History Will Not Absolve
Orwellian Control, Public
Denial,
and the Murder of President Kennedy
and the Murder of President Kennedy
E. Martin Schotz
The Pseudo-Debate
All of this
brings us to the real cover-up over all these years, which was not “Oswald” per
se but rather “the debate over Oswald.” In this
process we see the CIA following the
principles of intelligence agency assassination and cover-up as outlined by
Isaac Don Levine, an associate of Allen Dulles, in his analysis of the
assassination of Leon Trotsky by the Soviet Union ’s
NKVD. As Levine revealed, the classic manner by which an intelligence agency
attempts to cover itself is by the use of confusion and mystery. The public is
allowed to think anything it wants, but is not allowed to know, because the
case is shrouded in supposed uncertainty and confusion. This was and is the big
lie, that virtually no one is sure who really killed President Kennedy or why.
Of course over the years the terms
of the “debate” have been shifted as the public has learned more and more about
the case. Thus initially the phony debate was organized around the question of
whether the Warren Report was accurate or not. In other words, the
public was supposed to debate whether there was or wasn’t a conspiracy. As this
position was gradually eroded and it became evident that more and more of the
public did not believe in the lone assassin theory, another aspect of the
debate was developed.
The first fallback position of the
government was to acknowledge that perhaps or more than
likely there was a conspiracy, but if there was, the chief suspects were
Fidel Castro, the KGB, or the Mafia. And while these theories were pushed, it
was argued that the Warren Commission, acting in haste, had perhaps erred in
missing an assassin here or there. But all this was framed as honest error.
In order to bolster the government’s
credibility, the government always needed some writers who would argue that
the Warren Report in fact had been true, that Oswald was the lone
assassin after all. Thus the “debate” was broadened and complicated, but the
honor of the members of the Warren Commission was never conceded by the
government. It is important to understand that for the purposes of the
government it was not necessary that anyone actually be convinced that these
defenders of the Warren Report were correct. It was only necessary that people
believe that their writings were debatable, i.e., that there was some substance
to their arguments that Oswald was the lone assassin. If that point could be
debated, then the government was safe, because the criminal conspiracy of the
government of the United States
to shield the assassins after the fact was obscured.
No comments:
Post a Comment