GRANDMOTHER’S ON THE ROOF
From The Carlos Contract – A
Novel of International Terrorism (Macmillan, 1978)
by David Atlee Phillips:
“In addition to questioning the
wisdom of involving friends, Mack questioned his own actual ability
to outwit Carlos. Had his professional talents and determination
atrophied? Would he be a fool to enter the arena again?”
“And, more importantly, did he still
have the gift of perceiving when grandmother was on the roof?”
“Mack had once been given a memorable
bit of advice by a senior CIA officer and veteran Latin American
hand: ‘An important part of intelligence work is sensing, before
you have hard proof, that a critical development will occur. Call it
professional intuition, the conviction that a number of pieces, when
eventually assembled into enough of the entire puzzle, will
constitute a revelation that is vital. I always try to think of it in
terms of knowing when grandmother is on the roof.’”
As a way of explanation, “the older
officer then launched into a story which he identified as Brazilian
folklore, a ‘Portuguese story’ somewhat on the order of
yesterday’s Irish and today’s Polish jokes.”
“A Portuguese man living in Brazil,
Mack’s mentor had said, received a cable from his cousin in
Portugal, announcing the death of the family cat, a pet the immigrant
had been especially fond of. ‘Our beloved cat,’ the message said,
‘fell from our roof to her death in the street below.’”
“The immigrant wrote to his cousin in
Lisbon: ‘Do not send such a message again. I am a sensitive person;
I can’t stand shocks. Should such a thing happened again consider
my temperament and let me know gently, in stages. For example, you
should have sent a message saying, ‘The cat went up on the roof.’
Then, a few days later another, saying, ‘The cat went to the edge
of the roof.’ Then, finally, a letter with the bad news: ‘The cat
fell off the roof and died.’”
“Some months later the immigrant in
Brazil received another cable from his cousin. This time it read:
‘Grandmother just went up on the roof.’”
“`So that’s what you must look
for,’ Mack’s friend had told him. ‘That one new piece of
information, perhaps a single line in a report, some awareness which
gives you a funny feeling at the back of the neck – the suspicion
which suddenly becomes a conviction that something important is in
motion, that grandmother is on the roof.’”
One of David Atlee Philip’s mentors,
especially in regards to psychological warfare and black propaganda
operations, was Professor Paul Linebarger of the School for Advanced
International Studies at John Hopkins University.
Now John Hopkins is a good medical
school which I believe is based in Baltimore, but Linebarger
conducted his classes at his Washington D.C. home every Friday
evening, educating more than one generation of spies in the black
arts. Among his students were Joseph B. Smith, David Phillips, Ed
Lansdale and E. Howard Hunt.
In order to get to his class Linebarger
required his students to take precautionary, evasive measures before
arriving and after leaving the class.
That’s why I got off the train
suddenly outside Baltimore, because I want to check out two places –
Fort Detrich (MKULTRA) and Fort Meade (NSA), which I unobtrusively
cased out from a distance.
In any case, Linebarger wrote the
textbook, “Psychological Warfare – International Propaganda and
Communications,” (Arno Press, 1948, 1954, 1972, Duell, Sloan and
Pearce, N.Y.), which sets the tone for controlling the minds of the
masses by simply using the right message.
According to Linebarger: “Psychological
warfare, in the broad sense, consists of the application of parts of
the science called psychology to the conduct of war; psychological
warfare comprises the use of propaganda against the enemy, together
with such military operational measures as may supplement the
propaganda. Propaganda may be described, in turn, as organized
persuasion by non-violent means. War itself may be considered to be,
among other things, a violent form of persuasion….War is waged
against the minds, not the bodies of the enemy.”
The term “propaganda” stems from
the department of the Vatican which had the duty of propagating the
faith.
Specifically defined, “propaganda
consists of the planned use of any form of public or massproduced
communication designed to affect the minds and emotions of a given
group for a specific purpose, whether military, economic or
political. Military propaganda consists of the planned use of any
form of communication designed to affect the minds and emotions of a
given enemy, neutral or friendly foreign group for a specific
strategic or tactical purpose.”
Linebarger: “Propaganda is directed
to the subtle niceties of thought by which people maintain their
personal orientation in an unsuitable interpersonal world. Propaganda
must use the language of the mother, the schoolteacher, the lover,
the bully, the policeman, the actor, the ecclesiastic, the buddy, the
newspaperman, all of them in turn. And propaganda analysis, in
weighing and evaluating propaganda must be even more discriminating
whether the propaganda is apt to hit its mark or not.”
Using what Linebarger called the STASM
formula for spot analysis, propaganda can be distinguished by the
consideration of five elements : 1 – Source (including the media),
2 – Time, 3 – Audience, 4- Subject, 5 – Mission.
“This formula
works best in the treatment of monitored materials of which the
source is known. First point to note is the character of the Source –
the true source (who really got it out?), the ostensible source
9whose name is signed to it?); also the first use source (who used it
the first time?) and the second use source (who claims to be using it
as a quotation?). It is soon evident that the mere attribution of
source is a job of high magnitude. A systematic breakdown of the
STASM formula produces the following analysis outline: applicable to
any single propaganda item, civil or military, in war or peace,
spoken, visual or printed.”
There are five types of propaganda: 1
– Defensive, which maintains an accepted form of social action, 2 –
Offensive, which interrupts social action not desired, 3 –
Conversionary, which challenges allegiance, 4 – Divisive, which
splits aparts opposition components, and 5 – Consolidation, which
insures compliance of target community.
White propaganda is a press release,
Light propaganda is attributed to a friendly source, Medium to a
neutral government, and so on.
Black Propaganda, as compared to
White, Light, Medium and Dark-Grey propaganda, is by defination,
specifically attributed to the opposition and allegedly supports the
oppossition’s position.
“Black Propaganda is a fundamental
intelligence operation,” notes Linebarger, “because…it never
identifies its real source, and pretends to originate within or close
to the enemy.”
At the end of one of his classes, Joe
Smith quotes Linebarger as saying, “I hate to think what would ever
happen if any of you ever got involved in U.S. politics. These kinds
of dirty tricks must never be used in internal U.S. politics. The
whole system would fall apart.”
As an example of the application of
the STASM formula for the analysis of propganda, I will provide what
I immediately recognized as a Black Prop Op in action when I read the
headline of the March 12, 1981 Philadelphia Daily News: “Castro
Plot to Murder Reagan.”
“Grandmother’s on the Roof!” I
said to myself even before I read the article by R. H. Boyce,
Scripps-Howard News Service, which I will post separately.
xxxxyyyz
No comments:
Post a Comment