FIDEL CASTRO AND THE
KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
CARL FRANCIS TAGG
MA 1982
ABSTRACT
This thesis examines the allegation that Fidel Castro was
involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. A review of
Cuban-American relations during the Kennedy Administration indicated that a
motive may have existed. Three United States
governmental investigations, the Warren Commission, the Church Committee and
the House Select Committee on Assassinations, considered this theory while
analyzing the available evidence in the fifteen years after the murder. After
the three separate investigations ended, all of their conclusions indicated
that Fidel Castro played no role in the assassination.
INTRODUCTION
On November 22,
1963 , in Dallas , Texas ,
John F. Kennedy was assassinated. One particular conspiracy theory which
received early attention was that Cuban leader, Fidel Castro, organized the
plot in retaliation for the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA )
covert activities and assassination attempts against him during Kennedy’s
administration from 1961 to 1963. The following chapters will focus on the
evidence which suggested a Castro conspiracy, along with contrary evidence,
drawn from data gathered by three United States
governmental investigations, to show that Fidel Castro was not involved,
directly or indirectly, in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
In analyzing the motives for the possibility of a
Castro-arranged plot, attention must be focused on what might have provoked
Castro to have wanted Kennedy assassinated. Chapter I will deal with the many
reasons Castro had for being furious with the United
States government and John Kennedy. The United
States government had overtly opposed
Castro’s rise to power and supported his rival, Fulgencio Batista, the Cuban
dictator that Castro was trying to overthrow. The United
States ’ embargo against Cuba
hurt the Cuban economy. In several of his speeches, John Kennedy took a strong
stand against communism in Cuba .
He vowed not to allow communist domination in the western hemisphere.
The Bay of Pigs invasion of April
1961 caused great concern for Castro even though he defeated the rebel
invaders. Castro might have blamed Kennedy for this obvious act of aggression
even though the plan originated during the Eisenhower Administration. The Cuban
missile crisis the following year brought the United
States and the Soviet Union
to the brink of a nuclear war. Castro became furious when Kennedy forced the
Soviets to remove the missiles while they did not even consult him about the
matter. Kennedy appeared to have won the confrontation.
Raids by anti-Castro Cubans against Cuba
from American soil added to Castro’s concern and problems. These raids
continued well into the fall of 1963 and beyond. Castro was irate about the
covert attempts made on his life by the CIA .
In the middle 1970s when the theory that Castro had retaliated against Kennedy
for these CIA attempts, the United
States government became concerned.
The pre-assassination period was full of tension between
Kennedy and Castro. Since the United States
government was attempting to overthrow Castro, a motive did exist for the Cuban
dictator to retaliate against Kennedy. However, by September 1963, leaders in
the United States
and Cuba began
to try and solve some of the differences between the two countries. Despite the
strained relationship between Kennedy and Castro, I have concluded that U.S.
attempts to overthrow Castro did not result in the death of Kennedy. Although
there were apparent motives for a Castro-arranged plot, I have found no grounds
for accepting this theory since the available evidence did not provide for a
persuasive argument.…
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
After my careful analysis of the question as to whether or
not Castro organized the murder of John Kennedy, I have concluded that the
Cuban leader as innocent of any wrongdoing in relation to the Kennedy
assassination. I reached this decision based on a thorough examination of the
evidence presented by the three United States
government investigations. A final persuasive opinion on this matte came from
G. Robert Blakey, the Counsel to the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
When asked about conspiracy theories related to the Kennedy
assassination he stated the following, “The first requirement of a good theory
is that it fit all the facts, not some of the facts, but all of the facts.”
According to Blakely, only one theory fit all of the facts and he figured that
elements of organized crime participated in the murder. 1
Blakely’s attention then switched to questions relating to Cuba
and Castro. He responded by announcing the following: if one mentioned Cuba ,
it did not mean Castro, and Castro was not insane or reckless.
In early 1981, Blakely and co-author Richard Billings wrote
a book called The Plot to Kill the President. The authors felt that organized
crime arranged the murder. The organization coming from the Marcello group in New
Orleans and the Trafficante forces in Tampa .
In a chapter on Castro’s possible involvement, they concluded that he was not
involved.
First they realized that by September 1963, the prospect of
improving Cuban-American relations seemed apparent. Second, they considered the
high risk that the United States
would have immediately invaded Cuba
and wiped out Castro. Third, there was no persuasive evidence to suggest that
Castro’s agents participated in the murder. Finally the Cuban Government’s
cooperation with the House Select Committee explained why Cuban complicity in
the assassination never took place. 3
Even though three United
States governmental investigations did not
find conclusive evidence that Castro arranged the murder of President Kennedy,
rumors may always exist that he did. The assassination remains today a controversial
issue. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln still remains argumentative today.
Even more than one hundred years after that event, conspiracy rumors continue
to be discussed. It is possible that fifty years from now books will still be
written on the Kennedy assassination and conspiracy theories involving Castro,
the Mafia, and anti-Castro Cubans, CIA
members, and others. The serious student of the Kennedy assassination must
evaluate the available evidence himself and make his own conclusions. The final
decision on Castro’s possible involvement is now up to the reader to determine.
[I will shortly post a link to the rest of this dissertation at Greg Parker's ReopenJFKassassination blog. ]
No comments:
Post a Comment