1978 Philadelphia Bulletin
Letters to the editor
Blood on history books
One of the members of the House of Representatives who is
“wisely reconsidering” the funding of the House assassinations committee is
Rep. Don Edwards (D. Calf.). He claims that it is “wrong, immoral and very
likely illegal” for the House investigators to use electronic devices on
witnesses and suspects (he calls them “citizens” suspected of lesser crimes.
The House of Representatives does not have the power to
prosecute even if the committee identifies co-conspirators. If given the funds,
however, the committee would have the power to find out some healthy truths
concerning those murky affairs and give future generations a more accurate
account of our history, even if we are not so terribly interested.
The committee should not give in to those who want to
protect the image of already discredited institutions and agencies. Political
interests should not control the direction of the investigation by limiting the
budget.
If this committee does not answer all of the questions it is
assigned to probe, you won’t be able to read through the blood on the history
textbooks.
William E. Kelly, Jr.
OpEd
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Opening Files on Assassination
As an independent free-lance journalist in California
to interview material witnesses to the assassination of President Kennedy that
the official investigators failed to question, I take exception to Richard M.
Mosk’s contention (“Distortions Will Continue No Matter What,” Commentary,
April 6) that “few of those who so easily accept conspiracy theories have never
bothered to review even the report.”
When the Warren
Report was issued in 1964, the 26 volumes of testimony and exhibits were only
published at the insistence of congressional commissioners. Many thousands of
students and independent researchers have not only read the report and
“supporting evidence,” but continue to follow up on leads and information subsequently
released and uncovered over the years. No, we don’t expect the files to contain
ay “smoking gun.” But it is the principle of open archives in an open society
that matters.
We do not need any government commission or report to tell
us the truth. We know basically what happened in Dealey
Plaza on November 22, 1963 , and the obstruction of
justice that has occurred.
The major distortions regarding the assassination stem from
the inadequacy of the official investigations, all of which were compromised
and ineffective.
Congressional legislation to release the House Select
Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) files was first introduced in 1981, but
never got out of committee because of the opposition from Louis Stokes and G.
Robert Blakey, the third chairman and second chief counsel of the HSCA.
Although two other bills have been introduced in this
Congress to release the J.F.K. files, Stokes and Blakey, with the assistance of
Mosk and David Belin, have authored their own lengthy bill, the one referred to
by Mosk.
So the individuals who have opposed the release of the files
for so long have co-authored this bill that, if passed and approved by the
President, will create yet another appointed commission to review the files and
determine if the public has the right to see them in our lifetime
We don’t need any more commissions or lies, just open the Archives.
William E. Kelly, Jr.
Co-founder Committee for an Open Archives (COA)
No comments:
Post a Comment