Dr. Cyril Wecht discusses forensic challenges of cold cases
By MILES LAYTON ,
Herald-Standard
UPDATED 6:39 PM EDT
Apr 06, 2013
1963: In Dallas , Texas ,
U.S. President John F.
Kennedy is assassinated and Texas Gov. John B. Connally is seriously wounded
when a sniper fires shots from the Texas School Book Depository at
the president's motorcade. Suspect Lee Harvey Oswald is later captured and
charged with the murder of both Kennedy and police officer J. D. Tippit, whom
he shot while fleeing the scene. Oswald would be shot two days later by Dallas
nightclub owner Jack Ruby while in police custody.
"You've got to be made to understand that you are a
scientist," he said. "You are not there for the prosecution or
defense. In a civil case, you are not there for the plaintiff or the defendant.
There is nothing wrong with arriving at opinions, being a strong adversary. I'm
not suggesting you play Mr. Wimp. Once you arrive at your opinions and
conclusions, be prepared to explain and to defend them in a very hard fashion.
You have to maintain objectivity in your approach initially to the case, your
methodology and your analysis," Wecht said.
The world-famous pathologist has worked on numerous cases in
his career, from those that have made headlines to those quiet tragedies known
only in the areas in which they occurred. A former Allegheny County Coroner,
Wecht still consults on most cases throughout the region involving an untimely
death or murder. He has written books and scores of articles about pathology.
Large posters of President John F. Kennedy adorn the walls
of Wecht's downtown office. Though an arrest was made, Wecht considers the
Kennedy assassination the ultimate cold case. He questions the evidence, how
the investigation was handled and the autopsy results. He doesn't accept the Warren
Commission's report that put forth the "magic bullet" theory.
"If you go with the Kennedy case and the Warren
Commission report, then it is not a cold case," he said. "But 85
percent of the American public feel that it is a cold case because when they
say they don't believe Lee Harvey Oswald did it, that he was the sole assassin,
that makes it a cold case."
Wecht described the Kennedy cold case as the hardest he has
ever studied. That's saying something coming from a man who has performed
thousands of autopsies and consulted on high-profile cases. Wecht wonders how a
bullet wound moved four inches up Kennedy's skull a few years after the
original examination of the body. He questions the government's evidence, such
as why Kennedy's brain is missing.
"I would say the Kennedy case is the hardest because
the federal government is involved. Have they lied, destroyed and hidden
evidence? I don't know," he said. "The president's brain -- is it
destroyed or is it hidden? I don't know. Photographs, X-rays and slides are
missing. Destroyed or hidden? You come up against a stone wall," he said.
Wecht questions the Warren Commission's
findings from 1964 and the U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark's panel
report from 1968 because the bullet hole in Kennedy's head moved four
inches.
"Who was right?" he asked. "Were they right
with the body in front of them in 1963 or was the Ramsey Clark panel right in
1968? Who's right? What difference does it make? It makes all the difference in
the world. Where did the shot come from? That's why it is the most difficult
case."
The lessons applied to Kennedy's death can be applied to
other cold cases. He said the key is to question everything with an open mind,
not just accept the facts as presented.
No comments:
Post a Comment