2013 11:03 PM
The announcement that a well-respected former judge is
considering challenging Craig Watkins in next year’s Democratic primary is
raising questions about whether the district attorney, who has built a national
profile, has become vulnerable at home in Dallas County.
Former state District Judge John Creuzot said recently he
was studying a run against Watkins, and last week, he criticized his potential
rival’s incorrect announcement that an arrest had been made in the killing of Kaufman
County prosecutor Mark Hasse.
Watkins later apologized for the error, blaming a faulty source.
But analysts say it will take a near-perfect campaign — and
a lot of luck — for Creuzot to wrestle the district attorney’s office away from
Watkins, even as Watkins’ standing with some Democrats starts to waver.
Watkins is still considered a hero by black and progressive
voters in Dallas , mainly because of
his work to exonerate those convicted of crimes they didn’t commit. Watkins,
elected in 2006, is also the first black district attorney ever elected in Texas .
“To most people out there, he’s doing fine,” said Dallas
political consultant Lorlee Bartos, a Democrat. “Things seemed to have calmed
down for him, but you never know what can happen.”
Michael Sorrell, the president of Paul
Quinn College
who has worked as a political consultant, says a Watkins-Creuzot showdown would
be a riveting campaign.
Creuzot is “incredibly well-respected and did a fine job as
a judge, but he’s also been a Republican,” Sorrell said. “How he answers that
question will dictate what kind of opponent he will be.”
Creuzot said he’s in the early stages of considering whether
to run for district attorney or develop a private law practice.
And Watkins, who has already declared he’ll run for a third
term in 2014, says he doesn’t believe anyone can beat him in a Democratic
primary or general election.
Democratic Party operatives and elected officials have been
silent about the potential showdown, avoiding public comments until Creuzot
makes his intentions clear.
Sen. Royce West, for instance, says he’s focused on the
legislative session in Austin and
has not talked to Watkins or Creuzot about 2014. West, a Dallas Democrat, is
influential in county politics.
And unlike in 2009, when top local Democrats quickly
mobilized to run Clay Jenkins against County Judge Jim Foster in the 2010
primary, no Democratic leader has publicly weighed in on the potential clash
between Watkins and Creuzot.
But Watkins has clashed with several Democrats during his
time as district attorney, and some potential 2014 judicial candidates worry
that he’ll be a drag on the countywide ticket.
But others say that Watkins is a strong asset and that a
contested primary would only hurt the party brand. Judges generally don’t make
public statements about politics in nonelection years.
Dallas County Republican Party Chairman Wade Emmert said the
local GOP has a candidate or two ready to challenge Watkins, though he declined
to give their names.
In 2010, Watkins won a narrow victory over Republican Danny
Clancy. Despite his national acclaim, he took only slightly more than 50
percent of the vote, the lowest total of any Democrat on the countywide ballot.
Still, it will be difficult for a Republican to beat a
Democrat in a countywide race here. That hasn’t happened since 2004.
Any serious challenge to Watkins has to come from another
Democrat, someone who could carry a credible argument about dumping a historic
incumbent to the Democratic base voters.
Creuzot, a pioneer of prison diversion programs, is seen as
someone who can raise money and talk from experience about efforts to ease
unnecessary incarcerations and close the revolving door between the streets and
prison.
In theory, Creuzot would put to the test whether Watkins’
“smart on crime” efforts have been successful, or whether minorities are still
being prosecuted and sent to jail at alarming rates.
Sorrell said Creuzot could not win a contest solely based on
his own ideas. He’ll have to hit the incumbent hard with criticism of his
tenure.
“He has to go at him,” Sorrell said. “It could be very
fascinating.”
Watkins has only $10,000 in his campaign account, according
to his latest disclosure reports. Though he can surely raise more money from
reliable Democratic donors, he doesn’t have the resources to scare off a
potential rival.
Then there are the headlines that have dogged Watkins
through the years.
Accusations that he was too slow to investigate the
questionable activities of former Dallas County Constables Jaime Cortes and
Derick Evans seemed to chase away some independent voters, but did nothing to
hurt Watkins with Democrats.
Since then, he’s been criticized for hiring Teresa Guerra
Snelson to lead his office’s civil division. The hiring came after Snelson paid
Watkins’ wife, political consultant Tanya Watkins, more than $88,000 for an
unsuccessful campaign for judge.
While ethics experts questioned the arrangement, it wasn’t a
major public concern for his Democratic Party base.
Robert Ashley, a southern Dallas
political analyst and radio talk show host, said Creuzot could become a
credible critic, but that Watkins was still one of the most influential
politicians in the area.
“To this point the criticism of Watkins has been viewed by
many as sour grapes,” Ashley said. “But Judge Creuzot does not have any
credibility gaps. He can become a valid, formidable candidate.”
“His primary opponent may be able to attack him in ways that
Danny and Republicans couldn’t,” Neerman said. “But if you’re trying to get to
hit the king, you better not miss.”
Follow Gromer Jeffers Jr. on Twitter at @gromerjeffers.
Dallas DA Craig Watkins to push for law allowing appeals
based on racial factors
Published: 21
January 2013 11:13 PM
“We don’t make a determination on
what we’re going to do based upon what other DAs are doing in the state. We’ve
never done that. We’re just going to keep pushing the envelope forward to make
justice work for the state of Texas ,
and Texas has an opportunity to
lead the country when it comes to what it means to be a prosecutor and what
justice is.” - Dallas
DA Craig Watkins
Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins said he plans
to advocate for a state law that would allow criminals to appeal their
conviction or sentence on the grounds that race was a factor.
The Racial Justice Act would be based in part on similar
laws passed in recent years in North Carolina and Kentucky and would apply, at
least initially, only in death penalty cases, Watkins said in an interview
Monday. Defendants would be allowed to present evidence from their case or
through general statistics to show that race was a significant factor in their
prosecution or sentence.
“Throughout history, race has unfortunately played a part,
an ugly part, in our criminal justice system,” Watkins said. “This is an
opportunity for us to address not only the past, and those individuals who are
still being affected by the disparities in treatment, but also in looking
forward to make sure that we don’t have those same disparities in our criminal
justice system.”
Watkins acknowledged a difficult fight for any such bill in
the heavily conservative Texas Legislature. But he said he sees a benefit in
floating the proposal now nonetheless because “even if it’s not passed, at
least we’ve started the conversation,” he said.
Watkins said he plans to discuss the idea with lawmakers and
hopes to have a bill filed in the next few months.
At least one prominent advocate for criminal justice
reforms, Innocence Project of Texas chief counsel Jeff Blackburn, said he was
skeptical.
“I think the chances of getting something like that done are
between slim and none,” Blackburn said. He added, “I
think that on a practical level, this kind of Legislature, you’ve got to be
tightly focused.”
State Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, a prominent criminal
justice advocate, said he would consider a bill.
“I am going to talk with some other lawmakers to see if we
can get bipartisan support for this initiative,” Ellis said through a
spokesman.
Watkins, who is midway through his second term, is the first
black elected district attorney in the state. The work of his administration to
exonerate wrongly convicted
According to the district attorney’s office, 28 of the 33
people who have been exonerated of crimes since 2001 are black.
Sentencing disparity
Academic studies have argued that a racial disparity in
sentencing exists. One 2008 study by a University of Denver professor concluded
that black defendants in Harris County, which includes Houston, were more
likely to get a death sentence than white defendants.
Blacks comprise 40 percent of Texas ’
nearly 300 death row inmates, while 11 percent of the state’s population is
black. Researchers caution, however, that such raw numbers don’t take into
account a number of factors.
Watkins said the law would increase the credibility of Dallas
County prosecutors in the eyes of
potential jurors. Without that credibility, he said, “it’s less likely that
we’ll be in position to convict the guilty and get the adequate punishment.”
The North Carolina Legislature passed a bill in 2009 that
allowed defendants to use statistics and other evidence. But after Republicans
won control of the Legislature the next year, lawmakers unsuccessfully tried to
repeal the bill. The Legislature last year barred many statistics from being
used, limiting defendants only to direct evidence that applied to their cases.
Conflicted
Watkins has long been conflicted about the death penalty,
which he opposed for much of his life. He revealed last year that his
great-grandfather was executed by the state and around the same time that he
said state legislators ought to review death penalty procedures to ensure the
punishment is fairly administered.
On Monday, he said his views on capital punishment are
“somewhat irrelevant.”
“I’m just of the opinion that if we’re going to seek it that
it has to be fairly administrated,” he said. “No matter where you come from,
what you look like, it has to be fairly administrated.”
Veteran defense attorney Brad Lollar has represented
defendants in 13 death penalty cases. He said he applauds the effort to address
the apparent disparity in the way capital punishment is handed down.
“That’s been a problem and that’s been an issue that we’ve
seen come up time and again here in Dallas
during the time that I’ve been practicing,” said Lollar, also a former chief
public defender for the county.
Lollar said it’s important “to keep the issue in the
forefront of people’s minds, perhaps to when they’re considering the death
penalty and the application of it. So, yeah, I’m all for it.”
Officials with the Texas District & County Attorneys
Association, the state prosecutors group, said they weren’t aware how
prosecutors felt yet about a potential act. But Watkins said he wasn’t
concerned if the idea would be unpopular with other prosecutors.
“We don’t make a determination on what we’re going to do
based upon what other DAs are doing in the state. We’ve never done that,”
Watkins said. “We’re just going to keep pushing the envelope forward to make
justice work for the state of Texas ,
and Texas has an opportunity to
lead the country when it comes to what it means to be a prosecutor and what
justice is.”
Staff writer Scott Goldstein,The Associated Press
No comments:
Post a Comment