Mr. Ayton is the author of The JFK Assassination: Dispelling The Myths
(2002) and Questions of Controversy: The
Kennedy Brothers (2001)
Max Holland first established his credentials as a JFK
assassination expert through his painstaking research into how conspiracy
theorists had misled the public about the role the CIA
and other intelligence agencies played in the assassination. He was also one of
the first researchers to provide evidence which established that a Soviet
disinformation campaign had been responsible in creating many myths about
alleged US Government involvement in the death of JFK.
It was therefore surprising to read a review of Max
Holland’s new book “The Kennedy Assassination Tapes” that did not recognise the
author’s previous contributions to the subject. I am always suspicious of
anonymous reviews by newspapers and weeklies which cover subjects as complex as
the JFK assassination. What credentials and authority do the reviewers possess
and how much time have they spent researching the subject? With this in mind I
read Publishers Weekly review of Max Holland’s book.
It should be clear to many JFK assassination researchers
that Publishers Weekly has not understood the importance of Holland’s work and
how it has advanced the knowledge and understanding of LBJ’s role in the events
of November 22 nd 1963. The magazine’s writer maintains that “…much of
Holland’s book is redundant with Michael Beschloss’s recent and better executed
‘Taking Charge’ ….the bulk of the
tapes in question…have for the most part, already been thoroughly digested,
parsed and summarised…” However, Publishers Weekly has misrepresented Holland ’s
contribution. The writer is obviously unaware of the author’s unique expertise
in matching the contents of the tapes with his own erudition in the field of
JFK assassination studies, an erudition that does not extend to most writers
who previously used the LBJ presidential recordings. What differentiates Holland
from previous writers is the way he combines his extensive knowledge of the
circumstances surrounding the assassination and the subsequent government
enquiries with his own work transcribing and interpretating the presidential
recordings.
Although the books written by historians Michael Beschloss
and Jeff Shesol have been rightly acclaimed they are, in part, flawed. Both
writers have taken crucial assassination-related conversations out of context
in their books ‘Taking Charge’ and ‘Mutual Contempt’. Holland ’s
superior knowledge and intimate familiarity with the presidential recordings
has allowed him to correct the record. This can be no better exemplified than
in the way Holland provides the correct context to many of the statements LBJ
made about the assassination, the Warren Commission investigation and the
endless speculation that went on between 1963/69 about the possibility of a
conspiracy to murder President Kennedy.
Holland correctly relates how LBJ’s oft-repeated assertions
about a ‘JFK conspiracy’ have, over the years, led conspiracy advocates to lay
claim to having ‘proof’ that a conspiracy existed. But Holland ’s
background knowledge of the assassination and also his knowledge of the way LBJ
verbalised his thoughts is crucial. As he demonstrates, comments made by
Senator Richard Russell to LBJ – ‘I don’t believe it’ – and LBJ’s reply ‘I
don’t believe it either’ – have been misused by numerous writers to imply that
both men rejected the conclusions of the Warren Commission investigation. However,
as Holland correctly points out,
both men were discussing the single-bullet theory, not the conclusions of the
Warren Commission investigation. Holland
also corrects previous interpretations by showing how both men’s rejection of
the single-bullet theory was not based on considered judgements but simple
opinion. the time of the conversation in
question both men had not been privy to the ballistics evidence which supported
the theory. And LBJ’s manner of speaking, Holland
states, his ‘well-known penchant to exaggerate and speak for effect’, has long
been recognised by LBJ historians.
Furthermore, Holland ,
unlike Beschloss, puts the assassination-related conversations all in one
volume together with his extensive added commentary. The result is a clearer
understanding of what transpired when LBJ became embroiled in the conspiracy
controversy and the related Warren
investigation. Holland also takes
the story to the waning days of LBJ’s presidency.
This excellent book quickly and decisively silences the
conspiracy critics who believe that LBJ had a hand in the murder of his
predecessor. And, whilst conceding that LBJ may have harboured fears that
foreign involvement in the assassination was a clear possibility, Holland
nevertheless presents LBJ’s musings in the correct context of Cold War
realities and the fears the conflict engendered; fears that led LBJ into
speculation about whether or not Lee Harvey Oswald had been acting alone. LBJ
had been conflicted as to whether or not conspirators murdered JFK.However, he
was never able to substantiate his suspicions beyond simple guesswork. In the
end he merely speculated that Castro was likely to blame.
This book is by far the most lucid and compelling account of
the role President Johnson played in the investigation of President Kennedy’s
assassination. His book should be read not only by JFK assassination
researchers but also future LBJ historians.
No comments:
Post a Comment